John
Russell Fearn unexpectedly passed away in 1960, aged 52, when he
suffered a heart attack. A fate he unfortunately had to share with
his father, Percy Slate Fearn, who died under similar circumstances
and influenced Fearn to write a detective novel around "the
consequences of early deaths from heart problems."
Framed in Guilt
(1947) was originally published under the penname associated with his
Maria Black series, "John
Slate," but this is a standalone with Superintendent Henshaw on
duty and was praised by Philip
Harbottle as one Fearn's "most realistic" and "best
locked room novels" – a very personal novel for more reasons
than one. The backdrop and characters of the story were drawn from
his days as a part-time typist for a solicitor's office in Birley
Street, Blackpool.
William Barridge is a
sober, quiet and meek man of forty-four, but looked "a good
twenty years older," who has been married for twenty years and
has three "obstreperous children."
However, it has a
marriage that has gone cold and loveless, because he's stuck in a
dead-end job as head clerk to a solicitor and has neither "the
wit nor the courage to attempt anything better." So luxury,
such as a maid, eludes them and even his children have just enough
respect for him to say goodbye before going to school. And it's not
much better at work.
The dingy offices of
Henry Minton, solicitor and Commissioner-of-Oath, is located on the
first-floor of a converted Georgian dwellinghouse, "smelling of
ink, dry parchment, cold air and Monday morning," which is as
cheerless as it sounds – brightened only by the presence of the
office boy, Jimmy Elgate. A young lad who constantly has his nose
buried in an American pulp magazine. Other two people working there
are the junior clerk, Arthur Standish, and the typist, Sally Higson.
So they slip into the
dull, grinding routine of yet another work day, but the routine is
broken when Jimmy, Sally and Arthur Standish return from lunch and
find the place locked up. Barridge is nowhere to be found.
One thing you need to
know, before going on, that there are two different locks on each
office door. A modern Yale lock and underneath it "preposterous
keyholes" dating back to the days when a dungeon-like key was
needed to (un)lock the doors, which were now redundant except to peek
through. Jimmy decided to take peek through the ancient keyhole of
Minton's locked office and spotted a body lying on the floor with a
large knife protruding from the back.
The body belongs to the
meek and mild head clerk, Barridge, but the only key to the door is
in the constant possession of Minton and, at the time of the murder,
he was in Liverpool on business. So how did Barridge enter the locked
office of his employer, or how did his murderer get out, but what
baffles Superintendent Henshaw even more is why anyone would want to
kill a "harmless, spineless man" – even when evidence
emerges casting the shadow of suspicion on two people. One of these
two suspects, Mrs. Jennifer Carr, surprisingly falls into the
category of cherchez la femme. Or does she?
The detection here is
combination of plodding police work, combing over the crime scene,
checking alibis, questioning people, musing over clues and
possibilities, complimented with bits and pieces of forensic
detective work. Henshaw regularly calls upon the forensic experts to
analyze the dirt under the victim's fingernails, ink on a letter in
order to determine its age and make them do a microscopic examination
of the murder weapon. Fearn was a pulp writer who had a tendency to
indulge in the fantastic (e.g. Account Settled, 1949), but,
sometimes, there are streaks of the Realist
School in his work – both in characterization and setting. Such
as the undistinguished solicitor's office and the normal, everyday
people who work there from the opening chapter. You can also find
these traces in Death
in Silhouette (1950), Flashpoint
(1950) and Pattern
of Murder (2006) with its working class characters and
backdrop.
Needless to say, the
opening chapters and Henshaw's investigation are the best parts of
the story, but the plot and solution has its problems.
My first problem is that
the gist of the solution is kind of obvious and the only reason why
it didn't kill the story are two red herrings, which are used here as
roadblocks to that obvious answer. But you can still figure it long
before Henshaw has worked out all the details. Secondly, the core
idea of the plot is something I detest in detective stories, because,
more often than not, it's just a lazy cop-out on the writer's part.
So it's to Fearn's credit that he succeeded in whipping something
decent and acceptable out of this otherwise hack plot-device, but it
forces me to disagree with Harbottle that Framed in Guilt is
Fearn's best locked room novels.
Admittedly, Fearn tries
to do something else with the locked room mystery here, but he has
written better and much more original impossible crime novels, such
as Thy
Arm Alone (1947) and Vision
Sinister (1954), which doesn't mean I didn't appreciate what
he was trying to do – especially when juggling with two of my big
no-noes. But he has done the locked room better. And when you take a
step away from the locked room angle, you have an overall well-done
plot put together by "a weaver of a perfect crime."
Someone with "the mind of a contortionist" that you can't
help but feel a pang of sympathy for. The personal back-story also
helped me appreciate the book more than I would otherwise have done.
So, all in all, Framed
in Guilt is an interesting and unusual take on the locked room
mystery, but by no means a classic of its kind. I think impossible
crime fanatics and fans of Fearn will get the most out of this story.
A note for the curious:
Philip Harbottle told me about the personal aspects of Framed in
Guilt and provided this endearing image of Fearn as a part-time
typist as told by a man who was a junior office boy at the time: "...this man was from another world... he showed no knowledge of
law, no interest in the clients of the practice and he seldom spoke
to anybody. At regular intervals he just was there, hawk-nosed,
smouldering eyed, apparently unaware of his surroundings. Usually a
cigarette dangled from one corner of his mouth, and one eye was
half-closed against its rising smoke, as two fingers of each hand
pounded the keys of the big, brief-carriage typewriter... faster than
the girls could type with five fingers." Even when doing a
part-time job, Fearn was the consummate pulp writer!
Philip Harbottle, who provided me with the scan of the cover, emailed me the following Challenge to the Reader:
ReplyDelete"However, I do think you should have mentioned that the original hardcover edition (Rich & Cowan, 1947) is Fearn’s RAREST BOOK. It is nowadays IMPOSSIBLE to find a copy in DW. And almost impossible to find ANY copy at all of the hardcover. Bob Adey spent decades trying to find a copy in DW—and had to make do with the colour Xerox I sent him. I do wonder who now owns that copy? And if they realise how rare it is? Here’s a challenge to your readers: I’ll bet my shirt that NONE of them will own a copy of the hardcover edition—unless they were lucky enough to have been offered Bob’s copy after his death."
My guesses who owns that copy now: John Norris, Bill Pronzini or one of the (impossible crime) collectors from China and Japan.