"It's no use crying over spilt evils. It's better to mop them up laughing."
- Eleanor Farjeon
The family of Benjamin Farjeon, a
prolific novelist from the Victorian period, came from humble stock, but all of
the children from his household were able to carve a name for themselves in
several cultural genres – such as literature, theatre and music.
Harry Farjeon was a magician, composer and
teacher. Herbert Farjeon was an important figure in British theatre and a stage
critic. Eleanor Farjeon was an author of children's author who has a book-prize
named in her honor. But the one who is of interest to us is their brother and a
once famous fiction writer, J.
Jefferson Farjeon.
J. Jefferson Farjeon proved himself as fertile
a writer as their father and reportedly a personal favorite of Dorothy
L. Sayers, praising him as being "quite unsurpassed for creepy skill in
mysterious writing," but his work and reputation has languished in
obscurity for decades. Recently, there seems to have been a change, as he
appears to be undergoing a personal renaissance, reminiscent of Gladys
Mitchell's rise from literary oblivion during the previous decade – going
from one of the most obscure names in the genre to having nearly all of her
books reissued by various publishers. I think I can pinpoint where and when
Farjeon's began to reemerge from the mists of time.
On November 22, 2011, Curt Evans published his first
blog-post on "The Passing Tramp," which was a reference to "one of the era's unlikeliest series detectives,"
Ben the Tramp, who appeared in eight of Farjeon's roughly eighty novels. Evans
also seems to have been the first person on the internet to have reviewed
or simply talked
about Farjeon. It might just have been a coincidence, but the Poisoned Pen Press reprinted Mystery
in White (1937) in 2014 and the book sold over sixty thousand copies –
making it a smash
hit that surprised everyone.
As a result of this unexpected success, three
additional titles were reissued, The
House Opposite (1931), The
Z Murders (1932) and Thirteen
Guests (1936), with more of them on the way.
Personally, my only exposure to Farjeon's work
came from reading the splendid, original and very amusing Holiday
Express (1935), which deserves to be reprinted, but I sort of forgot
about his books that were on my to-be-read pile after that – both of them old
pocket editions from Collins White Circle. So I had to decide between The
Third Victim (1941) and Prelude to Crime (1948), which was decided
in favor of the former. I found the synopsis of the book to be very appealing.
The Third Victim
tells of George Lyster's return to his ancestral home after having spend
twenty-six years of his life in Australia, but what he finds is a place as
faded as his quarter-of-a-century old memories of the place
When he walked out of the gates of Broadland
Hall twenty-six years before, they "had been well kept and imposing,"
but now the rusty, corroded iron made "the two dignified cavaliers who had
stood for centuries on the gate posts" look unimposing and the place
impressed him as being "shockingly neglected." A once large staff that
was needed to run the estate had been decimated and reduced to only three
persons: a gloomy, fretful butler, named Dyke, who appears to be under the
thumb of the antagonistic housekeeper, Mrs. Peto. And there is a gardener who "believes
in skeletons and headless men and such nonsense."
Worryingly, this bunch of characters have been
looking after Lyster's invalid mother, Dowager Lady Lyster, who suffered a
crippling and paralyzing stroke, which left her unable to speak and can only
communicate by the feeble movements of her hands – twitching her left or right
hand to answer yes or no questions. Only normal person she got see in a long
time is a now middle-aged woman from the neighborhood, Evelyn Eames, who Lyster
remembers as "that long-legged kid" from all those years ago and wonders
why she is not bringing up a family of her own.
Sad state of the place reminds Lyster of a time "when there was less dust around" and "when the house was fuller,"
as well as friendlier, but from the family solicitor, Mr. William Lotham, he
learns there's clinging more to the estate than simple neglect.
The reason for Lyster's return to England was
the sudden death of his brother, who broke his neck in a fall from the high
gallery into the hallway below, but Lotham informed him the tragedy occurred
only an hour before Sir Maitland altered his will – which practically left
everything to his brother who was still down under at the time. He was also
surprised to learn there was a legacy for an adopted daughter, Ursula, which
was to be held in trust for ten years and if she married a certain Ralph Murray
her share would revert to Lyster.
Fourteen years ago, Sir Maitland had
adopted foundling twins, a pair of eight-year-olds, named John and Ursula, but
the boy tragically died two years later when he fell from the high gallery. It
was "in precisely the same way" as his adopted father would perish
twelve years later. Lyster concludes "there’s not only dust in this house,"
but poison as well and swears to clear it out – so one can breath again.
Lyster engages the services of Detective
Kendall and Sergeant Wade, once attached to Scotland Yard and now operate as "the
private detectives in the kingdom," who came to Broadland Hall in disguise
for a discreet enquiry. Kendall plays the role of an history enthusiast, "Headley Swayne," who comes to Broadland Hall to gather material for his book, The
Historic Homes of Britain. Wade has to be contend with playing a second
butler to the place. It’s an arrangement described as a bit of a comedy, but,
stylistically, it has an interesting affect on the story and characters: the
infusion of a bunch of normal and sane people in the formerly dark, neglected
and decaying home begins to have a similar effect on the place as airing a
house that had been boarded up for years.
Past shadows are slowly being shooed away
and slowly they are getting closer to identifying the murderous entity lurking
in the home, which may be one of the books two sole weaknesses.
The first of these two weaknesses is the
clueing, which is really nothing more than foreshadowing. It nods in the direction
where the explanation can be found, but nothing more than that and you can only
really guess the murderer's identity. Secondly, the identity of the murderer
who serves here as a jack-in-the-box surprise, but I think the murderer
belonged to both a different genre and period of time. I thought The Third
Victim was not unlike one Annie
Haynes' nineteenth century-style detective novels with an ending that could
have been lifted from the pages of an Edgar
Allan Poe story. It could make for a splendid and fun period story, but I
was hoping the ending would have been a continuation of the first three
quarters of the story, which constituted the best parts of the book – both
story-and plot-wise. Stylistically, the ending struck a bit of a false note,
because it moved along the lines of a British country house mystery before ending
up in Poe country.
However, I can easily imagine this will
be less of a problem to readers who are warned there's a sharp twist in the
road towards the end of the story. So you can thank me for going ahead and
warning you about it.
Finally, I have to note that The Third
Victim struck me as an indoor version of Ivans' De
bosgeest (The Forest Spirit, 1926).