Back in 2012, I reviewed
John Dickson Carr's The
Department of Queer Complaints (1940), published as by
"Carter
Dickson," but my Dell Mapback edition omitted three stories
from the original publication, "The Other Hangman," "New
Murders for Old" and "Persons or Things Unknown," that are
generally regarded as some of his best short stories. Until now,
these stories had completely eluded me.
"Persons or Things
Unknown" was first published in The Sketch, Christmas
Number, 1938, which was later collected in The Department of Queer
Complaints and recently reprinted in an anthology of holiday
mysteries – entitled Murder Under the Christmas Tree: Ten
Classic Crime Stories for the Festive Season (2016). So this is
going to be first holiday-themed review of 2018. However, the
festivities only serves as an ambiance here for "a historical
romance" from the distant days of Charles II.
The story opens during a
house-warming party in a centuries old home, hidden behind a hill in
Sussex, where a group of people have gathered around the fire in the
drawing-room after Christmas dinner. When the conversation drifts
towards the little room at the head of the stairs, the host tells
them the chilling story attached to that room.
A grisly tale of a man who
was hacked to death there, with thirteen stab wounds, by "a hand
that wasn't there" and "a weapon that didn't exist."
An impossible stabbing that occurred there in 1660. Just after the
Restoration.
The story comes from a
diary kept by Mr. Everard Poynter, which ran from the summer of '60
to the end of '64, who owned the neighboring Manfred Manor and was
friends with the then owner of the house with the little room at the
head of the stairs, Squire Radlow – which is how he became a
witness of the inexplicable murder. Squire Radlow's only daughter,
Mistress Mary Radlow, was engaged to be married to Richard Oakley of
Rawdene. A serious-minded, studious, but genial, man several years
her senior. Nevertheless, the match appears to be a good one and the
only obstacle is the potential ruin of Oakley if the sale of his
estate, purchased under the Commonwealth, is declared null and void.
And then a young man appeared in a blaze of glory.
Gerald Vanning was one of
those "confident young men" about "whom we hear so
much complaint from old-style Cavaliers" in the early years of
the Restoration. Over a period of weeks, it became a given that
Vanning would eventually become the Squire's son-in-law. A plan
Vanning had been working towards, but then the news broke that an act
had passed to confirm all sales or leases of property since the Civil
Wars and Oakley was "once more the well-to-do son-in-law"
– finalizing his engagement to Mary. Vanning was out of the
picture, but around the same time "curious rumors" began
to swirl around the countryside about Oakley. Who was he really? Why
did he need over a hundred books? Who was the figure that was seen
following Oakley? A creature that appeared human, but the witness was
not sure if it had been really alive!
On the night of Friday,
the 26th November, Vanning returned to the house and appeared to be
on "a
wire of apprehension" as he kept looking over his
shoulder. Vanning instructed the steward to fetch some servants with
cudgels and they went to Oakley and Mary in the little room at the
head of the stairs. Shortly after he went in, there was a thud and
Mary screaming, but servants found it had been bolted and it was Mary
who unbolted the door with blood on her dress – what was left of
Oakley had fallen near a table. Vanning was immediately seized and
justice threatened to be swift and ruthless, but he tells them he has
not touched Oakley and had not been carrying a sword or dagger when
he came into the house.
So they comb over every
inch of the little room and didn't find so much as "a pin in
crack or crevice." The question is if Vanning or Mary murdered
Oakley, what happened to the murder weapon? If an outsider did the
murder, how did this person enter or leave a bolted room with three
armed servants at the door?
Here you have an inverted
mystery with a historical backdrop and a challenge to the reader to
piece together how the murder was done, which is a fairly clued
challenge, but where Carr demonstrated his craftsmanship is the false
solution that works like a psychological red herring. You rarely get
to see a false solution so nicely positioned next to the actual
explanation that it camouflages it.
Unfortunately, the locked
room-trick failed to take me by surprise, because Carr reused the
idea in a radio-play and the solution immediately occurred to me when
the room was described. And if you know the trick, the clues are
easily spotted. This was hardly enough to keep me from being an
unabashed fanboy and marveled at how the plot stuck together with the
clues. Or how a long-gone of passage in history was briefly opened
through Carr's writing.
On a whole, "Persons or
Things Unknown" can be summed up as an atmospheric historical
mystery and an inverted detective story with a clever locked
room-trick all rolled into one. A minor gem by the undisputed Grand
Master of Detection. Highly recommended!
A note for the curious:
this is an obscure, little-known fact, but John
Dickson Carr is my favorite mystery novelist. Just wanted to
state that for the record.
Mr. Poynter's diary must have been a most interesting volume, perhaps perused by both Mr. Carr and a certain M.R. James. http://www.thin-ghost.org/items/show/137
ReplyDeleteI would not be surprised if they had a copy on their shelves. ;)
DeleteDo you really think this is a true inverted mystery? For me, those always feature an explanation of how the murder was committed, followed by us readers following the detective(s) as he attempts to solve the problem. This is hardly the case here.
ReplyDeleteThere's a variation on the inverted detective story that (pretty much) tells you who committed the murder, but not how it was done (e.g. John Russell Fearn's Except for One Thing and Columbo Goes to the Guillotine). This one definitely qualifies as such an inverted mystery story.
DeleteColumbo Goes to the Guillotine? Are you sure you don't mean Columbo Goes to College?
DeleteNope. There's an episode entitled Columbo Goes to the Gallows and was reviewed on this blog all the way back in 2012, which you can read here.
DeleteThe episode has two seemingly impossible situations: a magician is beheaded inside a locked apartment and a fraudulent medium who can perform distant viewing under rigorous test conditions. A pretty good episode that I can highly recommend.
I meant there's an actual episode titled Columbo Goes to the Guillotines. Not gallows.
DeleteThanks for the tip. In that case, you should also watch Columbo Goes to College - another one where we don't know how the episode's pair of murderers did it - they were with Columbo himself in an auditorium while their victim was killed in a parking garage several floors down, but we don't get shown how until the end.
ReplyDelete*If you haven't see it already, I meant to add.
DeleteMy favourite Columbo where we're not in on the "how" is Blueprint for Murder from 1972... we know the killer hid the body somewhere, but where?
I have seen most Columbo episodes and, if you want some good recommendations, you should definitely watch Try and Catch Me and Any Old Port in a Storm. Two superb episodes with the best and most memorable killers Columbo has ever matched wits with.
DeleteThanks again! I have seen all the NBC Columbos (1971-79), but have not yet seen all the ABC ones from the late 80s and 90s. Eventually...
DeleteI remember that when Any Old Port came out, it was advertised as "Maybe the best Columbo ever!" They might have been right... Donald Pleasence was one of the greatest murderers on that show. Ruth Gordon was no slouch either!
Donald Pleasence is a fan favorite for best murderer of the series, but my vote goes to Ruth Gordon. She's the only one who made me root against Columbo.
Delete