Maureen
K. Heard was a British author who had a brief, fleeting career as
a fiction writer during the 1940s, producing sevens novel from 1943
to 1948, comprises of four children's books, two detective novels and
a mainstream book – published either under her married name or
penname, "Maureen Sarsfield." Those two, once long-forgotten,
detective novels have been hailed in more recent times as "gems
of the British school."
In 2003, the still sorely missed Rue
Morgue Press reprinted Sarsfield's Green December Fills the
Graveyard (1945) and A Party for Lawty (1948), but gave
their editions new, more genre-driven, titles, Murder at Shots
Hall and Murder at Beechlands.
Tom and Enid Schantz explained their
decision that the original, nondescript titles "may have been
partly to blame" for, what they assumed, "were
unimpressive sales." I kind of liked the original titles. Sure,
they're perhaps "a bit too literary," but fitted the
smartly written, character-driven detective novels that can be ranked
alongside the works of Dorothy
Bowers, Moray
Dalton, Joan
Cowdroy and Elizabeth
Gill. The new titles are too simple and generic.
Sarsfield's lead-character is a
Scotland Yard detective, Inspector Lane Parry, who "twice finds
evil deeds in the backwaters of Sussex" and remember enjoying
Murder at Shots Hall with a slew of poisonings surrounding a
bombed, partially destroyed manor house, but Parry got upstaged by
one of the characters, Flikka – a young sculptor who lives and
works at the manor house. So I always wanted to read the second novel
and, looking for a non-locked room mystery, I decided to finally take
Murder at Beechlands from the big pile.
Murder at Beechlands finds
Inspector Lane Parry stranded in a drift by the side of the road, "feet deep in snow," with his car refusing to move another
inch. A raging snowstorm has turned the Sussex landscape into a
white, practically impassable, hellscape.
Parry decides to follow "an
enormously high, forbidding stone wall" on foot in the hope of
finding a lodge or gate, but half expects to find a derelict mansion,
prison or a mental institution behind the fortified wall obviously
intended "either to keep people out or to keep them in."
What he found convinced Parry he had stumbled his way to a private
lunatic asylum, where the inmates were loudly screeching ("Lawty!
Lawty! Lawty!") and fighting in the snow, but the woman, Mrs.
Anabel Adams, who he had pecked as the matron turned out to be the
owner of Beechlands Hotel. A small, financially troubled country
hotel with a less than spotless reputation in the region. And they
were hosting a party in honor of a well-known, womanizing World War
II Wing Commander, Lawton "Lawty" Lawrence.
A party not everyone turned up to on account of the snowstorm and the hotel is practically empty when Parry arrived.
The people who did make it to the
hotel are Jim Bridges, severely burned during the war, who had lost
his wife to Lawty when he lay "all mashed up in hospital"
and Christie Layne had lost her virtue to the bomber pilot, but they
were there strictly on the invitation of Mrs. Adams. Cintra Norton is "the greatest film star we ever sent to Hollywood" and
used to be friends with Lawty before he went abroad. Marigold Trent
is a natural platinum blonde, who was sent down by some very old
friends of Mrs. Adams, but she hadn't paid her bills since she
arrived. Lastly, the party is rounded out by the hotel receptionist,
Miss Killigrew, and two London businessmen, Julian Frake and Paul
Livington, who might be willing to invest money in Beechlands – one
of the reasons why they were invited by Mrs. Adams. She wanted to "suitably impress" them.
And now, this unlikely party is
trapped together in the partially empty hotel for the night.
Something that would not have been a problem had it not been for
Lawty's battered body underneath the window of his room. Parry
quickly deduces Lawty's death wasn't an accident or suicide, but cold
blooded murder!
Normally, a raging snowstorm is used
as nothing more than a device to confine the characters to a single
location, but Sarsfield used it to wage a war of nerves on her
characters as the lights begin to slowly die and incidents keep
happening. A second body is discovered in the boiler room, but Parry
keeps this second death a secret "to keep everyone on such
tenterhooks" that, whoever committed the murders, "get in
such a state of nerves he'll give himself away." Parry is
assisted in mounting the tension by several attacks, professionally
disabled phone lines and the unlucky past of the hotel with its
unnerving, ghostly taps said to be heard before someone dies, but
even Parry is not immune to his gloomy, nerve-stricken surroundings
and wonders how long he would "be able to go on keeping his
temper."
So, when it comes to handling
atmosphere and tension, Sarsfield's Murder at Beechlands is
what Ngaio Marsh tried to do with the abysmal Death
and the Dancing Footman (1942).
Where the plot is concerned, the
journey to the ending was better than the solution, which was not bad
or atrociously clued, but found it underwhelming with only the motive
standing out, because usually, this type of motive is only mentioned
in (Golden Age) detective stories – not often used as an actual
motive for the murderer. One of many (small) signs in this book that
times were slowly starting to change for the traditional detective
story. Nevertheless, Murder at Beechlands is a busily plotted,
eventful detective story that keeps you reading and has a few
memorable setpieces.
I mentioned that one of my reasons for
picking Murder at Beechlands is that it's supposed to be a
non-impossible crime novel, but technically, I should label this post
as a locked
room mystery. And there two of them!
Firstly, there's knocking and yelling
from behind the locked door of the room where the bodies are kept,
but they never get an opportunity to consider it a locked room
mystery because the situation immediately resolves itself with a very
simplistic explanation. But still, it made for a great scene.
Secondly, one of the characters vanishes from the snowbound hotel and
is not found when the place is searched, which gives it the
appearance of locked room mystery, until you learn the solution. So
these minor, quasi-impossibilities doesn't make Murder at
Beechlands a long-overlooked locked room novel, but appreciated
Sarsfield flirted so heavily with my favorite detective story trope.
It also gave me this dreadful feeling that she actually wrote and
completed a third, full-blown impossible crime novel, but the
unpublished manuscript got lost and any trace of it was lost to time.
Because that's how it usually
goes.
So, all in all, Murder at
Beechlands is a mostly well-written, excellently characterized
and atmospheric treatment of the snowbound murder mystery, only
marred by an underwhelming solution, but, like RMP, you have to
wonder where Sarsfield's career would have brought her had "she
continued in the vein of these two books."
Sorry to hear that the end wasn't up to the mark coz the plot is one I love, snowstorm, nerves and all.
ReplyDeleteDon't worry. Even without an ending worthy of Agatha Christie, this is still a good read that's perfect for the winter days.
DeleteYou beat me to it! I’m 40 pages from the end. But it being my second time reading this I already know what happens. I always hoped there might be a hidden Sarsfield out there—but I guess that’s a lost cause.
ReplyDeleteIt's not out of the question Sarsfield wrote a third, or even more, novels, but experience has taught me that, if they didn't get published, the manuscripts are most likely lost to history. I dedicated two blog-posts to this phantom library of lost and unpublished manuscripts (here and here).
DeleteGlad to see Sarsfield getting some more attention. I reviewed this one a while back and read Murder at Shots Hall pre-blog. The Rue Morgue Press were brilliant for pointing me in the direction of fairly obscure mystery writers. It is a great shame they had to stop operating.
ReplyDeleteRue Morgue Press was instrumental in bringing about the genre's current Renaissance Age. I don't think it would have been the same, or as successful, without Tom and Enid helping pave the way.
Delete