Athur Ernest
Ashley was a British novelist, who started out as a painter and
decorator, but turned to writing popular fiction in the 1930s and
balanced his literary career with being a circuit lecturer on a
variety of topics "ranging from crime to bee-keeping" –
two subjects he would later integrate into a detective novel (The
Singing Masons, 1950). Ashley had furthermore worked as an
assistant editor at The Nottinghamshire Free Press and was one
of the founding member of the Nottingham Writers' Club. But what we
are interested in here is his two-decade long stint as a now
long-forgotten mystery novelist.
Ashley wrote
under the name of "Francis Vivian" and produced nearly twenty detective novels in as many
years.
One of his
recurring series-detectives was Inspector Gordon Knollis, of Scotland
Yard, who purportedly "never picked up an undisclosed clue"
and appeared in ten mystery novels that were published between 1941
and 1956, which have never been reissued since their original
publication – until now. Dean
Street Press has the entire series scheduled for republication on
October 1, 2018, and they kindly send me a sample of some of these
upcoming releases.
The
Elusive Bowman (1951) is the seventh entry in the series and has
a plot, as the book-title suggests, which draws on the noble,
time-honored sport of archery. I would call the book a better and
stronger archery-themed detective story than either John Bude's The
Cheltenham Square Murder (1937) or Leo Bruce's Death
at St. Asprey's School (1967).
Michael
Maddison is a robust, healthy man of thirty-five who, unaccountably,
had buried himself in a small, unassuming place called
Teverby-on-the-Hill. There he acquired the tenancy of the village
pub, Fox Inn, which he turned into something more than a
watering-hole for villagers and commercial travelers, because
Maddison believed pubs should be "centres of communal life"
and "homes-from-home for travellers." Something he
succeeded in admirably. The remodeled place provides a club-home to
the Teverby Bowmen. An archery club boasting twenty-six shooting
members under the leadership of a passionate archer, Captain
Saunders.
So everything
appears to be quiet, peaceful and even prosperous in
Teverby-on-the-Hill, but the reader soon learns there's a dark side
residing behind the genial facade of Maddison.
Maddison has
moved to Teverby-on-the-Hill together with his unmarried sister,
Rhoda, and his young niece and ward, Gillian, who had been orphaned
in the London blitz, but Maddison reveals he has a very private
reason for preventing them to get married – even saying he would go
as far to commit murder to prevent it. Or undoing it. He even hits
Rhoda with his fist "clean on the side of the jaw" when he
caught her eavesdropping. Nevertheless, Rhoda and Gillian intend to
marry Captain Saunders. So they begin to think about murdering
Maddison. And they're not the only one.
One evening,
Captain Saunders brought two hunting arrows to the Fox, a
bodkin-pointed one and a broadhead, capable of "piercing
armour-steel from a respectable distance." Major Oliver had
seen hunting bows in Mongolia that could "kill a yak at forty
yards" and did believe there were modern, Western bows and
arrows that could do that. So Captain Saunders brought two arrows to
show him, but they go missing by the end of the evening and turn up
again the following day when Maddison is found in the recently
remodeled and enlarged cellar of the Fox – a green and white
fletched arrow sticking from his rib. A second arrow, similarly
fletched, was deeply embedded in the door of a cupboard.
The Chief
Constable decides to ask Scotland Yard for assistance and they
immediately dispatch Inspector Gordon Knollis to the village.
A map of Teverby-on-the-Hill |
Inspector
Knollis is assisted by Inspector Lancaster, of the Maunsby police,
who'll probably endear himself to a lot of long-time mystery readers,
because he constantly forces Knollis to explain his deductions. A
fun, little rib-poke at the detectives who love to mutter cryptic
remarks and keep their thoughts to themselves. However, you should
not assume Lancaster is simply a plot-device that lays bare the
detective's thought process to reader. One of the chapters, entitled "The Deductions of Lancaster," has him deducing the hiding place
of "seven prettily feathered arrows" and Knollis had
completely overlooked this place.
So they make
a pretty good investigative team and are exactly the kind of
policemen needed to disentangle this complicated mesh of deception
and contradictions.
There are
only four suspects, Rhoda, Gillian, Capt. Saunders and Maj. Oliver,
who have closely-linked motives and suspiciously moved around the Fox
at the time of the murder, which effectively muddled the water –
keeping the reader moving between (combinations of) suspects. A
problem further complicated by a hidden blackmail plot and the
all-important questions why Maddison had converted the cellar for
private archery practice and whom he had been plotting to kill. My
only complaint is that the red herrings are so thick that they
obscured the genuine clues and this somewhat diminished the fair play
aspect of the plot.
On a whole,
The Elusive Bowman is a well-written, straightforward
detective novel with a good, but relatively simple, plot stuffed with
clues and red herrings complicated by the cross-actions of the small
cast of characters. So a good and solid introduction to the work of a
long overlooked mystery writer, who reminded me of Francis
Duncan, but without frills and tighter plots. I'll definitely be
coming back to Francis Vivian for a second serving.
Interesting your comparison to Duncan. Both Knollis and Tremaine are very likeable humanist detectives. That I see at once. However Vivian is not as mature in his writing which is more commercial and less literary than Duncan (despite Vivian's frequent odd literary allusions). Maybe that's what you mean by "without frills." I agree he is on par with Duncan as a plotter and storyteller. These books remind me more of what George Bellairs could have done if he dispensed with his inept attempt to imitate Henry Fielding and stopped all the nonsensical village life ridiculing. Vivian also has a sharp satiric eye but never lays it on as thick as Bellairs who tended to include some intrusive non sequitar scene where some utterly minor character makes a cameo in a pub or market or bus or train only so that Bellairs can make fun of him. Unlike Bellairs all of Vivian's characters live their lives in service of the plot rather than appearing only to amuse the writer himself. The servants in THREEFOLD CORD, for example, are intrinsic to the story and have large roles, are interrogated multiple times by Knollis, and have crucial evidence to give. In the hands of Bellairs servants would enter, Littlejohn would question them once, Bellairs would belittle them in the process, and then make them disappear altogether from the book.
ReplyDeleteIn addition to THE THREEFOLD CORD I've also read DARKLING DEATH (found and purchased cheap reading copies of vintage editions) and plan to have my reviews up in time for the release of the new Dean Street Press editions. I ordered three other titles in the reprint editions because they sounded so intriguing and were too scarce (or absurdly expensive) to find copies in the used book market.
Yeah, that was what I meant with the frills and you might be right that Vivian is closer to Bellairs than to Duncan, but I only read the dreary, dismal The Cursing Stone Murder. So that comparison was not as obvious to me. When I began to read this one, I kept thinking of Duncan. A note for the curious: Duncan and Vivian began to write mysteries in 1937 and published their last one in 1959. Yep. They're not only (IMO) similar writers, but their careers ran concurrent with each other.
DeleteYou're not exactly make it inviting to return to Bellairs, but The Threefold Cord has my interest now. And looking forward to your reviews.
Thanks for the review. :) Given how many of Vivian's novels are being reprinted, I'm hopeful that there will be another title offering a stronger puzzle plot. Looking forward to the reviews!
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, Jonathan! There will be another Vivian review up a week from now.
DeleteThat’s an interesting comparison to Bellairs, I wasnt impressed with his from this era either.
ReplyDeleteWhat did you think of the Francis Duncan comparison?
DeleteHave read no Francis Duncan. I had never heard of the author until he was reprinted.
DeleteIn that case, it would be interesting to see what you make of Duncan. And my comparison. I recommend So Pretty a Problem.
Delete