"A crime has been committed by an unknown assassin, within a short distance of the principal streets of this great city, and is surrounded by an impenetrable mystery. Indeed, from the nature of the crime itself, the place where it was committed, and the fact that the assassin has escaped without leaving a trace behind him, it would seem as though the case itself had been taken bodily from one of Gaboreau's novels, and that his famous detective Lecoq alone would be able to unravel it."- The Argus Newspaper (Fergus Hume's The Mystery of a Hansom Cab, 1886)
Octavus Roy Cohen was a fiction writer who began in the editorial departments of
several newspapers, such as the Birmingham Ledger, Newark Morning
Star and The Bayonne Times, followed by opening his own law practice
when he was admitted to the bar in 1913 – which he closed after only two years
to become a full-time writer. Over the next five decades, Cohen would make a
name for himself as an author of detective stories and comedic fiction, but
also turned his pen to radio, television and movie plays. It was a long and
extensive career.
Jon Breen wrote a short piece about his crime-fiction, "A Note on Octavus Roy Cohen," which briefly touched upon one of his most controversial characters, Florian Slappey, who is now regarded as politically incorrect, but the article is chiefly concerned with Cohen's earliest series-character.
Jon Breen wrote a short piece about his crime-fiction, "A Note on Octavus Roy Cohen," which briefly touched upon one of his most controversial characters, Florian Slappey, who is now regarded as politically incorrect, but the article is chiefly concerned with Cohen's earliest series-character.
David Carroll is a boyish-faced man in
his late thirties and an amateur criminologist of some renown, which is a
talent he often places at the disposal of his friend, Police Chief Eric
Leverage. Between 1919 and 1922, Carroll appeared in four novels and one of
them was once recommended as a locked room novel that was overlooked by Robert
Adey when he compiled Locked Room Murders (1991). I can see why some
would regard the book as a neglected impossible crime story, but I can also
understand why others
would contest their claim. But more on that later.
The book in question is simply titled Midnight
(1922) and takes place during the December reign of King Winter, which had come
with freezing blasts that had turned the sidewalks into sheets of ice and forced
the people to seek refuge "under mountains of blankets" – except for one
taxi-driver, Spike Walters. Spike has to brave the mind numbing cold and navigate
the frozen thoroughfares, but even on a wintry night he's able to pick up a
fare from the steps of Union Station. A veiled woman, snugly wrapped in a long
fur coat, carrying a purse and a large suitcase.
Surprisingly, the handsomely dressed
woman asks to be driven to an address in a poor, rundown neighborhood and
Spike, chilled to the marrow, has a miserable journey, but suffering through
the December gale is only the beginning of his night – as there's a surprise waiting
for him in the backseat. Upon arrival, Spike says "here y'are, miss—No. 981,"
but she does not respond or opens the backdoor of the taxicab. She has
disappeared, but someone else has taken her place: the body of a man, huddled
on the floor, with a bullet wound in the chest! The situations seems like an
impossible one.
I think these first two chapters
constitute the best parts of the story, which excellently set the mood and
wonderfully depicted a city paralyzed by winter. One that has automobile-owners
pouring alcohol into their radiators and cars skidding dangerously across the
icy roads, but also shows its effect on Spike and how the biting cold even made
the scalding, coffee-flavored liquid from the White Star Café seem like a
comfort.
You can almost feel the coldness blasting
from the pages, but, once the police are called in, the plot eases into a
regular, 1920s American-style whodunit and the title of the book can easily be
changed into the Van
Dinean The Warren Murder Case. It was even referred to as such by
one of the characters! Anyhow...
Chief Leverage recognizes the dead man as
Roland Warren, a moneyed man about town, but the professional bachelor recently
got engaged to Miss Hazel Gresham – who's the "kid sister" of his best
friend, Garry Gresham. However, the evidence shows Warren may’ve been planning
to elope, but not with his young fiancé and this makes it even more pertinent that
they find the veiled lady. There are, however, some additional obstacles: the
suitcase yields no clues as to her identity and the victim’s ex-valet, William
Barker, is obviously sitting on important information.
So Leverage threatens bodily harm if
Carroll refuses to butt in on "the taxicab tragedy," but "the
circumstances smacked of the impossible" and "made an almost irresistible
appeal to his love for the bizarre in crime." Carroll eventually manages to
ferret out an explanation from the facts and suspects, which provides an answer
to the seemingly impossible questions haunting the case. However, these answers
will disqualify the story to some as an impossible crime story, because hardly
anything remains of the concept of a locked room mystery once the murder is
seen from the perspective of the perpetrator. It was never the intent of the
murderer to create a baffling and inexplicable crime. But the characters and
reader stumbled across the aftermath of this crime and its remnants gave off
the impression of a locked room on wheels.
Since the double-pronged impossibility from the opening chapter was provided with a rational and logical answer, I decided to tag it as a locked room and impossible crime, but some of you will probably disagree.
So, all in all, a nice and fairly competently plotted detective story, which had a couple of well-written and memorable opening chapters, but the remainder of the book never managed to catch-up with the quality of those chapters. Overall, it was a nice read and I'll probably return to the David Carroll series, because I read some good and interesting comments about Six Seconds of Darkness (1918).
Since the double-pronged impossibility from the opening chapter was provided with a rational and logical answer, I decided to tag it as a locked room and impossible crime, but some of you will probably disagree.
So, all in all, a nice and fairly competently plotted detective story, which had a couple of well-written and memorable opening chapters, but the remainder of the book never managed to catch-up with the quality of those chapters. Overall, it was a nice read and I'll probably return to the David Carroll series, because I read some good and interesting comments about Six Seconds of Darkness (1918).
Thus far this short, lukewarm review. No idea what I'll pick up next, but I'll make an attempt not to overdose on impossible crime stories (like last month) and spread them out a bit.
I genuinely appreciate the time and the thoughtfulness you put into revisiting these unduly neglected authors, who otherwise would be lost in the sands of time. As a fellow enthusiast of these early 20th century authors who are almost pre-Golden Age, I thank you for bringing them again to life.
ReplyDeleteBelieve me, the pleasure of rediscovering these shamefully neglected detective stories is entirely mine, but glad to read you enjoy my ramblings about them.
DeleteThanks TC - I have to confess complete ignorance about this writer until now. Cheers.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, Sergio! :)
DeleteI just discovered that this one is available at Project Gutenberg, so I downloaded a copy. Like you, I have a fondness for "impossible" crimes.
ReplyDelete