John
Pugmire of Locked Room International
published an English translation of Paul
Halter's L'arbe aux doigts tordus (The Vampire Tree,
1996) in December, 2016, but decided at the time to give the book a
pass, because I remembered a damning review that was posted on the
now erstwhile forum of the JDCarr website
– lambasting everything from the weak plot to the illogical
behavior of the cardboard characters. So even at the time, when
Halter was still an inaccessible enigma behind the language barrier,
I was not enticed by this particular title.
My
initial plan to give The Vampire Tree a pass began to fell by
the wayside shortly after reading La
chambre du fou (The Madman's Room, 1990), which was a
good take on the "room that kills" and actually left me wanting
to read another Halter. And that left me with only one option.
So
how bad could the book really be, I reasoned. After all, I also
recall some negative reviews of Carter
Dickson's Behind the Crimson Blind (1952) that suggested
the entire plot consisted of H.M. chasing prostitutes and stabbing
dodgy, low-life characters in the streets of Tangier – which you
have to agree is an unfair assessment of the book. Sure, Behind
the Crimson Blind is still at the bottom of the H.M. series,
alongside with And
So to Murder (1940) and Seeing
is Believing (1941), but it was still very readable mystery.
I had the hope that this much maligned title by Halter would turn out
to have a similar upside.
Well,
that was not the case and somewhat regret my decision. The Vampire
Tree is almost as poor a detective story as Le
roi du désordre (The Lord of Misrule, 1994). Yes...
this is going to be one of those reviews.
The
Vampire Tree does have all the necessary ingredients of an
arch-typical Paul Halter detective novels, "legends, witches,
ancient crimes, sadism, premonitory nightmares," while the past
and present begin to inextricably intertwine. Naturally, one of the
crimes is of the seemingly impossible variety and occurred a hundred
years before the opening of the story. Unfortunately, Halter was
unable here to produce the same result as he did in previously
mentioned The Madman's Room or L'image
trouble (The Picture from the Past, 1995). But let's
begin at the beginning.
The
main story-line takes place in the 1950s and concerns a newlywed
couple, Roger and Patricia Sheridan, who were world's apart, but had
one thing in common – neither of them had any close relatives.
Patricia was orphaned during the London Blitz during the Second World
War and Roger inherited "a comfortable future" from his
wealthy parents. An inheritance that included the remnants of an
ancestral mansion that stands in the village of Lightwood, in
Suffolk, which Roger fixed up to serve as "the cosy nest of
their dreams." However, the place has a peculiar history of its
own that will come back to haunt them.
During
the reign of Henry VIII or his son Edward, the village was plagued by "a series of child murders" and the person who was held
responsible was an apparently young and beautiful woman. Liza Gribble
had the face and body of a young woman, but the wrinkled hands of an
old crone. So the villagers assumed she was not only witch, but a
vampire as well and she had drank the blood of her victims to become
a youthful-looking woman again. Gribble was hanged and buried beneath
the titular tree. A tree that stands on the grounds of the Sheridan
residence and played a role in another murder case that took place a
hundred years ago.
One
of Roger's great-grand-uncles, Eric, became engaged to the daughter
of a neighboring landowner, Lavinia, who died mad when Eric was
murdered under seemingly impossible circumstances. On a harsh winter
evening, they threw a ball at the Sheridan home and it was a great
success, but when Lavinia went to sleep that night she had a
terrifying nightmare about the menacing, twisted tree coming alive
and strangling her fiancé, which became reality when she found his
body the following morning sprawled beneath the tree – strangled
him to death. But the peculiar, inexplicable part is that there was
only a single set of footprints in the virgin snow and they belonged
to Eric!
Patricia
had a similar nightmare the first time she slept in the house and
decided to read Lavinia's diary, which becomes somewhat of an
obsession and she's not the only one. Roger begins to develop a habit
of calling her Lavinia. And then there's the present-day murder case.
A serial killer who targets children, slits their throats and
disposes of their drained bodies in the wooded area surrounding the
village.
On
paper, The Vampire Tree had all the potential to become a
good, if not excellent, detective novel, but Halter evidently did not
have his head in the game and was unable to bring any of the
plot-threads to a satisfying conclusion. And this exemplified in the
ineptitude of Dr. Alan Twist and Inspector Archibald Hurst. You've to
wonder why Halter decided to include them, instead of making this a
standalone novel, because they're completely useless here. Twist even
admits towards the end that he considers "the case to have been
one of my failures" and he only got "a glimpse of the
truth."
