Over the past two years, I have had the pleasure of returning to Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express (1934), Death in the Clouds (1935), Hercule Poirot's Christmas (1938) and Evil Under the Sun (1941), which not only stood up to a second reading, but often better than memory had me believe – rekindling my admiration for her nearly matchless talent as a plot creator. I've always thought Christie's best detective fiction can be found in the Hercule Poirot series and some exceptional standalone novels. But never held the Miss Marple series quite in the same regard. That has several reasons.
I prefer the American take on such characters, like Stuart Palmer's Miss Hildegarde Withers, Anita Blackmon's Miss Adelaide Adams and Torrey Chanslor's Beagle Sisters, who always have a little more of a bite to their personality. Their counterparts in Britain can often be a bit too precious and twee, while reeking of rose gardens and Werther's Originals. So never warmed to characters like Miss Marple or Patricia Wentworth's Miss Silver. I wanted to give Miss Marple a fair retrial as personal preferences, or prejudices, can not always escape the process of maturing and fine-tuning – memory is not always the most reliable record to draw from. Least of all mine. I really should have gone with the often recommended A Murder is Announced, but, despite all my gripes, there's actually one Miss Marple mystery I remember enjoying a lot. That has to do with the character of Miss Marple being very different and more interesting than the benevolent maiden aunt she would become in later stories.
Miss Jane Marple, of St. Mary Mead, Downshire, debuted in a series of short stories beginning with "The Tuesday Night Club" (1927) and were gathered under the title The Thirteen Problems (1932). The Murder at the Vicarage (1930) marked Miss Marple's first and only novel-length appearance until Christie revived the character twelve years later in The Body in the Library. Whose personality had altered considerably since The Murder at the Vicarage.
Miss Marple is "the worst cat in the village" who "always knows every single thing that happens" and "draws the worst inferences from it." A horrendously nosy, village gossip who boldly stands in her little garden with binoculars to do a spot of "bird watching." The birds in question being her neighbors and she made their study a hobby to pass the time. Miss Marple calls it observing human nature and in a small village there's ample opportunity to become proficient in one's study, "one begins to class people, quite definitely, just as though they were birds or flowers," which combined with a lifetime of experience allowed her to tackle small, quite unimportant and everyday mysteries – like "that matter of the changed cough drops" or "the butcher's wife's umbrella." I think Miss Marple cast as a gossip mongering busybody with an insatiable curiosity is a much more interesting and effective detective than the Aunt Jane who knits in a corner and quietly observes. The events leading up The Murder at the Vicarage and subsequent fallout gives Miss Marple enough to mull over in her first novel-length outing.
The narrator of The Murder at the Vicarage is the vicar of St. Mary Mead, Leonard Clement, who opens the story with the remark "that any one who murdered Colonel Protheroe would be doing the world at large a service."
Colonel Lucius Protheroe, churchwarden and local magistrate, is "the kind of man who enjoys making a fuss on every conceivable occasion" and gets an opportunity when a pound note disappeared from the offertory bag. So now he wants he wants to go over the church accounts, "in case of defalcations," but there's also trouble brewing closer to home. Lawrence Redding is a young painter who drifted into the village and is using a shed in the garden of the vicarage as a studio to paint a portrait of the vicar's wife, Griselda. When he's not working on the portrait, Redding is painting the colonel's daughter, Lettice, in her bathing dress. Colonel Protheroe found out and old worldly forbade the young artist the house. So the village gossip among each other if there's anything between Lawrence Redding and Lettice Protheroe, but Miss Marple believes the artist is likely involved with quite another person ("that kind of old cat is always right"). Miss Marple is proven correct when the vicar catches Redding in flagrante delicto with the colonel's wife, Anne Protheroe.
This "nasty tangle" finishes setting the stage for murder as, not long thereafter, the body of Colonel Protheroe is found in the vicar's study at the vicarage. Inspector Slack, "a man more determinedly strive to contradict his name," appears to have an open-and-shut case on his hands when Redding confesses to having shot Colonel Protheroe, but a second confession, medical evidence and two perfectly acceptable alibis topples his apple cart. So he has began all over again trying to piece together how a stopped desk clock running fifteen minutes fast ("to induce punctuality"), the scrawled letter the victim was writing with the time neatly printed at the top and the sound of a gunshot that was heard coming from the woods figure in the colonel's murder – which also brings some otherwise peripheral characters into view. Like a man named Archer, "an inveterate poacher," who had been sentenced several times by Colonel Protheroe in his role as magistrate. Dr. Stone, a well-known archaeologist, had recently arrived in the village to lead the excavation of a barrow on Colonel Protheroe's property, but there already been several disputes between the two. Mrs. Lestrange, "the Mystery Lady of St. Mary Mead," went to see Protheroe the night before he was killed. And nobody seems to have any idea what about. So "a lot of queer things about this case."
