"An armed society is a polite society."- Robert A. Heinlein
I had planned Ianthe
Jerrold's Dead Man's Quarry (1930) as my next read, but, once again,
got sidetracked. However, I hope to read it somewhere around the weekend. So a
review is coming!
In the
meantime, I dipped into the twelfth entry in the Bureau Raampoort-series: Een
schim in de nacht (A Shadow in the Night, 2015). The series was
co-created by Simon
de Waal and Appie
Baantjer, but the former had to continue solo after Baantjer passed away in
2010.
A Shadow in
the Night begins when summer is finally on the horizon
and evenings are slowly growing longer, which draws a veteran of the Amsterdam police,
Peter van Opperdoes, from his home and into his favorite café – to enjoy coffee
and apple pie. It's a quiet, peaceful moment broken by the sound of gunfire emanating
from the nearby Noordermarkt.
Van Opperdoes finds
a mortally wounded man, recipient of several bullets, who clings to life long enough
to mutter these cryptic last words: "ik was het zelf" ("I did it myself").
The nature of the bullet wounds and the absence of a firearm on the body makes
suicide unlikely, which is confirmed when a gun and shell casings are found a
considerable distance away from the body. But then what did the victim mean
that he did himself? Jacob thinks it was simply the incoherent ramblings of a
dying man, but their inquiries soon open new avenues of investigation.
The identity
of the victim is confirmed when his twin brother reports him missing, which
gave Van Opperdoes and Jacob quite a fright in the beginning – as they were
confronted with him just after bringing the body to the morgue. I was hoping
the body would disappear from mortuary, but this is a contemporary, Dutch politieroman
and not a John
Dickson Carr novel from the 1930s.
Ideas of
mistaken or swapped identities was entertained, but the eventual solution ran
in a different direction and was stamped with De Waal's trademark signature:
professional underworld figures, small-time, petty criminals and other,
enterprising persons operating in the gray areas of the law, who always seem to
lurk in one place of a story or other. There are several kinds of them in this
story and there's professional in a short, separate story line and a second, unnecessary
murder for the story – one that's solved after discovering the crime-scene was
stuffed with hidden surveillance cameras that recorded the murder.
There are some
petty crimes and criminals involved in the first shooting, but the explanation
yielded an unexpected surprise, which was only (somewhat) foreshadowed in the
characterization of the people involved. But the surprise was welcome! Unfortunately,
the "dying message" was just a red herring to mystify rather than a clue to the
identity of the murderer. As Jacob remarked, "it would saved us a lot of
hassle if he simply had said (...) had shot him."
Interestingly,
the final parts of the book were apparently penned with a deadline looming
ahead, because Van Opperdoes figures out the case while watching footage of the
Baltimore riots on TV. Yes. There's something in footage that helps Van
Opperdoes to grasp the explanation.