Christopher
Bush's thirtieth detective novel, The Case of the Missing Men
(1946), takes place in 1944 and Ludovic Travers, who was invalided
out of the army the previous year, has become a consulting specialist
for Scotland Yard, but here his prior work as a writer brings him to
the home of a celebrated mystery novelist, Austin Chaice – a
character who may have been modeled after Anthony
Berkeley. Our in-house genre-historian, Curt
Evans, noted in his introduction that this was not the first time
Berkeley was "a satirical target" of Bush (c.f. The
Case of the Monday Murders, 1936).
The Case
of the Missing Men presents the reader with, as Anthony
Boucher described it, "the simon-pure jigsaw-puzzle
detective story" and this helped the book secure a spot on my
list of favorite Bush mysteries.
Travers is
summoned to Lovelands, the Beechingford home of Chaice, by two
separate invitations. One of these invitations came from his literary
agent, Cuthbert Daine, who has found a publisher prepared to reprint
two of his books as special editions and wants him to come down to
work out a contract.
Daine had
been bombed out of his office in London during the Blitz and Chaice
had put a large, converted barn at Lovelands at his disposal. The
second letter came from Chaice and he wants to use quotes from a book
Travers wrote, Kensington Gore, to use in "a kind of
manual for budding authors of detective novels" he's working
on. But when he arrives at Lovelands, Travers discovers a household
that is set up like a game of Clue.
Chaice is
married to Constance, a cousin of Travers' wife, whom he remembers as
a terribly spoiled, decidedly oversexed flapper and there are two
children from his first marriage, Kitty and Richard. Kitty is "a
spirited veteran" of the ATS (Auxiliary Territorial Service),
while Richard is a neurotic Oxford student trying to hack it as a
modern poet and his father hated it – referring to his poems as "mental abortions." Chaice also has an elder brother,
Richard, who had been a rolling stone, but suffered from "fits
of abstractions" ever since he lost his wife and was bombed in
the Blitz. And now he spends a lot of time in his workshop at
Lovelands. Orford Lang is Chaice's private secretary with a failed
career behind him as a mystery novelist.
Chaice is a
schemer, through and through, who loves to play games and toy with
people as well as the public at large. A notorious example of this is
when he purloined a typewriter from the headquarters of a small army
unit stationed near Lovelands.
After a few
days, Chaice wrote to local newspaper to reveal himself as the thief
and slammed the authorities for their "scandalous laxity"
in the care of government property, however, it turned it he had an
ulterior motive for the theft – using the episode in a book he was
writing. When the story opened, the town was in "the throes of a
sensation" as some maniac used the combination of crowds
pouring out of the local cinema and the blackout to squirt a filthy
liquid over women's clothes. Some at Lovelands believe Chaice is up
to his old tricks again. And there have been anonymous letters,
signed "P," which outright accuses the mystery writer of being
behind this outrage.
So the family
ropes in Travers and Daine to put a tail on their host and the
followed him to the house of his next door neighbor, G.H. Preston,
but the whole campaign was a bust. But when they returned to
Lovelands, they discover the body of Chaice in his study with a cord
tightly pulled across his throat!
Initially,
Travers works together with a local and much respected police
inspector, named Goodman, but when a second murder is committed,
disguised as a suicide, the Chief Constable, Colonel Marney-Hope,
decides to call in Scotland Yard – reuniting Travers with his
long-time partner in crime, Superintendent George "The General"
Wharton. I have prattled enthusiastically in past reviews how perfect
they are when they work together, playing off each others strength
and weaknesses, and, as said in my review of The
Case of the Platinum Blonde (1944), nobody really nailed the
relationship between the amateur and professional detective quite
like Bush.
Wharton is
the consummate professional with the patience of a fisherman and
repertoire of a character-actor when it comes to interviewing
suspects or witnesses, which made him one of the Big Five of the
Yard. On the other hand, Travers has "a helterskelter,
flibbertigibbet, crossword sort of brain" that "works
quickly or not at all." So this makes him, as Wharton calls it,
a prize theorist whose average is one theory right in every three.
And this means that Wharton, every now and then, beats Travers to the
solution (e.g. The
Case of the Murdered Major, 1941).
However, they
have genuinely respect for each others abilities and The
Case of the Tudor Queen (1938) perfectly describes their
relationship as two opposites that make a perfect fit. I couldn't
agree more!
The Case
of the Missing Men has them neck-to-neck in the race to the
solution, as they try to make sense of such clues and red herrings as
an out-of-bounds summerhouse, a stick of grease paint, a block of
wood and letters that were recovered from Preston's house – one of
the missing men of the book-title. Wharton makes a shrewd deduction,
identifying one of the red herrings revealing part of the truth, but
the one who spots the elusory, well-hidden murderer is Travers. And
completely demolishes a set of risky, closely-times alibis in the
process. The alibi-tricks in Bush's mystery novels is something that
will never fail to delight readers mostly concerned with the plot of
a detective story.
On a side
note, the second murder, or ideas used to commit that murder, bear an
uncanny resemblance to the murder from Cat's
Paw (1931) by Roger
Scarlett, but with a somewhat different outcome. One of these
differences is the inclusion of the murderer's daring alibi.
So, in
summation, The Case of the Missing Men is a carefully put
together detective story with a tight plot full of clues, red
herrings, alibis and excellent detective work on the part of Travers
and Wharton. My only gripe with The Case of the Missing Men is
its book-title. There are two missing men in the story, but feel that
the book-title is a bit of a misnomer. The Case of the Elusive Men
or The Case of the Running Man (read the book) would have
fitted the plot much better. Otherwise, this is a pure detective
novel from the old school and comes highly recommended to all puzzle
fiends.
"some maniac used the combination of crowds pouring out of the local cinema and the blackout to squirt a filthy liquid over women's clothes."
ReplyDeleteThis sounds very like "the glue man" in the 1944 film A Canterbury Tale...
This book looks like a real winner! Thanks for your enthusiastic but well-reasoned review.
ReplyDelete