Only
contribution Twist made to the case was explaining Patricia's phobia
of bright lights and why she had an "insurmountable fear of
touching crosses," but it was Patricia who eventually hit upon
an explanation for the impossible murder that occurred there over a
century ago – which (alas) was an extremely poor one. I also loath
this type of solution for any kind of locked room murder or
impossible crime. I'd rather a writer use hidden passages, poisonous
animals or a long-lost twin to explain a miraculous murder than
spring this kind of explanation on me. An explanation that completely
destroys the essence of an impossible crime. On top of that, it was
also badly executed, poorly motivated and required some (natural)
fortuity to work.
So
I was not exactly impressed by the impossible crime element of The
Vampire Tree and was even surprised that Pugmire, who specializes
in publishing locked room mysteries, picked this one to translate.
I'm sure it has something to do with publishing rights, but this is
the kind of book that would chase away new readers who picked up
because the title sounded intriguing.
Anyway,
the plot-thread of the present-day serial killer proved only to be
slightly better, but not much, which had an interesting motive that
was actually foreshadowed and this allowed the reader to make an
educated guess about the murderer's identity. Not exactly
old-fashioned fair play, but Halter did drop a couple of good hints
and (admittedly) the reason why the killer drained the children of
their blood showed Halter could be clever and original. As did the
double-alibi of the murderer. However, this was hardly enough to save
the book and there's another thing about the solution that annoyed me
more than anything else in the story.
Early
on in the book, Patricia meets an elderly man on the train, Thomas
Fielding, who travels to historical or haunted places in order to
soak in the atmosphere and this personal interest helped him to
"formally identify the perpetrator" – or, rather, he "sensed" the truth. However, Fielding only went around telling
people he knew who was behind the child killings, but the only
precaution he took was sending a letter to Dr. Twist. A letter that
arrived too late, but here's the kicker: in the letter he told Twist
he fully expected to be murdered by the man he had refused to tell
everyone about. He actually suspected this person to silence him and
he let it happen without lifting as much as a finger. And even worse,
his death did nothing to help capture the murderer. What an idiot.
I
believe the last time people vainly sacrificed themselves, like that,
was when Aztec men mounted the steps of the Great Pyramid of
Tenochtitlan to voluntarily have their hearts cut of their chest in
an attempt to stop the Spanish conquest.
So,
to make a long story short, I very much disliked The Vampire Tree.
Halter has always been an uneven mystery writer and plotter, who
tends to divide opinions, but The Vampire Tree is far below
the dozen, or so, titles that preceded it in translation. Halter can
do so much better and hope the next one, which will probably be
published later this year, is a return to that Halter. And I'll try
to pick something better for my next post.
If
you want a second-opinion on this book, "JJ" of The Invisible
Event, wrote a more nuanced review.
See, I really quite like the impossibility here -- I know it's kind of a cheat (a bit?) in the eyes of some, but I think it'd make a superb short story. Alas, that aside, I can't entirely disagree wtih your assessment elsewhere on this one: it feels a bit like a lot of ideas that never quite gel in the way Halter's unusual narratives tend to.
ReplyDeleteAh, well, can't win 'em all. I remain a fully signed-up fanboy and am eager to see what comes next!
To each their own, and all that, but how anyone who likes impossible crime fiction can like that kind of explanation is beyond me.
DeleteSecret passageways are ancient and playing around with wires, or placing the key in room after the door is broken down, is old hat, but at least they're legitimate tricks to create an apparently impossible crime. The “trick” here, which I have seen too often, completely destroys the point of a locked room or impossible crime and consider it to be a cheat. And a lazy cheat at that!
All of that being said, I hope the next one is going to be one of the titles I have been looking forward to for years. Pugmire always skips the ones I really want to read (e.g. Barbarossa's Curse, Penelope's Web, The Traveller from the Past, The Twelve Crimes of Hercules and The Crime of Daedalus). Surely, one of them has to come up for translation soon!
There's clealry some sort of rights issue, as you say, the determines what's up for translation -- alas, I don't even know if it's possible to establish the pool of books from which John Pugmire is able to choose. Someone else may have a better understanding of the situation than I, however. Actually, yeah, I'd say that's defintely true...
DeleteThanks TomCat for the review. :) I, too, disliked the solution to the impossible crime. As a whole I found myself more tolerant of the novel, once I decided to read it as a horror story instead of a mystery.
DeleteThe Halter titles you listed sound interesting. I recall reading about some of them from Patrick's blog, and wishing LRI would release them!
Ah, yes. You can blame Patrick for making me very curious about The Traveller from the Past.
DeleteFor everyone interested, here's a link to the page with links to all of Patrick's reviews of Paul Halter.
Ah, what's the point of reviewing when you hit most of my points, but better? :P I actually did like some of what it touched on in the end, since it was sufficiently creepy/interesting to me, but the rest was meh.
ReplyDelete---The Dark One
Excuses, excuses! You'll never get that first review of 2018 out of the way with that attitude.
Delete