11/11/18

Killing Time: "Persons or Things Unknown" (1938) by Carter Dickson

Back in 2012, I reviewed John Dickson Carr's The Department of Queer Complaints (1940), published as by "Carter Dickson," but my Dell Mapback edition omitted three stories from the original publication, "The Other Hangman," "New Murders for Old" and "Persons or Things Unknown," that are generally regarded as some of his best short stories. Until now, these stories had completely eluded me.

"Persons or Things Unknown" was first published in The Sketch, Christmas Number, 1938, which was later collected in The Department of Queer Complaints and recently reprinted in an anthology of holiday mysteries – entitled Murder Under the Christmas Tree: Ten Classic Crime Stories for the Festive Season (2016). So this is going to be first holiday-themed review of 2018. However, the festivities only serves as an ambiance here for "a historical romance" from the distant days of Charles II.

The story opens during a house-warming party in a centuries old home, hidden behind a hill in Sussex, where a group of people have gathered around the fire in the drawing-room after Christmas dinner. When the conversation drifts towards the little room at the head of the stairs, the host tells them the chilling story attached to that room.

A grisly tale of a man who was hacked to death there, with thirteen stab wounds, by "a hand that wasn't there" and "a weapon that didn't exist." An impossible stabbing that occurred there in 1660. Just after the Restoration.

The story comes from a diary kept by Mr. Everard Poynter, which ran from the summer of '60 to the end of '64, who owned the neighboring Manfred Manor and was friends with the then owner of the house with the little room at the head of the stairs, Squire Radlow – which is how he became a witness of the inexplicable murder. Squire Radlow's only daughter, Mistress Mary Radlow, was engaged to be married to Richard Oakley of Rawdene. A serious-minded, studious, but genial, man several years her senior. Nevertheless, the match appears to be a good one and the only obstacle is the potential ruin of Oakley if the sale of his estate, purchased under the Commonwealth, is declared null and void. And then a young man appeared in a blaze of glory.

Gerald Vanning was one of those "confident young men" about "whom we hear so much complaint from old-style Cavaliers" in the early years of the Restoration. Over a period of weeks, it became a given that Vanning would eventually become the Squire's son-in-law. A plan Vanning had been working towards, but then the news broke that an act had passed to confirm all sales or leases of property since the Civil Wars and Oakley was "once more the well-to-do son-in-law" – finalizing his engagement to Mary. Vanning was out of the picture, but around the same time "curious rumors" began to swirl around the countryside about Oakley. Who was he really? Why did he need over a hundred books? Who was the figure that was seen following Oakley? A creature that appeared human, but the witness was not sure if it had been really alive!

On the night of Friday, the 26th November, Vanning returned to the house and appeared to be on "a wire of apprehension" as he kept looking over his shoulder. Vanning instructed the steward to fetch some servants with cudgels and they went to Oakley and Mary in the little room at the head of the stairs. Shortly after he went in, there was a thud and Mary screaming, but servants found it had been bolted and it was Mary who unbolted the door with blood on her dress – what was left of Oakley had fallen near a table. Vanning was immediately seized and justice threatened to be swift and ruthless, but he tells them he has not touched Oakley and had not been carrying a sword or dagger when he came into the house.

So they comb over every inch of the little room and didn't find so much as "a pin in crack or crevice." The question is if Vanning or Mary murdered Oakley, what happened to the murder weapon? If an outsider did the murder, how did this person enter or leave a bolted room with three armed servants at the door?

Here you have an inverted mystery with a historical backdrop and a challenge to the reader to piece together how the murder was done, which is a fairly clued challenge, but where Carr demonstrated his craftsmanship is the false solution that works like a psychological red herring. You rarely get to see a false solution so nicely positioned next to the actual explanation that it camouflages it.

Unfortunately, the locked room-trick failed to take me by surprise, because Carr reused the idea in a radio-play and the solution immediately occurred to me when the room was described. And if you know the trick, the clues are easily spotted. This was hardly enough to keep me from being an unabashed fanboy and marveled at how the plot stuck together with the clues. Or how a long-gone of passage in history was briefly opened through Carr's writing.

On a whole, "Persons or Things Unknown" can be summed up as an atmospheric historical mystery and an inverted detective story with a clever locked room-trick all rolled into one. A minor gem by the undisputed Grand Master of Detection. Highly recommended!

A note for the curious: this is an obscure, little-known fact, but John Dickson Carr is my favorite mystery novelist. Just wanted to state that for the record.

12 comments:

  1. Mr. Poynter's diary must have been a most interesting volume, perhaps perused by both Mr. Carr and a certain M.R. James. http://www.thin-ghost.org/items/show/137

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would not be surprised if they had a copy on their shelves. ;)

      Delete
  2. Do you really think this is a true inverted mystery? For me, those always feature an explanation of how the murder was committed, followed by us readers following the detective(s) as he attempts to solve the problem. This is hardly the case here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's a variation on the inverted detective story that (pretty much) tells you who committed the murder, but not how it was done (e.g. John Russell Fearn's Except for One Thing and Columbo Goes to the Guillotine). This one definitely qualifies as such an inverted mystery story.

      Delete
    2. Columbo Goes to the Guillotine? Are you sure you don't mean Columbo Goes to College?

      Delete
    3. Nope. There's an episode entitled Columbo Goes to the Gallows and was reviewed on this blog all the way back in 2012, which you can read here.

      The episode has two seemingly impossible situations: a magician is beheaded inside a locked apartment and a fraudulent medium who can perform distant viewing under rigorous test conditions. A pretty good episode that I can highly recommend.

      Delete
    4. I meant there's an actual episode titled Columbo Goes to the Guillotines. Not gallows.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for the tip. In that case, you should also watch Columbo Goes to College - another one where we don't know how the episode's pair of murderers did it - they were with Columbo himself in an auditorium while their victim was killed in a parking garage several floors down, but we don't get shown how until the end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *If you haven't see it already, I meant to add.

      My favourite Columbo where we're not in on the "how" is Blueprint for Murder from 1972... we know the killer hid the body somewhere, but where?

      Delete
    2. I have seen most Columbo episodes and, if you want some good recommendations, you should definitely watch Try and Catch Me and Any Old Port in a Storm. Two superb episodes with the best and most memorable killers Columbo has ever matched wits with.

      Delete
    3. Thanks again! I have seen all the NBC Columbos (1971-79), but have not yet seen all the ABC ones from the late 80s and 90s. Eventually...

      I remember that when Any Old Port came out, it was advertised as "Maybe the best Columbo ever!" They might have been right... Donald Pleasence was one of the greatest murderers on that show. Ruth Gordon was no slouch either!

      Delete
    4. Donald Pleasence is a fan favorite for best murderer of the series, but my vote goes to Ruth Gordon. She's the only one who made me root against Columbo.

      Delete