Herman Landon was a
Swedish-born American writer best remembered for his pulp stories and
novels about a reformed arch-criminal, "The Gray Phantom," but
how did the obscure, largely forgotten Landon appear on my radar –
since he was even omitted from the GADWiki.
Well, Robert Adey listed two of his regular mystery novels in Locked
Room Murders (1991). I know, I know. You're stunned with
surprise.
The two impossible crime
novels listed in Locked Room Murders are the plainly-titled
Mystery Mansion (1928) and the more intriguing-sounding Three
Brass Elephants (1930), alternatively published as Whispering
Shadows, which concerns the disappearance of "a
red-and-black room that had contained a body." I haven't
tracked down either of these titles yet, but I did stumble across
another one of Landon's locked
room mysteries. One that was entirely overlooked by Adey!
The Back-Seat Murder
(1931) immediately plunges the reader in the middle of a dark, murky
and ominous plot that begins in the cellar of Peekacre. The country
home of a well-to-do businessman, Christopher Marsh.
Leonard Harrington is the
private secretary of Christopher Marsh and, "a little after two
o'clock in the morning," is raking an ash pile in the cellar,
but he's caught in the act by the live-in nurse of Mrs. Marsh,
Theresa Lanyard – who asks him a startling question. She asks him
if he thinks the cellar is "the place where David Mooreland was
murdered." Seven months before, Mooreland disappeared before he
could "lay certain unpleasant facts before the authorities"
that would probably have resulted in a lengthy prison term for Marsh.
Mooreland had visited Peekacre on the day of his disappearance, but
the house was searched and not a trace was found.
So the pseudo-private
secretary believes Marsh has destroyed the body to the best of his
ability, but had "failed to realize that even in a raging fire a
body can't be completely obliterated." Harrington has found a
gold tooth in the ash pile that already been identified. Who are
Harrington and Lanyard? What links them to the missing and presumably
dead Mooreland?
All these questions
remain unanswered, for the time being, but they decide to work
together to prove Marsh has murdered Mooreland to save his own neck.
And here the plot begins to thicken considerably.
On the following morning,
Marsh dictates a letter addressed to the attorney prosecutor of the
county, James C. Whittaker, but the content is unsettling to
Harrison. Marsh brazenly accuses the newly-minted partners in crime,
Harrington and Lanyard, of plotting his murder and the former is
ordered to deliver the incriminating letter, in person, to Whittaker
– which is when two utterly impossible situations follow each other
in short succession. The first impossibility occurs when Harrington
has been driving for forty-five minutes and glances in the rear-view
mirror to see "the course, crafty and malevolent countenance of
Christopher Marsh" in the back-seat.
Harrington had been going
between thirty-five and forty miles an hour. He was the sole occupant
of the car, which is confirmed by the garage owner who changed the
car-battery after he left Peekacre, but somehow, Marsh had
miraculously appeared in the back-seat of the car! An impossibility
very reminiscent of Edward
D. Hoch's "The Theft of the Bermuda Penny," collected in The
Thefts of Nick Velvet (1978), but in that short story someone
disappeared from the back-seat of a car going seventy miles an hour.
Marsh has a gun and tells
Harrington to drive to an old, abandoned mountain top hotel, where he
plans to dispose of him, but, when they arrive, Marsh is murdered in
the back-seat – stabbed in the neck while Harrington was looking
him in the eyes! They were the sole occupants of the car. Three of
the four doors were locked and the fourth door, unlocked, was on the
right side of the driver, but no mere mortal could pull off "a
murder in such stealthy fashion" without being seen by
Harrington. The windows were closed and there were no footprints in
the soggy dirt road surrounding the car.
A solid premise with an
intriguing, double-barreled impossible situation, but Landon was
unquestionably a second-string mystery writer and The Back-Seat
Murder reads like a cheap dime novel.
There a number of shady
and sinister personalities moving in-and out of the story. Such as
the scrawny blackmailer, Samuel B. Tarkin. After Marsh is murdered,
Harrinton finds Lanyard in the abandoned hotel with strange man,
Harry Stoddard, who calls her "a lying, cheating, two-faced,
double-crossing crook." The elderly and obliging Martin Carmody
had lent his car and chauffeur to Lanyard on her "mysterious
mission" to the hotel. Rounding out the list of suspects is the
dangerous, thickset Roscoe Carstairs.
They're all
unconvincingly-drawn, paper thin stock-characters who are annoying
secretive about their motivations and act only in service of the
plot, which makes it appear only the murderer acted semi-logical
throughout the story – because this character actually had a reason
to act like that. But, on a whole, the characterization is very poor.
However, there's a good,
undeveloped pulp-style short impossible crime story buried in The
Back-Seat Murder. The attorney prosecutor, Whittaker, acts
as the primary detective of the story, but a chunk of the credit for
the work has to go to a county policeman, Storm, who has "the
right kind of brains for this sort of job." Admittedly, they
did a fine job in selling the impossibilities as they go over all the
possibilities and this convinced me the solutions were either going
to be good or pretty bad. Luckily, they were more good than bad.
The solution to the
seemingly impossible appearance of Marsh in the back-seat of a
speeding car was something you would expect from a locked room yarn
by Hoch. I assumed Marsh had simply emerged from the empty space
under the back-seat, but this was a pleasant surprised. The second
impossibility, stabbing in a locked car with an innocent eye-witness,
is rooted in the traditions of the pulpiest of impossible crimes
(c.f. John Russell Fearn's Account
Settled, 1949) and certainly is an original, one-of-a-kind
trick, but a lack of clues made it hard to swallow. However, Landon
made a sporting attempt to produce a fairly clued, last-minute
surprise, but one of the chapter-titles in the table of content
ruined that party. So avoid it like its Julian Symons.
I don't remember who of
you said that a case can be made that good ideas should be taken away
from bad writers, but The Back-Seat Murder should be entered
as Exhibit A. The impossible situations in the locked car were
original and genuinely baffling, which were actually played to good
effect, but Landon simply was not good enough to fully deliver on
them. So you'll end up with a mixed, poorly written bag of tricks.
Still... I didn't
entirely disliked it. Yes, this mainly has to do with the originality
of the two impossible crimes. Landon was a second-string (perhaps
even third-string) writer of pulp stories and dime novels, but
appeared to have contributed some interesting and original titles to
the locked room library. So you can expect me to return to Landon at
some point in the future, because I'm an unrepentent locked room fanboy.