"A sensitiveness to fair play and sportsmanship is perhaps the best protection against the abuse of power..."- Robert H. Jackson
During the first two weeks of this year,
I reviewed three of the five mystery novels in the Anthony "Algernon" Vereker
series, The
Pleasure Cruise Mystery (1933), The Ginger
Cat Mystery (1935) and The
Spirit Murder Mystery (1936), which were recently reissued by the Dean Street Press – prefaced
with a new introduction by genre historian and professional detective-fiction
enthusiast, Curt Evans.
Robin Forsythe was the man who put his
name to these forgotten gems and began to work on this short-lived series,
clipped short by his death in 1937, while serving a prison term for his initial
poke at contriving a criminal scheme. In the end, it proved far more profitable
for Forsythe to confine his cleverly contrived schemes and tricky plots to the
printed page. You can find some details about the Somerset House stamp case in
my review of The Pleasure Cruise Mystery and Evans' introductory piece
to his work, but that's ground I have trodden before. So lets move on the
subject at hand.
The subject of this blog-post is the
second novel in the "Algernon" series, The
Polo Ground Mystery (1932), which opens with a newspaper report on the
mysteries enshrouding Mr. Sutton Armadale's death – a rather well-known and
wealthy financier.
A mortally wounded Sutton Armadale was
found on the private polo grounds of his palatial home, Vesey Manor, during the
early hours of the morning: bleeding from a gaping gunshot wound in his abdomen
region and a second bullet had gone clean through the head. Armadale was
tightly clasping an automatic pistol, but suicide seems an unlikely explanation
for the shooting. The gamekeeper who came across the body, Stephen Collyer,
heard his employer murmur one last word, "murder," before drawing his
last breath of air.
It was "subsequently discovered that
the secret safe in the library," which was not as secret as it should have
been, had been rifled and a "famous rope of pearls" had been taken – a
rope that had been valued at a cool 20,000 pounds. A mask was found on the
floor of the library. So it's entirely possible Armadale could have been gunned
down while pursuing a burglar, but the strew of people who surrounded the
victim could all be fitted in the role of murderer in half a dozen possible
scenarios.
The stolen pearls belonged to Armadale's
second wife, Angela, who treated him more as "a rich fur coat than a husband,"
which is why everyone considered them to be "an ill-matched pair."
Evidently, Armadale agreed with the general opinion about their marriage,
because he left everything he owed to his nephew, Basil Ralli, who was rather
surprised since his uncle disapproved of his fiancé – wanting him "to marry
some one of good birth." The fiancé is the daughter of the gamekeeper, Miss
Trixie Collyer, who has a disgruntled admirer, Frank Peach, in the former
underkeeper of the estate. But he was released from his duties by Armadale.
There was also a "small party of guests" present at the manor, which
included a Belgian cabaret singer, Miss Edmée Cazas, a well-known polo player,
named Captain Fanshaugh, Mr. Ralph Degerdon, Mr. Aubrey Winter, who's a cousin
of Mrs. Armadale, and one of her friends, Stanley Houseley.
Shooting happened against the backdrop of
a financial crisis, known "The Great Brady Crash," which left "a hideous
trail of suicides by poison, coal-gas, disinfectants, fire-arms" and "cold
water," but, sadly, had little bearing on the overall plot – otherwise I
could have padded this review with references to E.C. Bentley's Trent's Last Case (1913)
and Cyril Hare's Tenant
for Death (1937).
A Classy Mugshot of R. Forsythe |
Well, that’s how the situation stood when
Anthony "Algernon" Vereker, gentleman artist, appeared on the scene as a
special representative of the Daily Report and "as a sort of
unofficial helper" of Detective-Inspector Heather of Scotland Yard. But
they generally go about as friendly rivals with different approaches. Vereker prefers
to find out "why the crime was committed and thence by whom," while
Heather tries "to discover how the crime was committed and thence by whom,"
but, as is common in Forsythe's work, the beating heart of the plot were the
mystifying circumstances in which the body was found.
Who and why are as important as in any
other traditionally plotted detective story, but the answers to these questions
are always provided by clearing the confusing surrounding, what I call, the "crime-scene
conundrums," of which Forsythe was an absolute master. In The Pleasure
Cruise Mystery, it was the sudden death of a woman whose gloved-covered
hands were inexplicably cut and bruised, while The Spirit Murder Mystery
confronted the reader with two bodies in a barren field – one of them with a
crashed skull and the other with non-fatal gunshot wound. Forsythe spun some
clever, twisted and original plots from
these premises, which is no different here.
