Raymond Rodney Robins was
an American soldier with a distinguished military career and there
were few officers, if any, who knew as much about the capabilities
and limitations of tanks, but he didn't earn his stripes on the
battlefields of that small, European skirmish – known in the annals
of history as the Second World War. Robins was one of the dedicated
and competent professionals who prepared his nations for "the
challenge of a global war." You can read a memorial to Robins
here.
The memorial also
highlighted "an intensely cultivated and literary side" to
Robins, which manifested in a book written together with his wife,
Ruth. A detective novel in which "the inner workings of the Colt
.45 Service Revolver" supplied "the intricacies of the
plot" and "the key of the mystery."
Robins' Murder at
Bayside (1933) is not particularly well remembered today and too
obscure to be even listed on the Golden
Age of Detection Wiki. A veritable who's who of who the hell are
these guys, but a (digital) copy of Murder at Bayside is
surprisingly easy to obtain. You can download a
free copy from the Internet Archive or buy a properly edited,
dirt cheap ebook edition published by Phocion in 2019. I believe the
reason why Murder at Bayside had slipped through the cracks of
public consciousness is that the book is somewhat of an anomaly
within the American detective story of the 1930s, because it squarely
falls within the thoroughly British "humdrum" school of Freeman
Wills Crofts and John
Rhode – focusing more on the how than the who-and why. I was
particularly reminded of Victor MacClure's Death
Behind the Door (1933).
This is, perhaps, not very
surprising considering the engineering background and technical
expertise of Robins, but an American "humdrum" mystery is not
something I had read before. So let's dig in!
Robert Williams is a
young, Baltimore lawyer and narrator who receives an invitation from
a client, Charles Evans, to "go down to Bayside for some
duck-shooting." Charles and his brother, Edwin, were born out
of their time and have "the temper which would have written
fresh pages in the history of the old West," but they're kept
in check by their uncle, Cyrus Evans. A self-made man who made his
pile in "the swashbuckling days of the turbulent nineties"
and kept "an inquiring finger on the business of the South"
during his retirement years. Strangely enough, his adopted son, Tom,
is "a chip off the old block with a vengeance." And he
made a name for himself as a criminal lawyer. They lived together at
Bayside with Charles and Edwin subsisting on their uncle's charity.
When he arrives at
Bayside, Williams learns from Tom that someone has been lying low
around the premise and suspects this is not an ordinary hobo, but a
former client he defended in court, Jim Hirstein – a convicted
murderer whose day of execution had been set when he broke jail.
Hirstein becomes the first suspect when Cyrus is found down by the
boat landing with a bullet in his back.
However, the police
quickly receives confirmation that Hirstein has an unassailable alibi
for the time of the murder and they shift their attention to the
people who were present at Bayside when that mysterious, fatal bullet
was fired. Williams statement that he heard only one shot, where
others have heard two, places one of the family members in the dock.
And what follows is a trial that ended (melodramatically) as quick as
it started without resolving the murder. This is the point where the
detective of the story, John Patrick, enters the picture.
John Patrick is Williams'
senior partner, a southern Dr. Lancelot Priestley, who looked like "the living prototype of the traditional Southern Colonel"
and he had developed "a belated interest in the field of
criminology," but was "more fit for arm-chair detection"
than good, old-fashioned legwork. Patrick and Williams decide to
ferret out the murderer, but, regrettably, the second half of the
story was a bit dull compared to the opening chapters that concluded
with the hasty trial. You can blame this on the second half continued
the play story as a whodunit, instead of an inverted detective story,
because the murderer and overarching scheme have become blindingly
obvious at this point – which made clearing all the extraneous
matter dull, unexciting detective work to read. Not even a second,
somewhat late, murder could liven up the story.
All of that being said,
the gun-trick was not bad and can be viewed as a borderline
impossible crime, in line with Ellery Queen's The
American Gun Mystery (1933) and John
Dickson Carr's "Inspector Silence Takes the Air" (collected
in Thirteen
to the Gallows, 2008), which is why the second half should
have concentrated on figuring out how it was done. It would have
probably made for a much more interesting and engaging read.
So, on a whole, Murder
at Bayside is not an unheralded, long-lost classic of the
detective story, but, as an American take on the British humdrum
school of detection, it's a fascinating curiosity that comes
recommended to fans of Crofts, Rhode and MacClure.
A note for the curious:
Murder at Bayside was published under Raymond Robins' own name
and Ruth Robins is not credited as co-author, but the novel is
dedicated to "the girl who really wrote this book."
This does sound both very American and quite Humdrum -- not a bad balancing act to pull off if done well. Shame it all falls in on itself, but I'll chalk it up on the list of stuff to keep an eye out for -- thanks for the review.
ReplyDeleteYeah, it's quite a sight to see two Americans trying their hands at the British humdrum detective story, but these pair of hands sadly lacked the skills and experience of their British counterparts. Still an interesting curiosity for genre scholars and staunch defenders of the humdrum school to pour over.
DeleteAn American humdrum mystery sounds intriguing, given that I'm a major fan of the Humdrums. So, sorta temping.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid you have to get an e-reader for this one, because the content is not worth the price of a secondhand copy.
Delete