Karel Abma was a Dutch
notary and the author of De hond was executeur (The Dog Was
Executor, 1973), a practically forgotten and long out-of-print
novel, which has been summarily described on the internet as a
detective story about "an inheritance issue and a divorce case"
– converging around the tangled legacy of a lonely miser. If you
glance at the cover, you can probably make an educated guess what
drew my attention to this little-known mystery novel.
Unfortunately, The Dog
Was Executor is not exactly an all-out, guns blazing, locked
room mystery and the locked room element was so insignificant, I
decided against tagging this review as an impossible crime. But I'm
getting ahead of myself.
Riemsdorp is the backdrop
of The Dog Was Executor, a village "rich in front gardens
and white-painted bridges," which is slowly being annexed, "field after field, yard after yard, with everything on it," by Amsterdam – less than 5 kilometers (3 miles) away. The bailiffs
perpetually haunted the village with "a bag full of
expropriation writs." Setting the tone for the rest of the
story.
Johannes Blaudop is a
77-year-old recluse and miser who lives in a small, blue plastered
house on the Vaartweg, known locally as "het Zwartelaantje"
(the dark lane), where his only companion is a Belgian shepherd,
Argus. Blaudop is "criminally tight" when it comes to
spending money and notorious for his dogs, which has lead to legal
problems on more than one occasion. The villages thought he was
mostly crazy, but with "damned cunning" edge to his
twisted mind and they generally disliked him. So nobody really missed
Blaudop when he didn't show his head for a couple of days until the
mailman notices a card stuck behind one of the windows, saying "On
Holiday," but the dog can be heard frantically barking inside. And
the odor emanating from the place has the kind of presence that
lingers.
The police is notified and
they enter the house to rescue the dog, but what they find is
Blaudop's decomposing body in the anteroom, close to the wardrobe,
where he had been laying for nearly two weeks! Blaudop had a died of
cardiac arrest, but a slight head wound showed he had fallen with his
head against the wardrobe and the card behind the window, in
combination with the missing key to the backdoor and the presence of
a bloodstained handkerchief, suggests the possibility of murder –
leaving the authorities with a plethora of unanswered questions.
Admittedly, the premise of a man of whom no one can say for sure
whether, or not, he was murdered and whether he was rich, or poor,
sounded intriguing, but don't expect too much from the answers to
this various questions. The Dog Was Executor is an entirely
different type of animal compared to the Golden Age and neo-classical
detective novels that dominate this blog. A character-driven crime
novel with a social conscience and a handful of different "detectives" to tackle the various criminal and legal aspects of
the case.
Chief Inspector Messing is
officially in charge of the case, but Blaudop named his former
lawyer, Karel IJ. van Woudrichem, his testamentary executor and is
tasked with finding his long-estranged daughter, Dinie. She was taken
as a 9-year-old girl to Canada by his ex-wife, which is the source of
Blaudop's bitterness and disdain for authority because they allowed
his daughter to be taken. And the legwork of the tracking down the
inheritors (including a not-legally disinherited son) is placed on
the shoulders of a junior notary, Evert Dijkgraaf. Frank Kok is the
police's dog expert-and trainer who has to get the wild dog out of
the house and tame it. Lastly, there's the village itself, which is
always buzzing with rumors and speculations about the case.
The questions they try to
answer is who was in the house when Blaudop died and did this person
had a hand in his death? Why didn't his dog defend him? Was there a
modest fortune in 1000 gulden banknotes and what happened to
it? Where's his daughter and who was the mysterious fisherman? Why
was a World War I photograph stolen after the body had been
found and removed? There are even some courtroom scenes when someone
is apprehended with incriminating evidence on him and is charged. So
the story is busy enough, but hardly any of it made for a good or
even mildly satisfying detective story.
