"There is a great deal of wickedness in village life. I hope you dear young people will never realize how very wicked the world is."
- Miss Marple (Agatha Christie's "The Blood-Stained Pavement," collected in The Thirteen Problems, 1933)
The ingenious and sardonic Anthony
Berkeley was one of the founding members of the London-based Detection
Club, who foresaw and participated in the popularization of the
psychological crime novel, which he did under the byline of "Francis Iles," but
he's primarily remembered today as one of the more original and innovative
minds from the genre's classical period.
Berkeley's ingenuity sprang from a
cunning mind that was willing to experiment with the form of the detective
story and embrace new ideas. This is very evident in the characteristics of one
of his series characters, the energetic Roger Sheringham, who's one of the most
likable amateurs to ever don the figurative deerstalker, but as prone to
fingering the wrong culprit as the reader – which also makes him one of the
most relatable detectives in the genre. Sheringham snugly fits the mold of "the
fallible detective," which was cast by E.C. Bentley in Trent's
Last Case (1913), but Sheringham was unparalleled when it came to being
wrong (e.g. The Poisoned Chocolates Case (1929) and Jumping Jenny,
1933).
Just like Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle and G.K.
Chesterton, Berkeley has a number of tricks, plots and storytelling ideas
to his credit that were adapted and turned up in the works of other writers: a
false solution from Roger
Sheringham and the Vane Mystery (1927) fuelled the plots of some
well-known detective novels by John
Dickson Carr, Nicholas
Blake and Edmund
Crispin. The basic plot-structure of The Silk Stocking Murders
(1928) became the basis for Agatha
Christie's The ABC Murders (1936) and Panic Party (1934)
seems to have been the model for And
Then There Were None (1939) and William Golding's Lord of the Flies
(1954).
These influential works are accompanied
by some excellent, first-rate detective stories such as The Piccadilly
Murder (1929), Jumping Jenny, Trial and Error (1934) and the
subject of this blog-post – a splendidly written, cleverly plotted and well
characterized tale of a poisoning case in a small village that would have made
Christie proud.
Not to Be Taken (1938) is a standalone novel and is narrated by Douglas Sewell, a
fruit farmer and a countryside gentleman, who notes halfway through the story
that, if his account "is to be considered as a detective story," he's
telling it quite wrongly. As he had only just reached "the point at which a
detective story usually begins," but reconstructing the recent past and
bringing "the dead to life again in all the trivial details of everyday life"
is necessary for assigning the roles for the engaging, fully fledged cast of
characters who are about to play a part in a small-scale drama. Berkeley was
not only a shrewd plotter, he also knew how to write a story around those plots
populated with fairly convincing characters.
The narrative spun by Sewell begins with
his next door neighbors, the Waterhouses, where the first signs of a domestic
tragedy begin to manifest themselves.
John Waterhouse is a retired electrical
engineer with a distinguished career behind him as "a kind of roving
contractor," who was known, particularly in the East, as the man to call "when
any native ruler with plenty of money" and "yearning for bright lights"
was contemplating to wire his jungle capital – which resulted in several
adventurous episodes and a respectable bank account. He settled down in the
small village of Anneypenny, Dorset, to please his wife, Angela, but the
restless workhorse soon picked up a hobby: masonry and construction.
Construction is a useful pastime that
provides the villagers with work and extra money, but Waterhouse has never been
a penny-pincher, which made him a popular figure in Anneypenny. However, when
the story opens, "the embodiment of robust health" has fallen ill and
has been plagued with severe bouts of indigestion. The cause of the illness is
placed on a developing gastric ulcer and his doctor advised him to cut down on
his smoking, follow a diet and take his medicine. But that was to no avail: he
"died a painful and a messy death" after a sick bed of five excruciating
days.
The US title of Not to Be Taken |
His doctor and a close friend of Sewell,
Glen Brougham, was somewhat surprised, but signed a death certificate stating
epidemic diarrhoea as the cause of death and Waterhouse would have been buried
as one of those many examples, littering graveyards everywhere, of an
unfortunate soul who passed away before his time – if it weren't for the
interference of his brother.