Vereker and Heather realize the murder of
Armadale was not an ordinary shooting, because they're not even sure how many
shots were fired or even how many firearms were involved. And then there’s the
original motive for the shooting. A motive that sprang from a tense situation
on the polo ground. So the combo of the murderer, motive and opportunity was
very well done, which is something I have come to expect from Forsythe. Same
can be said about the characterization and the witty dialogue. But I still had
a problem with the overall story: it seemed too long. Like an overextended
short story.
Yes, I said the plot was clever and
original, which it is, but not on the grand scale as the previously mentioned
Forsythe mysteries and even with a questioning half a dozen suspects, burglary
sub-plot and a friendly rivalry there was still time for Vereker to loiter
around the grounds – even having time to make charcoal studies of the woods. It's
even mentioned in one of the chapters that, as a landscape painter, Vereker was
having a wonderful day. Even the busman's holiday-type of mystery novel usually
don't allow the detective that much leisurely time. So the opening and ending
chapters were really good, but the middle-section had patched that looked
suspiciously like padding. Very well written pieces of padding, but padding
nonetheless.
To make a long story shot, Forsythe is an
early contender to be my best discovery for 2016, but that’s mainly on account
on the three previously reviewed titles, which were really excellent examples
of classic, Golden Age mysteries. Again, not that The Polo Ground Mystery
was bad, but not as good as the other.
Well, that only leaves Missing or
Murdered (1929). I sure hope the Dean Street Press will not wait too long
with reissuing Forsythe's three standalone mysteries. I'm particularly
interested in Murder on Paradise Island (1937). Sounds like a blast.
Anyhow, I'm not sure when the next review will be posted, but I can tell you it will be tangibly related to my favorite mystery writer.
I'm very tempted by Robin Forsythe but I'm a bit dubious about Dean Street Press - aren't they one of those publishers who censor the old books that they reissue?
ReplyDeleteIn an interview I did with DSP, the publisher Rupert Heath said he only removed one racist term. Here is a link to the full interview:
Deletehttps://crossexaminingcrime.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/a-behind-the-scenes-look-at-reprinting-the-golden-age-interviewing-the-dean-street-press/
I'm vehemently opposed to sanitizing fiction from a bygone era to accommodate modern sensibilities, because it's falsifying history, but, luckily, remained limited to that single phrase in one book. So don't rob yourself from the overall catalogue that DSP has brought back in print and Forsythe in particular.
DeleteI'm afraid that with me any censorship at all is a deal-breaker. It's the thin end of the wedge. It's necessary to let publishers like DSP know that if they censor we won't buy their books.
DeleteI wish I was as strong in my resolve as you in this instance, because I completely agree with you, but I couldn't drop DSP over one deleted word.
DeleteI've dropped other publishers who censored and even reordered entire paragraphs, but, in this case, I simply couldn't - especially if it goes no further than this one instance.
I admit, I'm a little surprised that this seems to be such a common view among mystery bloggers. Not objecting, mind you, (far from it!) but merely interested.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThe flesh is weak in this instance, Dark One. I could not drop DSP over this one instance, but I wish he had not deleted that word. Publish as a story was originaly written or do not publish it all. So I really hope it won't go any further than that.
DeleteI enjoyed reading your review, especially with the comparison you make to other Forsythe novel. I think out of the 5, my favourite novel is The Spirit Murder. The Polo Ground Mystery is probably my second favourite as I really enjoyed the ties to Oscar Wilde either in direct reference, in dialogue style and in the relationship between Algernon and Ricardo. Though I do agree that Algernon has a tendency to over-theorise.
ReplyDeleteI preferred The Pleasure Cruise Mystery over The Spirit Murder Mystery, with The Ginger Cat Mystery as a close third, but the series as whole is simply marvelous.
DeleteCompletely agree about the dialogue and relationship between Algernon and Ricardo, which is probably why Pleasure Cruise is my favorite: Ricardo has a greater presence in that book and therefore there's more interestion between him and Algernon. Plot was also excellent.
I found Ricardo's role a bit troubling in Pleasure Cruise, in regards to the ending. I think also what made PC a poorer read was the pacing of the last third of novel which was excruciating slow.
DeleteWow, sounds great - thanks TC.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, Sergio!
Delete