The Straw
Men (2013) is the twelfth title in Paul
Doherty's "the Sorrowful Mysteries of Brother Athelstan,"
a series of historical mysteries that originally appeared under the
name of "Paul Harding," which emerged from a decade-long dormancy
with Bloodstone
(2011) and a red-thread runs through these novels – culminating in
The
Great Revolt (2016) of 1381. Normally, I tend to skip through
these series without paying too much heed to chronology, but the
Great Uprising brewing in the background made me decide to read these
later novels in the correct order. You have to respect history.
The Straw
Men takes place in January, 1381 and begins when Sir John
Cranston, Lord Coroner of London, is waiting with a comitatus of
mounted men-at-arms in "the bleak-white wilderness" of
winter. Cranston has been tasked with escorting the Flemish allies of
the self-styled Regent of England, John of Gaunt, to the Tower of
London, but the Flemish have brought a prisoner with them. A hooded
woman on horseback with a masked face. As to be expected, this
retinue with escort is ambushed by the Upright Men, members of the
Great Community of the Realm, who plot "to root up the past"
and "build a New Jerusalem by the Thames" – only to fail
in their objective. And this is not the only setback the Upright Men
suffered.
Brother
Athelstan is the parish priest of St. Erconwald's in Southwark,
secretarius to Sir John Cranston and is the Father Brown of
the 14th century.
Several days
after the attack, Cranston fetches Athelstan and asks him to
accompany him to a tavern near the Tower of London, called Roundhoop,
where he has trapped some of the Upright Men, but they've taken
hostages and threaten to fight to the death – unless they can speak
with the Dominican friar. Probably to negotiate a safe passage out by
river. However, the situation dissolves into a bloodbath and
Athelstan can only listen to the dying words of their masked leader
("tell my beloved to continue gleaning"). These last words
were not meant as a dying message, but it became one by the end of
the story. I thought that was an interesting use of the dying message
that I had not seen before.
So the
opening of The Straw Men is packed with battles and bloodshed,
but all of this was only the prologue. After these events, a murderer
begins to stir within the bulwarks of the Tower. The result of this
is a handful of seemingly impossible murders!
The first of
these miraculous crimes occurs when John of Gaunt is entertaining his
guests with his personal troupe of stage actors, known as the Straw
Men, when two arrows, out of nowhere, cut down two of the guests as
two heads inexplicably appear on stage. However, the unseen loosening
of these arrows and planting the severed heads on stage turned out to
be more of a quasi-impossibility. But the next impossible murder is a
genuine locked room mystery.
One of the
Straw Men, Eli, is murdered in a tower room by a crossbow bolt to the
face, but the door was "locked and bolted" from the
inside, while the eyelet in the door was immovably stuck in place by
old-age and the window was tightly shuttered – both from within and
without. The solution to this locked room conundrum is not bad at
all. It's as simple as it's elegant and deftly combines technical
trickery with human psychology to create the illusion of an
impossible murder. Even more importantly, it was fairly original in
its execution.
There are two
more locked room slayings in the second half of the story and they
were cleverly linked together: two men are found dead in their
respective tower rooms, one room is situated directly above the
other, in which one man appeared to have hanged himself and in the
room below someone was stabbed to death. The two-pronged solution to
these two locked room murders aren't terribly original or have the
same level of synergy as The
Case of the Séance's Double Locked Room from Detective
Conan, but liked them nonetheless. They were a nice little
extra.
This is still
only a fraction of the entire plot. Athelstan and Cranston have to
contend with spies, conspirators, political secrets and a litany of
gruesome murders. A hangman is brutally slaughtered and an entire
family, except for a baby, is wiped out. So you can forgive an
overworked Athelstan that only caught sight of the murder long after
the reader has identified this person.
Everyone
who pays a modicum of attention and has a passing acquaintance with
Doherty's detective fiction can spot the murderer long before the
end, which is my sole problem with this otherwise solid entry in the
series. The Straw Men
is a fast-moving, intricately plotted historical detective novel
packed with impossible crime that fascinatingly inches closer to the
Peasants' Revolt of 1381 – only slightly marred by the obvious
murderer. I find it fascinating how Doherty is slowly, but surely,
shepherding this series towards the Great Revolt and plan on
returning to Athelstan sooner rather than later.
A couple of months ago, I tried reading one of Athelstan's mysteries(the second one), but I gave up quickly: The prose was needlessly wordy and Cranston was beyond annoying.
ReplyDeleteBut with plots like the above, I can't help but think about giving him a second chance. After all he seems one of the few good guys left and I usually like historical mysteries.
For the moment, I started the book again and hope for the best...
TomCat I think you prefer his egyptian mysteries, right?
I very much liked the Judge Amerotke series, my first exposure to Doherty, but do not prefer them.
DeleteDoherty is a historian who knows how to paint convincing picture of the distant, fur-flung past and don't have a special preference for any of his period series, but the ones set in medieval England do tend to stand out. On the other hand, Murder in Thebes is arguably his best locked room mystery. So, no. I can't say I have a special preference for a specific series or period.
I hope your second attempt at Athelstan and Doherty will fare better than the first.
Thanks! It went ok. I finished it a while earlier, it was actually not bad, once I got used to it...
DeleteI have some gripes with the plot (the locked-room mystery is so simple it perhaps could have done without) but I'm inclined to try another one in the future.
I will try another one of his in the future.
Doherty's locked room tricks tend to be hit or miss and usually have simple explanations. Even the really good ones. A Murder in Thebes has a good one and really liked The Mysterium, which has two of those minor impossibilities. The Spies of Sobeck has a incredibly cheeky locked room trick that only works in a historical setting. So perfectly acceptable in a historical mystery. If you ever wondered what would happen if Robin Hood ever wandered into a detective story, The Assassin in the Greenwood is for you.
DeleteAs for as his non-impossibilities go, I remember The Demon Archer being pretty good.
So hope this helps you pick a good one whenever you decide to give Doherty a second shot.
Thanks for the suggestions! I'll try one of these, possibly the one in Thebes!
DeleteThe impossible crime in the tower room from A Murder in Thebes is, IMO, one of his best and most innovative locked rooms. I hope you'll like it.
DeleteThe Straw Men takes place in January, 1831
ReplyDeleteI'm assuming the date is a typo?
Yes, the date is a typo. I changed it to the correct date (1381). Thanks for pointing it out.
Delete