"In fact the way this was worked was so sublimely simple, when I tell you, you'll wonder why you didn't get it in five seconds flat."- Jonathan Creek (Jonathan Creek Series 2, Episode 2: The Scented Room, 1998)
Several
months ago, I reviewed an impossible crime novel, The
Weight of Evidence (1978), written by the late Roger
Ormerod and noted in my post that he had two other books listed
by Robert Adey in Locked Room Murders (1991), but an
inspection of his bibliography revealed two overlooked locked room
titles - namely More Dead Than Alive (1980) and And Hope to
Die (1995). The synopsis of the former immediately caught my
attention, because the description of the plot struck me as a
prototype of Jonathan
Creek. I turned out to be correct.
More
Dead Than Alive is the penultimate novel about David Mallin and
George Coe, a pair of private investigators, who started out as
separate series-characters, but formed a partnership after crossing
paths in Too Late for the Funeral (1977). The Weight of
Evidence was the inaugural case of their partnership and they
would appear in that capacity in half a dozen books.
More
Dead Than Alive is narrated by the wife of David Mallin, Elsa,
who has been staying at a crumbling, drafty medieval stronghold,
Kilvennan Castle, which is owned by the husband of an old school
friend, Konrad Klein, known as "the greatest escapologist"
since Harry Houdini – even celebrated as "one of the world's
leading illusionists." But that was a long time ago. The modern
world doesn't flock in droves to the theaters to see illusions
anymore and magic on television lacks the prestige of the stage,
because you can always assume it's "a trick of the camera."
So the magician has been laboring diligently, up in his tower room,
on dangerous new trick by combining elements of the Sword Box
Illusion with the Bullet Catch Trick.
Konrad
had constructed a special trick-cabinet, a heavy, carved wooden box
on castors, in which his lovely assistant, Amaryllis Moore, had to
take place and mere seconds after closing the door he would "fire
a bullet through the cabinet at chest height" – from side to
side! A very dangerous trick that could possibility revitalize his
failing career, but the illusion refused to work and Amaryllis had
begun to loose her nerve. The dummies that are being used to the test
the cabinet are riddled with bullet holes and she simply refuses to
enter the deadly contraption.
So
it was not unusual to hear gunshots emanating from the work room,
but, one day, a loud crash echoed down from the tower and when they
went to investigate they found that the unlocked door would not butch
as much as an inch. And the reason? It was blocked by the heavy
trick-cabinet. When they finally wormed passed the blocked door, the
only thing they found was an open window overlooking "the
sea-slicked cliffs” and “the piled waves crashing into the
cliff over peaks of rock." A sheer death-drop of several
hundreds of feet!
Mrs.
Clarice Klein asks Elsa to call in her husband, David Mallin, to
advice her what to do about her missing, and now presumed dead,
husband, because his life had been insured at the tune of 100,000
pounds. Konrad used to joke he was "worth more dead than alive,"
but the insurance policy came with a suicide-clause and is
non-payable in case the magician took his own life. A fact that
places a big question mark behind his disappearance act in the tower
as suicide appears to be the only logical answer.
David
Malling arrives with George Coe at the ancient castle and they begin
to poke away at both the case and the trick-cabinet, which places
them at odds with an agent of the insurance company, Martin Fisher –
who can expect "a percentage commission" in case of
suicide. This is, however, not the case. Once the two private-eyes
learn the secret of the cabinet, they come up with a delightful
(false) solution explaining how the mysterious disappearance could
have been an unfortunate accident. And in that case, the
double-indemnity clause is triggered and the insurance company has to
cough up 200,000 pounds to the family.
Arguably
the best aspect of More Dead Than Alive is all the theorizing
and testing of potential solutions to the problem of the tower room,
which is largely done by Coe, who emerges her as an enthusiastic, if
crude, detective in the Roger
Sheringham mold. Coe even credited Edgar
Allan Poe's famous 1844 short story, "The Purloined Letter," with helping him find Konrad's hidden drawings and papers about all
of his illusions. So there's a definite link with the great detective
stories of the past in this 1980s mystery novel. Something that
becomes even more pronounced when Konrad's body washes ashore with a
bullet wound.
