"...it was impossible for the murderer to make his escape either naturally or supernaturally."- Joseph Rouletabille (Gaston Leroux's The Mystery of the Yellow Room, 1907)
Back
in early 2015, John Pugmire's Locked
Room International published an English translation of La
maison qui tue (The House That Kills, 1932), which was
written by a real-life juge d'instruction (examining
magistrate), Noel Vindry. The book was the opening salvo in his
celebrated M. Allou series, all of them published during the thirties
of the previous century, but this long anticipated translation proved
to be a dud and got a tepid reception – some reviews
were quite harsh in their condemnation of the book.
So,
not a very auspicious beginning of Vindry's first excursion into the
English-speaking world. Regardless of his initial reception, Pugmire
was evidently not prepared to give up on Vindry and published a
translation of La
bête hurlante
(The
Howling Beast,
1934) in 2016, which seems to have redeemed Vindry to the mystery
readers outside of the Francosphere. As a matter of fact, The
Howling Beast
is rapidly securing a reputation for itself as a recently unearthed
classic from the genre's Golden Era and this praise is as valid as
the criticism that was leveled against The
House That Kills.
One
other common theme, emerging from the commentary, is how difficult
the book (apparently) is to review, because it has an unusual
structure and an important sequence of events takes place in the
final leg of the story – which consists of no less than two
impossible murders. However, I don't see a problem where reviewing
the story is concerned. It can be done without giving any vital
plot-points away.
The
overarching structure of The
Howling Beast
is very similar to G.K. Chesterton's "The Dagger with Wings,"
from The
Incredulity of Father Brown
(1926), which (largely) consists of a conversation in which a series
of inexplicable events are related to Father Brown. Vindry took a
similar approach when his series-character, M. Allou, meets a very
peculiar individual on a holiday: a tall, bony-faced man with a
broken nose who makes eye-contact with the magistrate and says the
damndest thing, "I
haven't eaten for three days, monsieur."
Curiosity
aroused, Allou takes the man to a small restaurant and there he
learns that the man, who's named Pierre Herry, is on the run from the
police. Herry is the suspected perpetrator of a double murder
committed in an ancient, desolate castle situated on the outskirts of
Versailles.
Allou
had "experiences
with tricksters in the past"
and knew there was only way to catch them out: oblige them to betray
themselves by having them "describe
everything in minute detail."
So he encourages Herry to relate the whole story to him and the
events surrounding the eventual murders covers a long period of
several years, but the most important thing to note here is that his
story can be divided in two parts. The first two-thirds is very
reminiscent of one of Conan
Doyle's fancies, while the final quarter (including the
impossibilities) could have been dreamed up by John
Dickson Carr.
Herry
tells Allou about his friendship with Comte de Saint-Luce, a big-game
hunter, who owes his life to Herry's interference when a wounded
tiger turned on him. So, naturally, this inspired friendly feelings,
but several years passed and when Herry happened to be in the
neighborhood he decided to pay a visit to the castle of his old
hunting buddy – only to get a very cold welcome. Obviously, he was
an unwanted guest. An intruder even. Saint-Luce turned about and
insisted he stayed the night, which hurled him into a string of
strange events. One of the house guests, a Serbian engineer named
Carlovitch, vanishes from the premise and left behind his wife,
Sonia. A night-time attack is made on Herry and he hears the titular
howling coming from outside of the castle walls.
French edition |
So
his first stay at the fourteenth century castle was very eventful,
but nothing compared to his second visitation, which took place after
spending four years in India and found a strange situation upon his
return – one of them is that Sonia took up residence at the castle.
But there were also threatening letters. Saint-Luce has the statuette
of a sacred Buddha in his library and boosted how he had taken its "from
one of the temples in a particularly barbaric fashion,"
but now there a demands for its return. One note states, "when
the beast howls for a third time, you will die."
So,
as noted before, the first two-thirds of the plot really feels like a
Conan Doyle story and in particular three of his four full-length
Sherlock Holmes novels, which are The
Sign of Four
(1890), The
Hound of the Baskervilles
(1902) and The
Valley of Fear
(1914). You can say this part of the story is a throwback to the
Victorian-era sensationalist novel and does not, necessarily, present
a genuine mystery to the reader. However, this portion of the novel
is littered with hints and clues that will come into effect once the
murders have occurred.
Here's
where the review becomes somewhat tricky: the murders occur very late
in the book, when gunshots are exchanged in close quarters, which
looks very dire for Herry, because nobody else seems to have been in
a positions to fire the fatal shots. The rooms in question were
either locked, bolted or guarded and the castle, as established in
earlier chapters, is a completely sealed environment – precluding
any outside interference. So Herry found himself the favored suspect
of the local police.
Luckily,
for him, Allou reasoned an alternative explanation from his account
and given evidence, which is very Carrian in nature. However, it
anticipates some of his most famous locked room novels, but the germ
of this idea might have originated from Georges
Simenon's "The Little House at Croix-Rousse," a short story
from the late 1920s, which can be found in the locked room anthology
All
But Impossible!
(1981). This would be funny since The
Howling Beast opened
with an introduction, entitled "Noel Vindry and the Puzzle Novel,"
pointing out how much Simenon "disdained
the puzzle novel,"
because it was too rigid and "too
much under the influence of Anglo-Saxon writers."
So,
to make a long story short, The
Howling Beast
was an excellent detective novel to start the new year with and an
early candidate for the pile of best detective stories read in 2017.
It definitely made up for the sub-par The
House That Kills.
On
a final note, I surely hope Pugmire will consider Pierre Boileau's
Six
crimes sans assassin
(Six
Crimes Without a Murderer,
1939) for translation.
This looks like a really interesting read and glad to hear it was better than The House That Kills. (And how much I have dreamed of a translation of Six Crimes Sans Assassin! Maybe one day.)
ReplyDeleteIf you were let down by The House That Kills, this one will more than make up for that. And we can only hope Six crimes sans assassin is one of the many translations that will pass through LRI in the coming years.
DeleteI'm a THTK apologist as you know, but I did also love this one and agree that it's a superior book - those impossibilities coming so late in the day work superbly well, but at the time of reading I was beginning to worry that my copy was faulty or missing pages or something.
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, the Simenon story is also in the Black Lizard Book of Locked Room Mysteries, which the average reader will probably having an easier time getting hold of - it's a nice little story, actually, and surprising how well (and how genuinely) Simenon applies himself to something he claims to have great disdain for...
I forgot the story was also included in the Black Lizard anthology, but yes, readers might have an easier time getting their hands on that volume than the one I cited. Thanks for pointing that out.
DeleteI'm sure Simenon looked back on that particular short story as a "youthful indiscration" of his writing career. But it can't escape being compared to Carr and Vindry.
The Howling Beast does sound tempting, although it's depressingly expensive and out of my price range at the moment.
ReplyDeleteJot it down on your wishlist and keep an eye out for a cheaper, secondhand copy. One will turn up eventually.
DeleteI read this towards the end of last year, as I thought it would be a safer starting point than 'The House that Kills'. I enjoyed it too and glad it got a good review!
ReplyDelete