K. Abma |
When I started reading The
Dog Was Executor, the plot's legal wrangling brought the novels
of Cyril
Hare to mind (e.g. Tragedy
at Law, 1942), but written in the style and spirit of the
Realist/Social School of Georges
Simenon and Seicho
Matsumoto, until turning over the last page and realized it was
very similar to another 1970s "detective" novel – namely Ulf
Durling's Gammal
ost (Hard Cheese, 1971). Hard Cheese is a
Swedish novel that began as an old-fashioned, classically-styled
homage to the Golden Age detective novel, but the ending revealed it
to be a novel of character and petty crimes masquerading as locked
room mystery. You can pretty much say the same about The Dog Was
Executor. Only difference between the two is that Abma obviously
never had any intention, whatsoever, to write anything remotely
resembling a traditional whodunit. The Dog Was Executor is a
modern crime novel with a pinch of social commentary loosely based on
true stories reported in the daily newspapers, which Abma
acknowledges in "A Message to the Reader" printed on the opening
page covered with newspaper clippings.
So, all in all, Abma's The
Dog Was Executor was not exactly a rewarding read, if you prefer
the plot-driven puzzle detective story, but it was a shot in the dark
based solely on the cover art vaguely hinting at the possibility of a
locked room mystery. The book could have been a brilliant and
criminally forgotten impossible crime novel, but it wasn't. I took a
gamble and lost, but hey, it was worth a shot. And if you actually
like these social/realists crime novels (why?), you might actually
enjoy this atypical crime novel.
I can't really be angry
that the book didn't turn out to be one of those very rare,
completely forgotten Dutch
locked room mysteries, such as Cor Docter's Koude
vrouw in Kralingen (Cold Woman in Kralingen, 1970),
but I was disappointed that the story had all the material necessary
to have made it a full-fledged locked room mystery with some minor
tweaks to the plot. So why not end this review on positive note and
pad it out with the locked room-trick I envisioned. Some very mild
spoilers ahead!
Needless to say, the
tightfisted Blaudop acquired an expensive watchdog to guard something
on the premise and, let's say, X suspected what it was and wanted to
get his hands on it, but how to get pass the locked doors, latched
windows and an a hungry watchdog – because Blaudop was also very
economical when it came to feeding Argus. So my idea is that X waited
until Blaudop left the house to go fishing and began to carefully
remove one of the windows panes and flung drugged piece of meat
through the opening, which puts Argus (temporarily) to sleep. X then
puts his hand through the opening to unlatch the window and enter the
house to begin his search, but places a "Gone Fishing" card on
the front door window to prevent any unexpected visitors from
intervening. Whether, or not, the search is successful is irrelevant.
X leaves the same way as he came in and replaces the window pane with
fresh putty, but had forgotten to take away the "Gone Fishing"
sign!
So, when Blaudop comes
back, he sees the sign on his front door window and, immediately
suspicious, goes inside (locking the door behind him) and finds his
unconscious dog on the floor. Blaudop rushes towards the dog, but
slips on some dog drool and smashes with his head against the
wardrobe. The excitement and shock is too much for his heart. The red
handkerchief had been carelessly dropped by X and a dying Blaudop had
mindlessly picked it up to press against his bleeding head wound. And
died in a perfectly locked room, or house, with the keys of the
back-and front door in his pocket and evidence all around him that a
second person had been present when he died. But he had been alone
with his sleeping dog when it happened.
Only problem with my
solution is that it effectively removed the evidence of the dog,
which was vital to identity the culprit, but in my scenario you can
use the fingerprints left on the "Gone Fishing" sign. Yes, not
very elegant, but fits the anti detective-like approach of The Dog
Was Executor.
Notes for the curious:
in case you wondered, Argus survived his ten-day ordeal because there
was a large aquarium in the house and the book was actually turned
into TV-movie in
1974, but have been unable to locate any copies or find it anywhere
online. Lastly, you can expect a new review to be posted tomorrow,
because this book obviously holds no interest to 99% of people who
read this blog.
As a member of the 1% I have to say I thought your "murder method" of slipping on Angus' drool was very entertaining. I'd hate for Angus not to be part of the solution though, so maybe he bit "X" and the police can match to bite marks?
ReplyDeleteGlad you liked my solution!
DeleteThe problem with Argus biting X is that X removed the window pane and tossed in a drugged sausage was to prevent getting attacked and bitten. If you want Argus to be part of the solution, you can take a page from Abma's original solution and have Argus recognize X. Argus can go, "oh, there's the nice X who gave me that delicious treat and the best nap I ever had. Let me go lick X's hands and wag my tail."
🤦♀️...How did I miss that! I can only blame it on reader’s fatigue in the Age of Covid.
Delete