The Murder of Steven
Kester (1931) is the second outing of Harriette
Ashbrook's smart-alecky, playboy detective, Spike Tracy, which
may have been her most commercially successful endeavor as it was
adapted, in 1934, as the black-and-white movie Green Eyes –
a movie with a minor footnote in the history of television. The movie
received its first
telecast on Sunday, February 25th, 1940 on NBC's experimental
station W2XBS
in New York City.
Just like its
predecessor, The
Murder of Cecily Thane (1930), Ashbrook's second novel is a
thoroughly conventional detective story compared to her subsequent
novels such as The
Murder of Sigurd Sharon (1933), A
Most Immoral Murder (1935) and Murder
Makes Murder (1937). A typical, 1930s American detective
story written and plotted in the traditions of the Van
Dine-Queen School. However, as John Norris pointed out in his
2013 blog-post, "The
Detective Novels of Harriette Ashbrook," her "tendency to
be a bit risqué" is "on flamboyant display in this book."
You can hardly picture
Philo Vance, or Ellery
Queen, attending a fancy dress party "dressed only in a
tiger skin" and "an air of irrepressible good-humour."
Spike Tracy is a friend
of Miss Jennifer Vinton, granddaughter of Steven Kester, who left her
parents when she was an infant, but Kester seldom found the time to
be a grandfather and left her in the care of a kindly, adoring nurse,
Dora. Who's now somewhat of an old family retainer privy to "the
household skeletons." Kester's attitude towards his
granddaughter changed when she returned from abroad as a young woman
with "a complete set of friends" and began to have
daydreams about launching his granddaughter in society, which would
lead to a marriage with a suitable young man and a great-grandchild –
preferably a boy who would bear his name. Jennifer shattered his "dignified daydreams" by falling deeply in love with a
hardworking law clerk, Cliff Millard, who makes long hours to make
ends meet.
Kester, "an awful
snob," is dead set against Jennifer marrying a man "he
considered his social inferior" and stopped her weekly
allowance, but, when she pawned her jewelry, he threatened to cut her
out of his will. And he even summoned his lawyer. Somewhat of a
mistake when you're already an unlikable character in a detective
story.
On an evening in June,
Jennifer throws "a masquerade party" at her grandfather's
Long Island mansion, Long Hills, but the party ends when the body of
Steven Kester is found, stuffed in a closet, with multiple
stabwounds!
Spike flippantly remarks
to the local police how beautifully the murder of his host "fulfills
all of the requisites" of the best detective stories with a
house party (check), a corpse (check) and an amateur detective who
happened to be present when the murder was committed (check), but
rarely has an amateur detective slipped so easily into a murder
investigation in such an unlikely situation – putting him to work
when District Attorney Foxcroft recognizes him as "the damn fool
that solved the murder of Cecily Thane." I suppose it also
helped that he's the younger brother of the D.A. of New York City, R.
Montgomery Tracy, but, even by Golden Age standards, it was somewhat
amazing at how fast Spike was calling (most of) the shots.
As an aside, Chapter V
gives a brief biography of Spike, but the biography was almost
entirely copied from The Murder of Cecily Thane. I thought
that the passage sounded familiar and remembered the phrase "a
charming hybrid." So I went back to compare those passages and
they are indeed the same. What a lazy way to pad out a chapter!
Gratefully, I don't have to say the same about the busy plot, which
has more complications than merely two headstrong lovers opposed by a
family patriarch.
Several days before the
party, Roger Herries arrives at the house and was introduced to
everyone as an old friend of Steven Kester, who would be staying a
few days, but Kester was clearly annoyed at both his presence and
references to the Arco iron mines – even ordering his
private-secretary to dump all of his Arco mining bonds. Something
that becomes very suspicious when Herries attempts to flee the house
after the murder. There's also money missing from the wall safe and
something had been burned in the basement furnace. However, the most
baffling aspect of the case is that the overly diligent murderer put "the phone and the cars out of commission," not once, but
twice! One of those flashes of originality that would come to define
Ashbrook's future novels.
Nonetheless, The
Murder of Steven Kester is largely a conventional, typical Van
Dine-like detective novel, crammed with clues and red herrings, which
should help the observant, suspicious-minded reader with spotting the
murderer well before the end. Even if the clueing was a bit dodgy at
times. The pair-of-dice clue is a good example of a dodgy clue given
very late into the story, but hardly enough to sink the story as a
fair play mystery. More importantly, Ashbrook pulled all of the
plot-threads together to my full satisfactory.
So, plot-wise, The
Murder of Steven Kester is a competently constructed, charmingly
told detective story with a splendid setting, a solid alibi-trick and
interesting character backstories, but not a shining example of
Ashbrook's ability as an innovative and original mystery novelist.
You have to turn to the previously mentioned The Murder of Sigurd
Sharon, A Most Immoral Murder or the superb Murder
Makes Murder, if you want to see what she was capable of as a
plotter and story-teller. Otherwise, The Murder of Steven Kester
comes recommended as a good representative of the American detective
story from the early 1930s.
This only leaves me with
the last and somewhat contentious
Spike Tracy novel, The Purple Onion Mystery (1941), but,
keeping the end of Murder
Comes Back (1940) in mind, I still hold out of hope for it.
You truly have a detective in you dear Tomcat and the same is very well felt in your writings. Thank you for giving us such a detailed and well-opinionated review on the The Murder of Steven Kester. I too felt that the story has been explained in a very constructive and charming way with beautiful alibi methodology and also the way the characters are made are extraordinary.
ReplyDeleteYour passion for thriller novels in so well-portrayed in the form of thoughts and reviews of detective books such as The Murder of Steven Kester. Your outlook of the book was very commendable and does drive the eagerness in the readers to consider reading the book.
ReplyDelete