10/16/22

Time to Kill (1974) by Roger Ormerod

Last year, I delved a little deeper into the work of a reprehensively overlooked mystery novelist, Roger Ormerod, whose writing career stretched from 1974 to 1999 during which he tried to balance the classic, traditionally-plotted detective story with the contemporary, character-driven crime novel – culminating in the creation of what can only be described as retro Golden Age mysteries. You can traces of Ormerod's ties to the classical detective story running through his earliest novels (e.g. More Dead Than Alive, 1980), but the dark, gloomy grit of the police procedural and private eye fiction appeared to dominate those earlier works. I assumed from my limited reading it was a difficult, fifteen-year-long process to arrive at those perfectly balanced, finely-polished 1990s retro Golden Age mysteries like The Key to the Case (1992), A Shot at Nothing (1993) and And Hope to Die (1995). 

So the plan was to continue to root around that period, but then Isaac Stump, of Solving the Mystery of Murder, began praising Time to Kill (1974) as "it perfectly sets up Ormerod's thorough and educated understanding of Golden Age-style alibi trickery almost in the style of Christopher Bush." That caught my attention even more than Isaac labeling Time to Kill as an impossible alibi with one of his favorite explanation to that particular problem. Christopher Bush died less than a year before Time to Kill was published and, suddenly, the prospect of Ormerod's classically-styled alibi-smasher appeared like a passing of the torch moment. Ormerod taking over the torch from Bush as he bowed out of actively being alive. And so it got moved up the pile. 

Time to Kill marked Ormerod's debut and introduced his first series-character,st Sergeant David Mallin, who demonstrates here why he's destined to abandon his career with the police to become a private investigator.

Several years ago, a then still Detective Constable Mallin assisted his mentor and later friend, Inspector Geoffrey Forbes, to catch a particular nasty piece of work. Eldon Kyle is a vicious drug pusher who moonlights as a championship snooker player and spends all his time around billiard halls, which is where he meets and ensnares, "like wretched hooked fish," his clients – picking them clean to "the last ounce of suffering cash." And "if the odd suicide depleted his clientele," there was always "the next initiate waiting in the agony line." Forbes really wanted to take Kyle down and eventually succeeded when Mallin had a flash of inspiration where he had hidden two pounds of heroin. Kyle is not the sporting type and immediately started uttering threats upon his arrest, which he repeated right up until he was sentenced. Eldon Kyle has now served his sentence and it doesn't take very long for Mallin to cotton on to the fact that he's out of prison.

The first chapter opens with Mallin being thrown around like rag doll by a big, bulky goon with "a face like an angel carved out of granite" and "huge, solid hands that swung just above his knees." A surprisingly good-humored, intelligent goon who later on in the story politely introduces himself as Odin Breeze and tails Mallin throughout the story while his massive frame is magically folded into a bright, orange Mini. Odin Breeze left behind one of Kyle's visiting card ("with the compliments of...") which is followed by a telephone call to invite Mallin to play snooker. Mallin accepts the invitation and the evening becomes an intense game with a growing crowd of spectators gathering around the snooker table. Needless to say, Mallin didn't emerge from the game smelling like roses, but the evening becomes even stranger when the night porter brings him a message. Mallin had no idea the retired Forbes had an apartment above the billiard hall and he had asked the night porter to tell Mallin to come up and see him. But what he found was murder. Forbes had been stabbed in the guts with a long, thin blade and left to die.

A murder with "all the hallmarks of Kyle's personality, the viciousness of the wound, lethal but not immediately," but Mallin had unwittingly handed Kyle a gift-wrapped alibi. Mallin is determined "to bust his alibi wide open," but only succeeds "in tightening his alibi" and digging a hole for himself. Kyle might have an unimpeachable alibi, but Mallin has a gap in his and, as it turns out, a pretty sweet motive to boot as he has been in love with Elsa Forbes for years – which eventually places him in direct opposition with his own superior. Only way to dig himself out of that hole is smashing Kyle's alibi to pieces. 

Time to Kill is a very short, snappy detective story that immediately comes to the point and handily uses the trappings of the character-driven police procedural of the time to simultaneously setup the series and the plot. There are no unnecessary, extraneous plot-threads dangling around the background as everything's linked together and the result is a very trim, crisply told detective story with a cleverly contrived plot carefully balanced on a daring a alibi-trick. The trick really is something on par with a top-tier Christopher Bush novel! I had a pretty good idea how Kyle could have done it, but there was a huge, gaping hole in the theory that warranted second thoughts. But then the solution turned the entire situation around (ROT13:V jnfa’g gurer va beqre gb tvir uvz na nyvov”) to neatly plug that hole. A possibility I had not considered, while it seems rather obvious in hindsight. So you can say Ormerod delivered the kind of goods you expect (or hope) to find in a detective novel penned in that fine, time-honored tradition of the genre's golden period!

