"When people say things behind your back there is nothing you can refute or deny, and the rumors go on growing and growing, and no one can stop them."- Miss Marple (Agatha Christie's "The Thumb Mark of St. Peter," from The Tuesday Club Murders, 1928)
Genre historian Curt Evans, author of Masters
of the "Humdrum" Mystery (2012), and Rupert Heath of the Dean Street Press are promptly
becoming the usual suspects in the revival of obscure, long-forgotten mystery
writers – having already brought E.R.
Punshon, Ianthe
Jerrold and Annie
Hayes back into the fray.
The next name on their hit list is "Harriet Rutland," whose real name was Olive Shimwell, and wrote "three of
the most unjustly neglected English mysteries from the Golden Age of detective
fiction." It's an opinion echoed by John Norris in his reviews of Knock,
Murderer, Knock (1938) and Bleeding
Hooks (1940). So that was all the encouragement I needed to pounce on
Rutland's debut novel!
Knock, Murderer, Knock takes place at a hydro-hotel, called Presteignton Hydro, perked
above a private beach in Devonshire Bay and the sprawling building provided a
home to "a collection of oddities" – most of whom are permanent resident
patients of the place.
Rutland succeeded in coating her
satirical illustrations of this cast of gossiping gargoyles with a layer of
gravity, which complemented the equally unusual plot.
Personally, I was very fond of Mrs.
Dawson, who had failed to find a publisher for the thriller novels she had
written and sniped at the reader by observing how "the reading public
nowadays is never satisfied with only one murder" and there needed to be "two
or three, at least." Which would become prophetic!
Ah, but there are more personages of
interest: Colonel Simcox, a sock-knitting veteran of the Great War and a
working class aristocrat, Lady Warme, who inherited her title from her
green-grocer, philanthropic husband, but that's a private-embarrassment. There's
also a pious Miss Astill and a batty Mrs. Napier, among others, who are
overseen by a staff and a professional nurse under the guidance of Dr. Williams
– owner of the resort.
None of these characters or their
behavior can be easily pigeonholed as typical, stock-in-trade clichés of the
genre, which can be considered as a triumph of characterization. They're all a
bit daft or eccentric, which can be an object of fun, but it's their buggy
behavior that makes the story swing between satire and brooding seriousness.
But, enough about the characters, lets
shift the focus of this review to the plot. A plot with no less than three
murders knitted in its design and the first body is that of the beautiful,
evocative Miss Kane, who turned the heads of the men and scandalized the women,
found slumped on a settee in the lounge – a knitting-needle jammed into the
base of her neck.
A 25-cent Dutch edition Knock, Murderer, Knock |
Inspector Palk is saddled with the responsibility
of ferreting out the murderer and is assisted by Sergeant Jago, who laments
that the "craze for detective fiction" gives "the general public too
much information about finger-prints and police procedure." Of course, the
sergeant loves reading thrillers, but it's all right for him because it's his
job. Needless to say, I took as much of a liking to sergeant as I did to Mrs.
Dawson.
Anyhow, Palk struck me as a poor man's Inspector
Roderick Alleyn. At the end of a series of interviews, Palk does make an
arrest and assumes the murder is solved, but, "before the week ended,"
he and his "band of constables" would be back – to resume those "grueling
hours of police questioning" after someone else got poked with a
knitting-needle.
In his introduction, Evans compares Knock,
Murderer, Knock to the works of some of Rutland's "Great British Crime
Queen Contemporaries," which has all the familiar names, but neglects to
mention Christianna
Brand and Gladys
Mitchell.
The book reminded me the most of a
combination of both their works. The relationship between the first victim and
the rest of the cast reminded me of London Particular (1952), in which
an outsider is murdered within a close-knit group of people and it doesn't seem
to matter – until another murder strikes a lot closer to home. It's even
pointed out that Miss Blake and the assumed murderer "had been like
visitants from some other world whose actions left them entirely unaffected"
and how the situation "might have been different if any of the older
residents had been involved in the murder."
Of course, the main difference is that
people in Brand's closed group of insiders genuine cared for each other, but that
lack of humanity and mental quips would've been food for Mitchell's Mrs.
Bradley. Who's not unfamiliar elements of abnormal psychology in her murder
cases.
Well, Palk seems insistent on flubbing
the case by looking for a copycat-killer the second time around, but soon finds
himself in the company of a mysterious guest at the hotel, Mr. Winkley, who swiftly
acquired a reputation as a crime-fiction enthusiast. Initially, Winkley seems
to be playing a poor man's Roger
Sharingham, but there's a clever mind behind his fumbling and bumbling, which
succeeded in drawing out the murderer and the explanation was very much in line
with the psychological nature of the story.
The only disappointment was how very,
very wrong my own solution was. I had dumped all of my eggs into one basket and
was wrong on every count, which revolved around a description of one of the woman
at the resort: described as a big woman with "large, capable hands" and "exquisitely
corseted," but the "illusion of femininity" was marred by the "masculine
tones of a deep, resonant voice." Nurse Hawkins had mentioned once or twice
how the Victorian-minded patients "don’t like to be naked altogether,"
which would be a perfect cover for something that was very not done during the
1930s and the people who stumbled to this secret ended up with knitting-needle
in their neck.
However, Knock, Murderer, Knock is a very good, well-written story and one that'll be especially appreciated by seasoned mystery readers, because it's something off the beaten track. Definitely recommended!
I loved this one too - review soon - but I'm a bit surprised that you missed the killer as I thought Rutland telegraphed it in one certain scene. So it says a lot that despite this, it's stillpossibly the best of the recent Golden Age rediscoveries.
ReplyDeleteOh, yes, you're correct and know exactly what scene you're referring to, but I thought that was red herring/genre-related joke. I like to fancy myself as a modern day Sherlock Holmes, but I'm much closer to the ever-fallible Roger Sheringham.
DeleteThanks for the review - I have been thinking of making an advance order for this title, and was scouring around for a review. Were you disappointed because you missed the actual solution, or because the actual solution paled in comparison to your own, and to the promise of the storyline?
ReplyDeleteThere are too many Golden Age mysteries I want to buy, and my shelves are stacked to the brim with hard-copy books I've purchased... Time for a Kindle!
The disappointment was with myself. Not with the book. I felt so smug after having pieced together those "clues," which I mentioned towards the end of the review, only to be proven wrong on every single count.
DeleteWell done review touching on many laudable aspects of a very well constructed and extremely entertaining mystery novel. Rutland reminded me of Brand too, though I never mentioned the similarity when I wrote about this book earlier this year. I'm surprised you didn't trust your gut instinct when it came to the identity foo the murderer, TomCat. I figured this one out easily using all her cleverly placed clues.
ReplyDeleteAnyone interested in a review of BLEEDING HOOKS, Rutland's second mystery featuring Mr. Winkley, can check out my blog review under the US title THE POISON FLY MURDER.
I know, I know! I was trying to be too clever with my own solution and failed miserably, but I have an opportunity to redeem myself, because Bleeding Hooks will be my next read. Your review is a great appetizer!
Delete