Lewis G. Robinson was a
medical officer in the British Army during the First World War and
wrote three very obscure, army-themed detective novels, The
Medbury Fort Murder (1929), Tell No Tales (1931) and The
Manuscript Murder (1933), published as by "George Limnelius"
– a reference to his mother's maiden name, Limmel. Robinson also
penned an inverted mystery novel under his own name, The
General Goes Too Far (1936), which was adapted as the motion
picture The High
Command (1937).
The Medbury Fort
Murder is perhaps the least scarce and most interesting title of
three mystery novels Robinson wrote under the Limnelius name.
Robert Adey described The
Medbury Fort Murder in Locked Room Murders (1991) as "a
straight locked room novel" that "rises above most of it
contemporaries by virtue of the excellent writing and
characterization." John Norris, of Pretty
Sinister Books, lauded
the book as "one of the most unique novels" from the early
20th century, because it's both "an inverted detective novel"
and "a true detective novel" – while Martin
Edwards called it a "terrific book." So, with such
glowing recommendations, the book rocketed to the top of my (locked
room) wish list, but it took me some time to finally get around to
it.
Admittedly, The
Medbury Fort Murder is an excellently written piece of detective
fiction with surprisingly (for the time) mature characterization and
an ambitious plot twisting, and reshaping, the inverted detective
story.
The Medbury Fort
Murder opens with a lengthy introduction of the characters,
spearheaded by Major Hugh Preece, Royal Army Medical Corps, who's a
serious-minded medical officer with only "a few flirtations"
and ''temporary connections of a more intimate character"
under his belt, but has now fallen in love with Prunella Lake – a
small part musical comedy actress. They have a short-lived, but
earnest, fling "interrupted by the outbreak of the Great War."
After which Prunella married the then future Sir Tremayne Ronan and
Major Hugh started a family with Claire Chisholme.
Ten years come and go,
Hugh receives a letter from Prunella asking him to meet her to chat
about old times, but they end up spending the night together,
secretly, in a hotel room. And nine months later, Prunella finally
gives birth to her first child and passes the boy off as Sir Ronan's.
This was supposed to be a secret between only two people, Hugh and
Prunella, but Lieutenant Charles Lepean has gotten wind of their
little secret. Lieutenant Lepean is best described as a vile,
blackmailing miscreant.
The other potential
suspects introduced in these chapters are Captain Wape, Lieutenant
Harris and Private Swansdick, who'll be with Hugh the primary
suspects of the impending murder at Medbury Fort – one of "the
chain of forts in the Thames and Medway Defenses." This part of
the story also include a brief, richly detailed flashback to an
episode in West Africa, which had a glimmer of that memorable,
second-half of Christopher St. John Sprigg's The
Corpse with the Sunburned Face (1935). George Limnelius was a
good writer who knew how to spin a yarn with characters acting like
actual human beings, but Limnelius also proved himself to be a very
proficient plotter.
John Norris suggested in
his previously mentioned review Limnelius seems to have been inspired
by Anthony
Berkeley's mystery novels. I don't think this is true, because the
only typical Berkeley novel he had written at the time was Roger
Sheringham and the Vane Mystery (1927) with Jumping
Jenny (1933) and Trial
and Error (1937) still being in the future, but The
Medbury Fort Murder certainly resembles them by inverting the
inverted detective story.
In a letter, Prunella
tells Hugh that Lieutenant Lepean "must be silenced,"
because they'll both be ruined if their secret is exposed or "else
bled white." Hugh and Lepean happen to be both stationed at
Medbury Fort.
So, Hugh begins to plan
the murder of Lieutenant Lepean and takes inspiration from a
well-known classic of the locked
room mystery, but, when Lepean is murdered with surgical
precision behind the locked door of his bedroom, it becomes doubtful
he actually committed the murder – or did he? There are only three
other viable suspects, Captain Wape, Lieutenant Harris and Private
Swansdick, where the only ones who could possibly have had access to
the officers' quarter at the time of the murder. You can only reach
the stone stairs leading to the officers' quarters and mess by
passing through the guard room, which had been constantly guarded by
either one or three soldiers. So not only is this a locked room
puzzle, but also a very tight closed-circle of suspects.
A problem complicated by
the presence of three possible murder weapons: a surgical knife, a
West African machete and "one those obsolete, long, curved,
French bayonets." A problem reminiscent of G.K. Chesterton's "The Three Tools of Death," collected in The
Innocence of Father Brown (1911), but here it was not used
quite as effective. The clues themselves also turn out to be somewhat
troublesome. Who oiled the lock on Lepean's bedroom door and why was
the key stolen after the door was broken down? More importantly, the
murderer appeared to have employed a different kind of locked
room-trick than the one Hugh had planned on using.
Limnelius deserves credit
for handling the impossible crime, because normally I would hate
these creaking, dated and shopworn locked room-tricks.
There are two (false)
solutions proposed to the impossible murder that many readers have
seen before, which can also be said about the last and correct
solution. However, I can't remember any other locked room story
pre-1929 using this exact explanation. I know of a mystery novel from
1931 that used it, but not one predating The Medbury Fort Murder
and, keeping this in mind, the ending probably worked better in 1929
than in 2019 – because the timeworn explanations was followed by an
original one. A very simple solution that can be seen as an inversion
of the locked room problem.
The way in which
Limnelius structured and presented the murder of Lieutenant Lepean
reminded me of Leo
Bruce's Case for Three Detective (1936). We have a murder
in a locked bedroom investigated by three detectives, under the
guidance of Chief Inspector McMaster, who gather various pieces of
evidence and try to fit to one or more of the suspects. The result is
an engagingly written, solidly plotted and mostly satisfying
detective novel with a nice surprise packed away at the end.
There are, however, a
couple of minor smudges. I don't think the clueing is as strong as it
could have been, which helped make the surprise a genuine surprise,
and the explanation as to what happened in the locked bedroom
required a pretty big coincidence. Some modern readers, like Aidan of
Mysteries Ahoy (his review
can be read here),
might have a problem with the classist attitudes aired and imposed on
the characters. Chief Inspector McMaster even confidently states that
in "the history of crime" there's "no single case of
a murder of violence having been committed by an educated man,"
which is reflected in the motive of the murder.
If you can look pass
these imperfections, you'll find an excellently plotted and
characterized detective novel in the tradition of 1930s Anthony
Berkeley that made surprisingly good use of some old, tired locked
room tropes. So, yes, highly recommended!
Sorry to nitpick, but aren't you confusing Anthony Boucher and Anthony Berkeley?
ReplyDeletePointing out a mistake is not nitpicking. I have corrected it and thanks for letting me know!
DeleteThanks for including a link to my review. I think you make some great points, not least that the solution that I felt was stale was relatively fresh at the time. Maybe I will have to give it a second look.
ReplyDeleteYou should give the book another chance, but just hold off on rereading it for a couple of weeks. I have another review of an obscure, army-themed mystery with a fortress setting from the same period lined up for the end of this month and it made me appreciate The Medbury Fort Murder even more.
DeleteIntriguing! I look forward to reading about it...
Delete