However, I've to disagree with Isaac's qualification of Time to Kill as an example of the impossible alibi. I know it's not a widely accepted definition of the impossible alibi, but I can only accept an alibi as an impossible crime when the murderer appears to have been physically impossible to have carried out the crime. So no tampering with clocks, manipulating witnesses or so-called paper trails. It must appear as a physical impossibility for the murderer to have done it, because of a physical limitation or under going surgery at the time of the murder. Time to Kill is an excellent alibi-smasher, but, alas, not an impossible one. But feel free to disagree. Everyone else does around here. :)

So, on a whole, Time to Kill is a short, but sweet, detective novel that played the inverted mystery as a dangerous cat-and-mouse game between Mallin and Kyle with an annoyingly sturdy alibi as the linchpin of the plot. And it worked marvelously! Ormerod understood what makes a plot tick and gave his readers a glimpse what could have been had the Golden Age detective story been allowed to evolve naturally pass the 1950s. Highly recommended as Ormerod deserves to be acknowledged for keeping the home fires burning during the final decades of the previous century. A period that was not exactly kind to the traditional detective story.

8 comments:

  1. Personally I consider the inability to be in two places at once to be a "physical limitation", but that's just me. It all depends on your perspective!
    - Velleic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We had this discussion before. Several times. Nobody agrees on the definition of what constitutes an impossible alibi. I still think my definition is the most useful to discern between a normal alibi and an impossible one, but what can you do? I guess a better solution is simply to place the alibi-puzzle under the howdunit umbrella, which already is adjacent to the locked room and impossible crime genre. Feel to disagree.

      Delete
  2. And here I was, worried you'd write a scathing review of TIME TO KILL to spite me for not enjoying THE KEY TO THE CASE. I'm glad you like this one so much, it's still possibly my favorite ORMEROD I think, for a solution that manages to be daring without teetering on the preposterous (MORE DEAD THAN ALIVE hits like a bolt of lightning to a reader, but try explaining the impossible crime solution to someone else, you sound absolutely insane). In my opinion, it is definitely one of the best detective fiction debuts of all time, which makes it a perfect introduction to Ormerod. Glad to hear we agree on this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would never write a scathing review out of spite. Compiling a list with names of certain individuals for future reference? Sure, why not, but never spitefully tearing something down over differing opinions. ;) We always come across as absolutely lunatics who obsess over the implications of a rusted bolts or cobweb covered windows. You have to be pretty hopeless and lost to get it.

      By the way, I got your email and perhaps something ended up in your spam folder, but will keep what you asked in mind.

      Delete
    2. Oh, yes, I just saw the e-mail in my spam folder! Yes, it's a personal identity thing, so my name has changed. I didn't explain it in the email and I really ought to have but it's simply that I've recently realized that I am transgender and no longer go by he/him. People who know me in real life and aren't aware of my identity read my blog, so I decided to go by "l.", a lowercase L which looks like an upper-case i in most fonts, instead of my new chosen name, which starts with "L". This gives me some plausible deniability while also allowing me to technically go by my new name... while also making it so I have to have this conversation with every blogger.

      Anyway, I'm very sorry for the trouble and the long explanation, I know it can be annoying to have people like me ask you to change how you refer to me because of my own personal identity revelations, so I appreciate you being amenable.

      Delete
  3. Re: Impossible alibis, I believe I've found an example that even you cannot argue is NOT an impossible alibi...

    I'm currently reading むかしむかしあるところに、死体がありました (Once Upon a Time, There Was a Corpse), a collection of short stories that twists classical puzzle mysteries out of Japanese folktales. The first story is called 一寸法師の不在証明 (The Alibi of Issunboushi), which is twisted from the legend of Issunboushi, a brave one-inch-tall man who, although tiny, desperately wanted to protect his princess. In the line of service, he is eaten by an Oni who wants to kill and eat the princess. But instead of dying, Issunboushi kills the Oni from the inside, and is awarded with a magic hammer that makes him 1.80 meters tall.

    In the legend, this is where the story ends, but in The Alibi of Issunboushi the story continues with a detective who suspects Issunboushi of murder and is thrown off-guard by the man's bizarre alibi: at the very time of the murder, Issunboushi was INSIDE OF THE BELLY OF THE ONI. Multiple witnesses, among whom are the princess's faithful royal guard, all attest to the Oni eating Issunboushi, and the fact and the manner in which the Oni died is proof that Issunboushi was absolutely inside of the Oni at the time... giving Issunboushi an almost incontestable alibi: at the time of the murder, he was inside of a monster's stomach...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, that absolutely sounds like a bizarre, but marvelous, premise for an impossible alibi. Something tells me the solution is not matching that premise. Such as the murder victim being mentally linked to the Oni and died when Issunbousi killed it. Unwittingly killing two birds with one stone. But that collection sounds fascinating nonetheless.

      Delete
    2. My theory was similar, but in my mind a better variation of the same concept. The Oni *was* the murder victim, who was hit by the magical growing hammer earlier in the story. Issunboushi murdered the victim disguised as an Oni so that he could commit the murder in front of everyone with impunity, while also having an airtight alibi.

      Delete