"In the stock market—and I know just enough about the market to know that money begets money—it is possible to make or lose millions in an hour."- Prof. Augustus S.F.X. van Dusen (Jacques Futrelle's "The Problem of the Vanishing Man," collected in Great Cases of the Thinking Machine, 1977)
Willoughby
Sharp was born into a wealthy, prominent New York family and briefly
followed in his father's footsteps as the head of a brokerage firm,
but this endeavor only lasted three years and moved his family to
island of Bermuda – where they lived from the "judicious sales
of costly pieces of jewelry" that Sharp had bought his wife
during the 1920s. Upon his return to New York, Sharp entered the
world of publishing and even became the author of a pair of obscure,
long-since forgotten mystery novels.
Fortuitously,
Murder
in Bermuda (1933) and Murder
of the Honest Broker (1934) were reissued by Coachwhip
in 2013 and Curt Evans
wrote an extensive introduction of roughly thirty pages. One that was
littered with Van Dinean footnotes, sometimes eating up the bottom
half of a page, but the biographical details were very interesting
and one event of note was the brutal murder of Sharp's ex-business
partner, Claude Kendall – a notorious publisher of controversial
and banned books. Evans wrote a short piece about this case on his
blog, entitled "Murder
of the Publisher: Who Killed Claude Kendell," which (sort of)
is provided with a possible answer in the comment-section.
A
second, unsolved mystery brought up in the introduction concerned a
third detective novel, that was announced, but never published!
For
1935, Sharp had promised a second case for the policeman character
from his previous novel, Inspector Bullock, which was to be titled
The
Mystery of the Multiplying Mules and even supplied a very
enticing synopsis. Reportedly, Bullock is called in by Logan family,
not because something was stolen, but something had been added to
their property. On three successive Friday mornings, they've found
strange mules "in their locked barn" and "three
deaths follow in rapid order." Sadly, the book was never
published, or even written, and can be added to this
depressing list of lost manuscripts and unpublished detective novels.
Something that becomes even more depressing when you realize the
locked barn might have provided the plot with an impossible
situation.
Thankfully,
we can still get our greedy hands on the two mystery novel that did
roll off the printing press and my choice fell (for no specific
reason) on The Murder of the Honest Broker.
The
broker of the title is Philip Torrent, who may be an honest
stockbroker, but the opening of the book shows he's surrounded by a
coterie of would-be assassins and all of them are lavishly supplied
with a variety of motives. One of them is his business partner,
Temple Hastings, who defrauded him to the tune of "three hundred
and eighty thousand two hundred and forty-seven dollars," but
the timely passing of Torrent would put Hastings in the clear.
Torrent also has a nephew, Howard, who, according to his uncle, has
only ambition and that's "to drink dry every hotel, restaurant
and speak-easy in the city." So he refuses to supplement his
nephew's monthly allowance. The stockbroker is also a silent partner
of Chipo Marinelli, who runs a speak-easy, but Torrent wants to
cash-out and this means that the barman has to cough up seventy
thousand dollars. But there are also some personal motives.
Mrs.
Mary Torrent is unfaithful to her husband with another stockbroker,
Jack McDonald, who wants to marry her, but her husband "refuses
a divorce on any grounds."
However, Philip Torrent also has an extramarital affair with one Lucy
Laverne, but when he ends their affair she promises that he will "live
just long enough to regret it."
So
there are more than enough suspects to go around when Torrent
collapses on the floor of the Stock Exchange.
Enter
Inspector Francis X. Bullock of the Homicide Squad: a great,
red-faced giant of a man, "brusque
of speech and direct of manner,"
who has been overheard commenting with "Irish
fluency, causticity and blasphemy"
of the subject of certain class of "mythical
and infallible beings"
- namely the storybook detective. Bullock would love to meet "one
of those mincing, namby-pamby know-it-alls"
and put his hands around one of their "damned
supercilious necks."
He even echoes Sgt. Beef from Leo
Bruce's
Case
for Three Detectives
(1936) when condemning their "Egyptian
mummies and their stuffed fish and their underground passages and
their slant-eyed, Chinese hatchet men."
Regardless
of Bullock's antipathy for Philo
Vance, Drury
Lane and Thatcher
Colt, the police inspector gives away a grand performance as one
of the Great Detectives of the Printed Page. A remark he would no
doubt answer with absolute contempt (see ending).
A
problem facing Bullock is having to uncover the common denominator
between the poisoning of Philip Torrent and the death of Sandy
Harrison. Only a short time after Torrent collapsed, Harrison was
thrown in a similar convulsion in his office on the top-floor of the
Stock Exchange, but there doesn't seem to be a motive for killing
both men within the same quarter of an hour. And then there's the
tricky question how a deadly quantity of curare could have been
introduced into the bloodstream of both men.
Slowly,
but surely, Bullock pieces together the truth based on scraps
recovered from the paper-strewn floor of the Stock Exchange, a red
metal pencil, a phonograph needle that was not smeared with poison
and a passage from South American history. One thing that was, sort
of, impressive is how the origin of the poison was actually used as a
hint. Usually, the presence of curare is nothing more than to give a
story a tinge of the exotic, but here it actually functioned as a
clue of sorts and helped put Bullock on the right track –
demonstrating that Sharp knew his way around a plot.
The
method for administrating the poison, as well as the deadly
connection between both murders, clearly showed the ghoulish
ingenuity we so gleefully associate with the genre's Golden Age.
However, I was somewhat less enthusiastic about the revelation of the
murderer.
In
my opinion, the culprit in Murder
of the Honest Broker
was a little too well hidden from the reader, which somewhat weakened
the obvious attempt by Sharp to play completely fair with his
readers. I suppose it still qualifies as a fair play mystery novel,
but not a perfect textbook example of how the least-likely-suspect
card should be (ideally) played. What was interesting about this
aspect of the solution is how much the murderer's actions resembled
those of the culprit from Max Rittenberg's 1914 short story, "The
Mystery of Box 218," which can be read in The
Invisible Bullet and Other Strange Cases of Magnum, Scientific
Consultant
(2016). There's even a similar sort of relationship, but how or what
would be spoiling both stories. I just wanted to point out that
there's remarkable similarity in the solutions of both stories.
So,
all in all, Murder
of the Honest Broker
was not bad, not bad at all, which comes with an authentic backdrop
and some ingenuity as far as the method is concerned, but the
highlight of the book the presence of Bullock – who does not,
exactly, hover inconspicuously in the background. He forcefully takes
center-stage of the story and I would not have it any other way. It
also makes the loss of his second recorded case all the more
depressing.
Who knows... maybe one day a yellowing, crumbling
manuscript of The
Mystery of the Multiplying Mules
is excavated from a bottom drawer or a dusty, long-forgotten archive.
Until then, I'm glad this one got reprinted and I'll be taking a look
at Murder
in Bermuda
sometime in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment