Gordon Philo was a
British diplomat and magic aficionado with a background in the secret
intelligence services who, reportedly,
was "instrumental in the processing and circulation of the
material revealed by Russian double agent Oleg Penkovsky,"
which revealed the presence of Russian missiles in Cuba – a move
that prevented "a catastrophic third World War." More
importantly, Philo co-authored a handful of classically-styled
detective novels with his wife, Vicky Galsworthy Philo.
Diplomatic Death
(1961) was the first novel to be published under their shared
pseudonym, "Charles Forsyte," but the introduction revealed that
the period between the first draft and publication was a long,
arduous journey.
During the 1950s, Philo
worked at the British Consulate-General in Istanbul, Turkey, where
whiled away the winter evenings reading detective stories and decided
to would be more entertaining "to write one myself." So he
began to work on a plot and had drafted several chapters, but
abandoned the fledgling manuscript when his wife returned to
Istanbul. Some years later, the manuscript was "resurrected from
a drawer," completed and they entered it in a competition, but
the judges commented that the ending, while original, was wrong –
back "the manuscript went into the drawer." Very likely,
the drawer is where the manuscript would have stayed had it not been
for a chance meeting with a member of the Detection
Club.
Vicky was standing at a
bus stop in Maida Vale, London, when "a passing taxi was hailed
by another lady in the queue" who "asked if anyone else
would like to share it with her." Vicky accepted the offer and
discovered that her companion was "the well-known mystery
writer," Christianna
Brand!
When Brand heard Vicky
had co-written an unpublished mystery novel, she advised her to
contact her literary agent, but the agent returned exactly the same
answer as the judges. So they re-wrote the whole book, which was
finally accepted and published in Britain and the United States. A
great "prologue" to a wonderful detective story that even
challenges the reader to spot "the original ending." I
think I may have spotted the original solution and agree with the
experts that it would been the wrong kind of solution for the story,
but ditching it robbed the story of a murderer with an iron-clad
alibi dipped in solid concrete. However, it was a necessary
sacrifice.
Diplomatic Death
begins with the arrival of Inspector Richard Left, of Special Branch,
in Turkey on a quasi-secretive mission concerning a murder and
disappearance at the British Consulate in Istanbul.
Two days before Left
arrived, the Consul-General had been working late when the sound of a
gunshot emanated from his office and two Vice-Consuls in the opposite
room immediately investigated and found the Consul-General slumped in
his chair – an automatic lay on the desk and "the unmistakable
smell of powder" in the air. Hardcastle and Westers, the
Vice-Consuls, checked for a pulse, but the Consul-General was "stone
dead." So a senior official is called, Mr. Bretherton-Fosgill,
but when they returned to the office, the body of the Consul-General
had disappeared!
They combed through the
garden, searched the vehicles in the courtyard and turned the whole
building inside out, which even turned up "an endless grimy
brick tunnel" between floors nobody knew existed, but without
any result. So they decided to lock the office and sealed the door in
two places with sealing wax, stamped with signet rings, until "a
proper investigation can take place." Diplomatic Death
has an entry in Robert Adey's Locked Room Murders (1991), but
the impossibility listed is the closing of a safe-door and the
presence of an item in the office at the time it had been securely
locked and sealed. And not the quasi-impossible disappearance of the
body. However, these aspects of the case are never treated as actual
impossibilities, but as smaller pieces of a bigger puzzle and my
advise is not to the read book solely for its locked room elements.
A knotted, tangled
headache of a case that Left is tasked with unsnarling and you can't
help but sympathize with the long-suffering, underdog policeman who's
frustrated in every way imaginable, which began with "the
purgatory" of a long, uncomfortable plane ride to Turkey and
continued even at his hotel. A dirty, rundown place where noisy
cabaret artists returned at all hours of the night and the shattering
sound of the aged, under-lubricated laboring of the automatic pump of
the large cistern on the roof filled Left's hotel room – keeping
him awake until the early hours of the morning. And then there are all
the dead-ends, red herrings and lack of tangible evidence.
Nevertheless, you should
not assume Left is one of those modern, bungling detectives who
accidentally stumbles to the correct solution by sheer luck. Left
constructs a clever and logical false-solution based on an office
chair, a sound recording, a key and a limb arm. This false-solution
cracked, what could have been, a cast-iron alibi like an eggshell! A
perfect use of the false-solution.
John Norris, of Pretty
Sinister Books, wrote in a 2014 blog-post, "The
Detective Novels of Charles Forsyte," that when Diplomatic
Death was first published Forsyte was compared to Agatha
Christie and Ellery
Queen, but John thought "a more apt comparison would be
Clayton
Rawson" whose "impossible crime mysteries are inspired
by stage illusionist's bag of tricks." Something you can
definitely see reflected in the both the false and correct solution
in this novel, but the plot, setting and the detective also reminded
me of the impossible crime stories of Peter
Godfrey. I wonder if Godfrey's Death Under the Table
(1954) is one of the books Philo had been reading during the
mid-1950s. I know Death Under the Table wasn't widely
circulated outside South Africa and is somewhat of a rarity, but
therefore not unlikely to turn up in the library of the British
Consulate in Turkey. Diplomats who read detective stories would have
easier access at the books not published in the Britain or the United
States.
I was able to work out
the correct solution based on exactly the same clues that Left used
to get there, but this takes nothing away from how clever and fairly
the whole plot was handled. A plot that could have been
disappointing, or unconvincing, were it not for the excellent way in
which setting was utilized, which created the time and space needed
to make the trick work. A setting not merely limited to the British
Consulate, but ventures out into the then still young Turkish
republic of Atatürk where the ancient and modern world came together
on the streets of Istanbul. The dual setting of the British Consulate
and Istanbul where absolutely instrumental in making both the plot
work and give the story a distinct personality of its own, which
would have even made the story standout had it been published two or
three decades earlier.
Sadly, this means you can
count Forsyte, like Kip
Chase and John
Sladek, among the Lost Generation of Golden Age-style mystery
writers who had the misfortune to arrive on the scene too late to be
fully appreciated. What's even sadder is that their work is now
perhaps a little too recent to be revived in our current Renaissance
Age.
So, on a whole,
Diplomatic Death is not only a very well-written, fairly clued
mystery novel with a plot hearkening back to the golden days of the
detective story, but a strong debut without any of the real flaws
often found in such works. A highly recommendable first that has made
me even more curious about the other Forsyte novels listed in Locked
Room Murders and in particular Dive into Danger (1962),
which apparently deals with the impossible (underwater) murder of a
treasure hunter and a circle of suspects comprising of marine
archaeologists. How can anyone resist such a premise?
To be continued...
Dude, I can't keep up with these posts -- have you stopped sleeping or something?
ReplyDeleteSounds like another fabulous, unheralded gem, and a great title to dig out of the annals of Adey. Man, I could do with something completely unexpected and wonderful...
You know that I'm (currently) way ahead of schedule, grinding down considerably at the moment, but, if you want something unexpectedly good and wonderful, why not track down a copy of the book I emailed you about? You can synchronize your review with mine. I promise it will reinvigorate you.
DeleteWorry not, I have a copy of that already and it's due a read and review soon. But it's also hardly unexpected, since you've already told me how great it is -- plus, well, you've been wrong about these things in the past... ��
DeleteNow, look here. Just because I recently had a disagreement with my past self about Van Gulik's The Chinese Gold Murders doesn't mean all my past judgments are invalid. They might be a slightly less infallible, but infallible nevertheless.
DeleteThe backstory to the book is so interesting.
ReplyDelete