"After all the risk and labour of cremating the body... there had still been left clear evidence that a man had been murdered."- Dr. John Thorndyke (R. Austin Freeman's The Stoneware Monkey, 1939)
Margaret
Armstrong was an American magazine illustrator, book designer and
author of three standalone mysteries, which garnered praise from the
eminent Howard Haycraft, but she also caught the attention of a
present-day genre-historian, Curt Evans – who called her most
famous detective novel "a worthy enrollee in the Mary Roberts
Rinehart school of crime fiction." But the story, pleasingly, "emphasizes detection over the inducement of shudders and
shivers."
The
book in question was Armstrong's debut mystery, Murder
in Stained Glass (1939), rapidly followed by The Man with
No Face (1940) and The Blue Santo Murder Mystery (1941),
for which she drew on her own family legacy. Armstrong's father and
sister, David and Helen Armstrong, were well-known artists in the
field of stained glass. So the plot has a whiff of authenticity.
Murder
in Stained Glass begins with a traditional reflection that gave
the "Had-I-But-Known"
school of detection its name: the protagonist, Miss Harriet Trumbull,
ponders how the weather "often made a lo of difference in
people's lives" and if "the sun had not been shining on
one particular Monday afternoon," last March, events would have
taken a different course or not have happened at all – since she
would have been present in Bassett's Bridge. A quaint, rural town in
Connecticut, USA.
Miss
Trumbull was invited to the home of an old friend, Charlotte Blair,
who lives in the New England countryside, in a rather gloomy place,
where she also has a cousin, Phyllis Blair, staying as a guest. She's
also the one who drove Miss Trumbull to the family home and on their
way they pass the glass shop of the famous stained glass artist,
Frederick Ullathorne. The famous artist used to have his studio in
New York, but moved shop to Bassett's Bridge, because he hates
publicity and visitors kept walking on him after he secured a
commission for a cathedral window – which threw the short-tempered
artist into a rage.
A
temperament that also manifested itself in a quarrel between the
artist and the man in charge of firing the glass, Jake Murphy, who,
according to Ullathorne, used some red flash, a sort of glass they
rarely use, in the big cathedral window. It would be "ripped out
as soon" as possible and Jake would be docked for what it cost,
but Jake told his boss "he'd see him in hell first." We
also learn that Ullathorne not only has a temper, but also petty, as
he's jealous of his own son, Leo.
Ullathorne
never wasted much money on educating his son and used the
good-looking boy as a model, but recently, he began to see Phyllis. A
woman his father is interested in. So these are exactly the kind of
disturbing undercurrents one expects to find in a detective with a
small village setting and not long after Miss Trumbull's arrival a
young worker from glass shop announces he has found charred bones in
the kiln. And here I have to point out an amazing coincidence.
Murder
in Stained Glass was published in the same year as R. Austin
Freeman's The
Stoneware Monkey (1939), which also dealt with an artist's
studio and the cremated remains of a murder victim in a kiln. The
similarities end there, but the circumstances in which the victims
were disposed of by the murderer were very unusual and the only two
(known) examples were released in the same year. However, the time
between the writing and publications of both novels were too short
for one to have influenced the other, but still a noteworthy
coincidence and you have to wonder if something at the time gave both
authors a similar idea – such as an article about a real-life case
or simply a book we're not aware of. Who knows?
Anyway,
the evidence in the glass shop, a bullet-hole in a window and a
recently washed axe, suggests the victim was shot, chopped to bits
and stuffed in the kiln. The floor slopes down to the drain, in the
corner, which would have made it very easy to clean up the whole mess
in mere minutes. But who was killed? Ullathorne has not yet returned
from New York and Jake seems to have disappeared.
Miss
Trumbull showed herself to be "a
regular gadfly,"
or a "Meddlesome
Matty,"
when she decides to stick her nose into official police business. She
pokes around for a mysterious figure from Ullathorne's sketchbook, "the
dark lady,"
which proved to be skillfully tied to a second murder. Usually, these
additional murders, occurring late in a story, turn out to be filler
material and the overall plot could easily do without them, but here
such a late body proved to be very important to the plot. A plot that
was cleverly constructed and pleasingly toyed around with a classic
trick, which was applied here with some originality. There was also
an interesting and late clue of a vandalized, stained glass window.
But
as good as the plot was the writing, pacing and some of the
characters. I particular loved Armstrong's depiction of Bassett's
Bridge, which is awash with rumormongers and the village is described
as "having
a grand time"
- as they have not "enjoyed
themselves so much since McKinley was shot."
A very honest description of the gossip-and rumor mill of a such a
small place as Bassett's Bridge.
She
sketches an interesting, if unlikable, portrait of the policeman in
charge, Skinner, who seems to have a severe lack of scruples. Early
on, he tells Miss Trumbull he first success came when he jailed, a
presumable innocent, man on an arson charge, because the old guy was "better
off in jail than anywhere else."
At one point, he rushes off to "third
degree"
a tramp, but later admits it was "a
washout"
and, "what
was left of him,"
was let go in the end.
So,
all in all, I found Murder
in Stained Glass
to be a solid mystery novel, which had a pleasant balance between
plot, characterization and setting. As a bonus, there was the
specialized background about stained glass casting the story in "a
blaze of colour and light."
It give the book itself a bit of character. My sole complaint is the
rather short length of the book. A little more than a novella, which
made for a quick, fast-paced read. A very, very quick read.
Regardless,
the praise Armstrong received is well-deserved and I can recommend
Murder
in Stained Glass
as a nice little example of the Golden Age detective story.
Did you have a preference as between the Armstrong book and the Freeman book?
ReplyDeleteIts been a while since I read the Freeman one (2011!), but I would say they're pretty evenly matched.
DeleteFreeman's plot was, if memory serves me correctly, simpler in nature, but it came with some truly funny commentary on modern art. Showing how wrong Symons was when he claimed reading Freeman was like chewing dry straw.
So, no, I don't have a real preference for one or the other.
I have noted a recurrent pattern when Symons's book is referred to on these blogs: There is a respectful mention of the book and then a total disagreement with his critical judgment on a particular book or author.
ReplyDeleteAre you sure my comment fit the pattern? Because my references to Symons are never really respectful. I'm always surprised people, who actually know what they're talking about, treat him with any kind of deference.
DeleteMy comment was a general comment, not directed at your comment in particular. But to reference him at all is to really show a kind of deference to him as a person entitled to be quoted.
ReplyDeleteWell, I don't think referencing and quoting someone means you necessarily respect them or their opinion/position.
Delete