Several years ago, I reviewed Annie
Haynes' The
Crime at Tattenham Corner (1929) in which a well-known
racehorse owner on the eve of the Derby, but the victim owned the
odds-on favorite to win the race and the rules are clear on this –
an owner's death renders void all his horses' nominations and
entries. So the death of the owner took the prospective winner out of
the race.
Brian
Flynn was a criminally underappreciated mystery writer, as well
as a racehorse enthusiast, who used a practically identical premise
in one of his earlier detective novels. A novel that was published in
the same year as The Crime at Tattenham Corner.
The
Five Red Fingers
(1929) is the fifth entry in the Anthony Bathurst series,
rediscovered by Steve
Barge and Dean Street
Press, which centers around a South African millionaire, Julius
Maitland, who returned to England to indulge in his ruling passion –
horse racing. Maitland and his much younger wife, Ida, each own a
racehorse, Red Ringan and Princess Alicia, who have the odds in their
favor to win the Big One of the racing season. But, even more than
that, Maitland dreams of "the
classic double"
of Derby and Oaks "won
by husband and wife."
A
good portion of the first half flies through the year leading up to
the Derby with hints drops throughout the narrative that something is
amiss.
Maitland
suffered a severe shock when he spots a stout, overdressed man and a
dark-haired woman of "very
uncertain years"
passing through the corridor of a train, but the person with him
could not say whether it was the man or woman who shocked him. Even
stranger is that Maitland is unexpectedly called back to South Africa
to attend to an extremely urgent and important business matter, which
means he has to miss the highly anticipated Derby. And with her
husband out of the picture, Ida decides to run her own horse in the
race.
Red
Ringan and Princess Alicia "pulled
up within a few yards of each other past the winning past,"
respectively coming in first and second, which is a huge victory for
Maitland's stable, but as the results were flashed around the world,
the police station at a seaside village receives a frantic phone call
– a man shouting he's being murdered. What the policeman on the
phone hears next is a heavy thud, loud laughter and the strains of a
violin before the line goes dead. So they go to the bungalow from
which the telephone call came and find the body of Maitland. Shot
through the throat! And according to the medical examiner, he had
been "dead
for a good couple of days."
This
has costly, far-reaching consequences because, under Derby rules, his
horse had "no
right to run in the race"
and is retroactively disqualified with Princess Alicia declared the
new winner. A change that was either a deadly blow or an unexpected
blessing to the people who had either drawn Red Ringan or Princess
Alicia in the Calcutta Sweep.
Flynn
never explained what, exactly, the idea behind the Calcutta Sweep is,
but Steve Barge, our very own Puzzle
Doctor, explained it in the introduction as follow: "a
high money sweepstake, linked to important races, where, for a
significant sum of money, a ticket is bought that is randomly
assigned to one of the horses. The money is put into a prize pot, but
then the tickets are potentially auctioned off, with that money also
going into the pot. The prizes are then apportioned between the
owners of the tickets for the first, second and third horses."
You only get an idea how high the stakes truly were until Maitland is
willing to part with twelve thousand pounds for half a share on a
single ticket. If you adjust for inflation, "£12,000
in 1929 is equivalent in purchasing power to about £767,355.07
in 2020."
So
with all the bizarre circumstances and high stakes, Sir Austin
Kemble, Commissioner of Police, immediately throws up his hands in
despair and tells the family that he's prepared to hand over the case
to "a
brilliant man"
who "has
helped Scotland Yard more than once when it has confronted very grave
difficulties,"
Anthony Bathurst – a dilettante with no official standing
whatsoever. I liked it!
During
their investigation, I began to disagree with the general consensus
that The
Five Red Fingers
is not to be counted among Flynn's best detective novels, but that
was because I was following a false trail with a familiar scent to
it.
I
was already gravely suspicious of the gunshot wounds to the throat.
You can bet dollars to donuts that every notable deviation from the
knife in the back, bullet to the head or twist with the scarf usually
turns out to be an important piece of the puzzle. Robin
Forsythe made it a specialty of his Anthony Vereker series (e.g.
The
Ginger Cat Mystery,
1935). So when Bathurst comes across a nest of clues, inside a
disused barn, I read them to mean that the plot was a delightful,
Golden Age-style elaboration on a very well-known Sherlock Holmes
story. Flynn was not only a horse racing enthusiast, but also a
massive Conan
Doyle mark and his detective novels are littered with references
to the Great Detective and Easter eggs.
Well,
I missed the mark completely here. The
Five Red Fingers
does a good job in setting out false trails, real or imagined, with
strategically placed red herrings all over the place, but there were
so many of them that actual clues became scarce and weakened an
already coincidence-laden, sometimes illogical, solution even further
– with one of the coincidences bordering on an Act of God. An
anti-climatic and deeply unsatisfying solution to a detective story
that began with the promise to play a high-stakes game.
So,
yes, The
Five Red Fingers
is not representative of Flynn's work of the period and, if you're
new to him, I recommend you begin with either The
Mystery of the Peacock's Eye
(1928) or Murder
en Route
(1930). But if you, like me, are waiting for the next ten reprints to
be released, The
Five Red Fingers
will do until then.