The Case of the Flowery
Corpse (1956) is the 49th Ludovic Travers novel by Christopher
Bush, now "an Elder Statesman of Murder," while
Travers has completed his transition from an amateur detective to a
genteel private investigator with a controlling interest in the Broad
Street Detective Agency, but this late novel hearkens back to the
quiet, rural village mysteries of previous decades – rife with
blackmail, gossip and murder. Something very different from the
post-war malaise or the seedier murders found in The
Case of the Fourth Detective (1951) and The
Case of the Amateur Actor (1955).
The Case of the Flowery
Corpse begins with Travers driving down to roads of rural
Suffolk, where he was born, to spend a belated holiday with an old
college friend, Sir Henry Morle, who bought a little place in the
village of Marstead. When he was close to being lost, Travers was
overtaken on the road by a reckless driver who must have been either "drunk or mad." So he was not surprised to find the car
ahead of him "piled up against a scrub oak in the hedge"
with its front in shambles and the driver without a heartbeat.
An unfortunate, if
unsurprising, roadside accident without an apparent hint of foul
play, but a closer examination and a strange coincidence turns
Travers' vacation into a busman's holiday.
Norman Ranger is the name
of the dead driver, "virtually the stage type of Irishman,"
who deliberately set out to to ingratiate himself with the villagers,
but, once accepted, suddenly changed his behavior and "had made
himself objectionable to practically everybody" – while never
divulging a single thing about his past or the source of his income.
Curiously, on the night he got killed, someone tried to burglarize
his home and that's quite a rare crime in the peaceful village. What
are the chances the burglary and the car crash happened on the same
night? And to make it even more suspicious, the doctor send the
organs to the county analyst to be tested for poisons. So they're
either looking at a bizarre accident littered with coincidences and
mysteries or deliberate murder.
Sir Henry is elated at the
possibility of a crime and getting to see the "unofficial
expert" of Scotland Yard tackling their little domestic murder,
but the Chief Constable quickly decided to call in the Yard. Sadly,
the case is too unimportant for Superintendent George Wharton to
handle. This is where The Case of the Flowery Corpse begins to
differ quite a bit from the early and later novels in the series that
I have read.
So my favorite Scotland
Yard detective is replaced with the quiet, competent and keen-eyed
Chief-Inspector Jewle. Where Wharton "would have raised hands of
despair and upbraiding to high heaven," Jewle "would shrug
his shoulders and carry on," but I can understand why Bush
sidelined Wharton here – because the plot required a more plodding
detective. There are no alibis that need destroying and even the
identity of the murderer is not central to the plot, but peeling away
the layers of mysteries surrounding the victim's identity and his
past, which eventually exposes a link between him and his murderer.
Interestingly, the plot is propelled by a surprising amount of
forensic detective work carried out in the background of the story.
I've already mentioned the
chemical analyses, but an examination of the second victim's clothes,
found covered in straw, reveals he had come in very close contact
with chrysanthemums and microscopic fibers inextricably linked the
two deaths together. Casts are made of footprints and tire marks
found at the crime scenes. Travers asks the police to get him a
picture of Ranger with the hair lightened up. So that people who knew
him with lighter hair can easier recognize him. An early example of
(forensic) photoshopping.
So the structure and
feeling of The Case of the Flowery Corpse differs quite a bit
from the novels Bush wrote during the 1930s and 1940s. It actually
felt like a J.J.
Connington or Freeman
Wills Crofts novel from the 1920s with the same quiet, unassuming
competence of the British detective story from that period. Bush was
70-years-old when The Case of the Flowery Corpse was published
and you have to wonder if he was feeling a little nostalgic, but the
ending was a reminder he had taken the series in a new direction. And
the ending finally gave Travers the full detective experience! So,
yeah, another welcome, long overdue reprint from the wonderful Dean
Street Press.
I remember enjoying this one quite a lot - not earth-shattering, but pleasing. Perhaps because (as you suggest) it was more in the style of the 1930s than the soft-boiled (poached? scrambled?) 1950s.
ReplyDeleteThe 1950s seem a return to form for Bush (well, Happy Medium aside); the post-WWII books of the 1940s are some of his weakest, but I enjoyed the handful I read from the '50s. Extra Man, Amateur Actor and Flowery Corpse don't break new ground, but they're all solid detective stories.
And - gosh! - I suppose Bush was in his 70s.
"The 1950s seem a return to form for Bush"
DeleteI'm curious now to see whether this return was due to nostalgia or dissatisfaction with the American approach. If there are any more from this period resembling early British mystery writers, like Connington and Freeman, it probably was nostalgia.