The
fact that Konrad was shot to death makes his disappearance from the
tower room a full-fledged impossible crime. One way or another,
either he had left the room and was murdered elsewhere or his was
killed there and his murdered had left the room, but either way they
had to pass through a door that was blocked from the inside by a
heavy cabinet – which proved to be practically impossible to move,
or manipulate, from the outside. Something that was painfully
demonstrated when Coe's hand got stuck in between the doorpost and
blocked door during one of his tests.
Nevertheless,
Coe comes up with a number of possible explanation for the blocked
door problem.
One
of them is rather practical and shows a method that could be used to
leave the room blocked from the inside, while another false solution,
based on sound and misdirection, was obviously based on Clayton
Rawson's masterly "From Another World" (collected in The
Great Merlini: The Complete Stories of the Magician Detective,
1979). However, while Coe was experimenting with various
possibilities, Mallin was silently contemplating the case in the
background and noticed the significance of the clues provided by the
fatal bullet and a test dummy that was found lying beneath the
window.
These
clues yield an entirely different kind of solution that's not as easy
to accept as the other proposed explanations, but, admittedly, it had
been wonderfully foreshadowed in the early part of the book. And much
simpler in nature than the other explanations. You just have to
accept that nobody would notice what was going on right under their
very own noses.
That
being said, More Dead Than Alive is an imaginative locked room
novel that reads like a predecessor of the Jonathan Creek
TV-series. I can easily imagine how a slight rewrite, and replacing
the detective-characters, could turn this book into a full-fledged
Jonathan Creek TV-special. David Renwick would probably have
some fun rewriting the final page of dialogue, between David and
Elsa, which lends itself to his style of comedy.
So
this probably piqued the interest of locked room readers and fans of
the Jonathan Creek series, but the book also shares some of
the weaknesses of the latter which may turn off some readers. The
book is purely concerned with the how of the crime, which the who-and
why hinges upon, while the characters populating the plot are (even
by my standards) paper thin. You really have to take More Dead
Than Alive purely as an impossible crime story, because, as a
mystery novel, it's only a very minor work in the overall pantheon of
detective-fiction.
Still, as a locked room novel, it deserves to be
better known for its multiple (original) solutions and somewhat
daring final explanation to the central impossibility.
"The book is purely concerned with the how of the crime, which the who-and why hinges upon, while the characters populating the plot are (even by my standards) paper thin."
ReplyDeleteYou say that as if it's a bad thing... :(
My observation was not meant to imply such blasphemy, Christian. I loved it as a pure, plot-oriented locked room mystery, but also know that not everyone is wildly enthusiastic about this approach. Just look at the criticism leveled against Jonathan Creek and Paul Halter. And The Maze by Philip MacDonald taught me there's something to be said for having some characterization in a detective story.
DeleteSo it was merely an observation, and a warning, that readers should not expect anything more than a howdunit with a string of false solutions attached to it.
The emphasis on plot and puzzle, at the expense of characterisation, makes this novel sound like one of Paul Halter's weaker offerings... I do like Halter's novels, even when plot and puzzle overshadow characterisation and setting/ atmosphere - so maybe I might like this one?
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, I was thinking of what other mystery novels weave magic with mystery... I just discovered a new mystery series featuring a magician called Eli Marks as the sleuth on my local Kindle store - a series by John Gaspard. Have you encountered any of his works?
I suppose you can compare the book to some of Paul Halter's work, but the plot felt closer to the stories Renwick wrote for Jonathan Creek than the locked room novels by Halter.
DeleteNever heard of the series before. But one particular, standalone, novel I remember liking very much, which mixes magic and mystery, is Elephants in the Distance by Daniel Stashower. I was really charmed at the time by background and characters of the story, but the plot, as far as I remember, was not bad either. Somewhat on the light side perhaps.
Well, this sounds absolutely nothing like the kind of thing that would interest me...
ReplyDeleteYeah, this one has very little to offer to an apostle of Scandinavian noir, like yourself. ;)
DeleteThis sounds like a pretty good book to me. I just ordered my copy. At least the book is about detectives detecting and not groaning about their personal lives.
ReplyDeleteIt has no groaning, whatsoever, on the part of the detectives. So I hope you'll enjoy the book, Anon.
DeleteThis has most certainly piqued my interest. The narration from the point of the wife is interesting as well, is there a different narrator in each work?
ReplyDeleteNo idea. I only read two of Ormerod's books, but the other one was not narrated by Elsa Mallin. So maybe this was as a one-off because the case involved one of her old school friends.
Delete