Miss Marple pops in and out of the story, often at the most opportune moments, until the time arrived to begin tidying up, but it was done in an incredibly anticlimactic way showing Christie was still a few years away from realizing her full potential. Miss Marple simply tells whodunit, why and how, which is then followed by an off-page scene in which the murderer falls into a police trap. It should have been done the other way round. The ending should have come with Miss Marple urging Slack to bait a trap without naming the murderer and concluding with the trap closing to reveal the (hopefully) surprising identity of the culprit, because it would immediately beg for an explanation. Miss Marple can then sit back and answer all the questions in the last chapter. It would have improved the ending considerably.
Regardless of the slightly anticlimactic ending and clues/red herrings not being as abundant as in coming novels, The Murder at the Vicarage is still a very good, solid and early example of the thoroughly British countryside mystery. More importantly, The Murder at the Vicarage gives the reader a glimpse of Christie testing and developing certain ideas that in the years ahead would shape some of her most celebrated and timeless detective novels. Not as polished or fine-tuned, of course, but a clear sign that both Christie and the detective story as a whole were about to go into full bloom. Just a shame this incarnation of the Miss Marple character was abandoned upon her return in The Body in the Library. We could have had a Miss Marple who steamed open letters in The Moving Finger to find out what being written in those scandalous poison pen letters.
I'll absolutely go to bat for A Murder is Announced as near-peak Christie, and I actually do prefer it to Death on the Nile. Admittedly, I'm less fond of that book then most, as I prefer the other Christie book that uses a certain twist (rot13:rivyhaqregurfha), but A Murder is Announced is a top 10 Christie for me. I agree that as a whole Miss Marple isn't nearly as good as Poirot, though.
ReplyDeleteYou're not the only one who has gone to bat for A Murder is Announced. Every single time I make the point how the Miss Marple series never produced a novel that can match the best Poirots and standalones, someone goes "what about A Murder is Announced?" So I'll make it a point to revisit it one of these days for reappraisal and settle the matter once and for all!
DeleteInteresting you prefer rivyhaqregurfha to Death on the Nile, because the only real criticism it usually receives is that the plot and certain character relations are too similar to Death on the Nile. So most tend to prefer the earlier, much more famous Death on the Nile.
I do love Death on the Nile, but I will join others in standing up for A Murder is Announced. It has always been a Christie favourite for me (e.g., a nice hook to grab my attention at the start, fair play clues that make spotting those upon subsequent re-reads fun, depiction of village life after the war, etc.).
DeleteOn the whole though, I agree with you that the Poirot books are better overall than the Marple ones. I believe that comes down to the differing methods of detection between the two. Poirot relies on deduction based on clues and that leads to excellent puzzle plots. Miss Marple is more intuitive based on knowledge of human nature.
See, Anon? This is a review of The Murder at the Vicarage, but everyone is defending A Murder is Announced.
Delete"Poirot relies on deduction based on clues and that leads to excellent puzzle plots. Miss Marple is more intuitive based on knowledge of human nature."
I don't think it's (just) a difference in methods. The detection in the Poirot novels combine physical and psychological clueing with more intriguingly posed plots, characters and memorable settings. That's why the Miss Marple series never produced an equivalent to Murder on the Orient Express or Death on the Nile.
Agree with you. I was trying to make that same point in my reply, but you said it better than I did.
DeleteI like A Murder is Announced very much but The Murder at the Vicarage is probably my favorite Miss Marple (I have the Fontana edition in your first photo). I like it not so much for its plot but for the humorous depiction of the village and its many entertaining inhabitants, conveyed through the vicar's dry, witty observations. I agree with you that most of the Poirot novels are better plotted and puzzled and clued than the Marples. I do like the plot of The Moving Finger very much, but Miss Marple is barely in that book until the very end and we don't see her detecting per se.
ReplyDeleteOne criticism I have of some of Christie's books is perfunctory and unnecessary followup murders, and I read somewhere that she said she was most comfortable with about 50,000 words for her plots, but her publishers wanted there to be 20,000 more than that.
In one way Vicarage has always reminded me of Death on the Nile in that they both have a fun cast of characters.
To Christie's credit, she usually handled those additional murders very well with Death on the Nile being an excellent example on how to pad out a bodycount. I really liked how the perfectly planned murder went array the moment it was executed that necessitated a couple of sloppy, unplanned murders. The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side, on the other hand, represents the other side of that coin. And show why some detective stories should never pass that first corpse.
DeleteAgreed. The subsequent murders in They Do It with Mirrors/Murder with Mirrors I find quite perfunctory as well.
Delete