"In tackling a criminal case... you look for motive and opportunity."- Ellery Queen (Ellery Queen's The Player on the Other Side, 1963)
Previously,
I reviewed Murder
Among the Angells (1932) by Dorothy Blair and Evelyn Page,
who wrote under the shared penname of "Roger Scarlett," which
used to be an overpriced rarity on the secondhand book market, but
recently, it was reissued by Coachwhip
Publications – together with the rest of the series. Murder
Among the Angells proved itself to be an excellent detective
novel and decided to follow it up with the second title contained
within in that very same twofer volume.
Apparently,
Cat's Paw (1931) is very different in structure and approach
from the preceding two books, The Beacon Hill Murders (1930)
and The Back Bay Murders (1930), which reportedly were
entirely written in the spirit of S.S.
van Dine. Obviously, Blair and Page took their cue from Ellery
Queen here, but the structure of the book also differs from your
standard, Van Dinean-era whodunit.
Cat's
Paw is divided into four parts and begins with a short prologue,
titled "The Question," in which Underwood receives a wireless
message from Inspector Kane, who's vacationing abroad, asking to "get
in touch with police on Greenough case" and "find out
everything." The second part, "The Evidence," tells what
happened leading up to the murder and "The Case" is a preliminary
investigation by Kane's subordinate, Sergeant Moran. The fourth and
last part, "The Solution," gives an explanation drawn from the
preceding two parts and "the clues rejected by Sergeant Moran."
So
the Boston inspector functions here purely as an armchair detective
and reasons the truth from the information that has been brought to
him by Underwood and Moran. It's only towards the end that he
actually crosses the threshold of the huge, Gothic-style mansion
where the murder took place.
The
mansion in question was erected by a wealthy recluse, Martin
Greenough, whose talebearers whisper that he made his money as a
bootlegger or found "bushels of diamonds" in South Africa,
but in reality he earned his money in the textile business and
invested his earnings in sound stocks – which soared beyond "the
wildest of wildcat ventures." So he could afford to buy a large
piece of undeveloped land, within the city limits of Boston, where he
erected an enormous gray-stone mansion with battlements, towers and
ivy. And to complete the doom and gloom of the place, the estate was
surrounded by a high wall topped with threatening "spikes of
broken glass."
Greenough
would have lived a withdrawn and unassuming life there, but his four,
older siblings made him the legal guardian and custodian to their
children. No doubt hoping that it would give them an opportunity to
secure a fat inheritance and financially secure their future.
However, Greenough is a capricious devil with three distinct
personalities and "tyrannized over them all." He could be
very kind, lavishing his relatives with expensive gifts, but often
cut them a check in order to get them out of the house for an
extended period of time and his word was always final – even on a
very personal level. Such as his unwavering opposition to his nephews
and niece making an independent living. Cousin Mart, as they called
him, wanted to have control over them and the way to do that was
money.
So
when the family is brought together, to celebrate Greenough's
birthday, things come to a head and not least of all by the bombshell
he himself drops on his relatives.
However,
his nephews also drag a pile of trouble into the mansion. Hutchinson
has married a kleptomaniac, Amelia, who usually takes inexpensive
scarves and powder-boxes from various department stores. The stores,
who know of her character flaw, simply bill her husband for the
things she take, but this time she has lifted a necklace worth
thousands of dollars. Another nephew, Blackstone, brought a woman,
Stella Irwin, who was engaged to his cousin, Francis, but Greenough
had forbidden the marriage. So that made him very unhappy to have her
under his roof.
Greenough
has the last laugh as he drops the biggest bombshell by announcing
his imminent marriage to his long-time companion and mistress, Mrs.
Warden. A widow who has been with him since her husband was alive and
this situation turned out to be deadly cocktail for the old miser. I
know not everyone likes a long, drawn-out buildup to the murder, but
the slow escalation to murder is very well done here and all of the
events in this portion of the story play an important part in the
plot – whether they turn out to be red herrings or actual clues.
Blair and Page evidently knew how to plot a detective story!
Japanese edition |
Anyway,
to show their goodwill towards their guardian, the nephews put on a
firework display on the lawn, while he watches from a second-floor
window, but during this spectacle one of them show him through the
head.
A
note for the curious: during the firework-scene, Francis tells
Hutchinson to be careful, because a spark from his match will put him
"among the angels." So I wonder if this little scene gave
Blair and Page the title for their next book.
Anyway,
Sergeant Moran takes charge of the investigation, because Kane was
still abroad at the time of the murder, but fails in separating the
real clues from the red herrings. So this task comes down to Kane and
his solution does, indeed, recall Ellery Queen's best work. Kane
expertly maps out the movement of the various suspects and how
they're involved, sometimes involuntarily, in the murder and explains
the true meaning behind such clues as marked playing cards, a
love-lorn note and the stolen necklace. And these clues work
beautifully, because they play on assumptions.
There
is, however, a smudge on the fair play element that should be
mentioned. Ho-Ling already noted this in his review
and concerns a clue that was unfairly withheld from the reader, which
knocks this otherwise excellent detective story down a place or two.
I really wanted to place Cat's Paw alongside Murder Among
the Angells, because in every other aspect it was great.
Cat's
Paw has a pleasing, labyrinthine plot with a policeman sleuth,
who acts as an intuitive armchair detective, while sifting through a
pile of physical clues, but the story cheated itself of a place in
the first-ranks by pawning one of the vital clues and hiding up its
sleeve. A real shame. However, the book is still a good read with
enough twists, turns and clues to satisfy the pure, plot-driven
readers, who love Van Dine and Queen, but will probably also be
slightly annoyed that it (unnecessarily) withheld an important piece
of information from them. So make of that what you will.
I loved the twist in this one and thought the family relationships reminded me of some of the Crime Queens’ books: all that infighting among family members, there’s nothing like a dysfunctional genteel family for a classic mystery!
ReplyDelete"...there's nothing like a dysfunctional genteel family for a classic mystery!"
DeleteI agree! And there are three more of such mysteries, in this series, to look forward to!
Would I be right to infer that you would rank this title below 'Murder among the Angells'? I've this double volume sitting on my shelf. :)
ReplyDeleteYes, I would rank this (slightly) below Murder Among the Angells on account of that one clue that was withheld from the reader. However, Cat's Paw is still an intricate detective story full of twists, clues and red herrings. You can actually work out a great deal of the plot from the clues that were given, but withholding that vital clue yanked it from a first-place to a second-place position.
DeleteLove the sound of this one. And your point about clues playing on assumptions is a really good one, I have started to see more and more how vital/helpful that is to a great mystery. Shame about the held back clue.
ReplyDeleteGood news is that, regardless of that one witheld clue, it is still a very good, clue-littered detective story. And the great thing about clues playing on assumptions is that the reader does the fooling himself.
Delete