Cyril Waterhouse is very skeptical
towards the official cause of death and Sewell wonders whether he had picked up
grains from the local rumor-mill, before deciding to descend on the village,
but a post-mortem examination supports his suspicions.
A quantity of arsenic is discovered in
the body of John Waterhouse and this casts a wide net of suspicion. Cyril
strongly suspects his sister-in-law, Angela, who's the sole beneficiary under
her husband's will and can look forward to a fat paycheck from his life
insurance – which is as good a motive for murder as her extra-marital affair. It’s
also suggested Glen Brougham might have made a mistake in preparing the
prescription, which would make it manslaughter and might cost him his career as
a physician. The Waterhouses employed a German woman, Miss Mitzi Bergmann, who
acted as a companion-secretary to Angela and was often ragged by John about the
Nazi system, but on the eve of the inquest she flees from the country.
These are just a handful of the possible combination
arising from the character-driven prelude of the first half and an examination
of the hard facts during the inquest in the second half, which also involves
Sewell himself, his wife, Frances, and the doctor’s sister, Rona. Before the final
chapter, Berkeley threw down the gauntlet and wrote an Ellery
Queen-style "Challenge to Reader," which asks several questions pertaining to
who and how John Waterhouse was poisoned – as well as asking the reader if he
thinks if the story contained, what he called, a "Dominant Clue." Berkeley
delivers on the promise given by the premise and the tantalizing challenge,
because the explanation is very clever and satisfying. I completely missed the central
and dominant clue, but was pleasantly surprised to see the murderer give the
kind of response I always wanted to see a murderer give to an old-fashioned
deduction. However, I do not think this one really deserved to get away with
it.
The final sentence closed the book on a
note that was so unusual, unconventional and open-ended that it can only be
described as stereotypical Berkeley. It was good and strong enough for Nicholas
Blake to use it as an ending for his admitted masterpiece, Head
of a Traveller (1949). So there's another piece of work seemingly
inspired by Berkeley.
So, all in all, Not to Be Taken is
another example of why Berkeley remains such a popular writer among
connoisseurs of vintage crime-and mystery stories: he simply was one of the
best.
Well, I really have to get this one - thanks TC. I read a bit of Berkeley decades ago (POISONED CHOCOLATE, JUMPING JENNY, MALICE AFORETHOUGHT) but never came across this one - cool!
ReplyDeleteIt's not as well known as some of Berkeley's other detective and pyschological crime novels, but more than worth the time and effort in tracking down a copy.
DeleteThanks for the strong recommendation, which made me feel very pleased that I managed to snatch a copy of 'Jumping Jenny' and 'Not To Be Taken' just before Langtail Press novels ran out of stock. :D I'm slightly kicking myself for not having grabbed 'Second Shot' as well - but then again I was probably influenced by the fact that the other two Berkeley titles I read after 'Poisoned Chocolate Case' just weren't quite as good. 'Piccadilly Murder' and 'Murder at the Basement' were delectably humorous, but just not quite as clever.
ReplyDeleteYou should read Jumping Jenny before Not to Be Taken, because Berkeley out performed himself in that one. It's as grand as The Poisoned Chocolates Case, but without its artificiality and has actual characters and a great plot/ending poking fun at the meddling, fallible detective.
DeleteI've been staying away from 'Jumping Jenny' as I like to save the best for the last. Or rather, so that I can console myself that there is still one great Berkeley novel saved up for that rainy day in the future... For the same reason, I've yet to read Ellery Queen's 'Greek Coffin Mystery' or John Dickson Carr's 'He Who Whispers' or Edmund Crispin's 'Swan Song'...
DeleteI genuinely wish I had done something similar when I burned through most of the top-tier GAD authors. Now I only have some bottom-rung EQ novels, some historical Carr's and none by Crispin to look forward to. Oh well.
Delete