"Revenge is sweet and not fattening."- Alfred Hitchcock
After
an hiatus of five years, Jonathan
Creek returned to the small-screen nearly eight years ago
with an entertaining and promising New Years special, The
Grinning Man (2009), which received irregular followups in
the succeeding years – culminating in a short season consisting of
three episodes in 2014. Sadly, the quality of these episodes and
specials left a lot to be desired.
The
Judas Tree (2010) was an abomination of an episode and represents
an all-time low in the series. Yes, some of the poorest and mediocre
episodes, such as The Seer of the Sands (2004) and Gorgons
Wood (2004), were definitely superior to whatever that atrocity
was. It was a potential series-killer. There was a gap between The
Judas Tree and the next Easter special, The
Clue of the Savant's Thumb (2013), which was, regardless of
some imperfections, an improvement on its predecessor and everyone
seemed to assume the tone was set for the first regular, if short,
season since the 2003-04 series – which included the excellent The
Tailor's Dummy (2003). Oh, boy, where we wrong!
Jonathan & Polly Creek |
David
Renwick gave his series and detective-character a thorough makeover:
Jonathan Creek shed his duffle coat, moved out of his iconic
windmill, stopped working for Adam Klaus and was married off to
Polly. Admittedly, this reinvigorated the comedic element of the
series and gave the stories a dynamic, somewhat, similar to the
wisecracking, mystery solving couples from the 1930-and 40s.
Unfortunately,
the plots of these three episodes were either very slight (The
Letters of Septimus Noone, 2014), boring and uneventful (The
Sinner and the Sandman, 2014) or just average (The
Curse of the Bronze Lamp, 2014). So this highly anticipated
season quickly turned into a huge disappointment and seemed to be
universally hated, even Alan Davies appeared to be bored, which
looked as if the series had finally reached the end of its lifespan –
ending, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Surprisingly, the story
of Jonathan Creek did not end with those three episodes.
Last
year, a brand new Christmas special was announced, entitled Daemons'
Roost (2016), which impressed me as Renwick's mea culpa
for the aforementioned episodes. The special still had some problems
with plot, pacing and padding, but it was an improvement over its
immediate predecessors. And the story was also written as potentially
a final performance for Creek and Polly. It was an introspective
story, with a glimpses of Creek's childhood and references to
previous cases, but who knows, maybe there will be another holiday
special this or next year. But, for now, lets take a gander at the
latest one.
Daemons'
Roost is the name given to a creepy, decaying mansion, which had
once belonged to Sir Jacob Surtees, "a heartless nobleman of
dark Satanic powers," who had his private chamber of horrors –
where he chained women to the floor and forced them to watch a
devilish magic trick. They would see how an invisible force plucked
their loved from a cage and fly them through the air into a huge,
burning furnace!
A
charming homestead to raise a family. Or so a director of "cheesy
horror movies," Nathan Clore, assumed when settling down there
with his wife and three stepdaughters, but the place soon becomes a
house of mourning. One after another, Clore's wife and two of her
daughters passed away under mysterious circumstances. So Clore
decides to pack up and send away the third one, Alison, who is left
with "fifteen years of nightmares" and childhood memories
of secretly overhearing the source of mothers fears – a creature
known as “the hobgoblin.” After all these years, Clore has
summoned Alison and her husband back to the home, to tell her what
happened to her mother and sisters all those years ago, but, once
again, tragedy struck. Clore suffered a crippling aneurysm and is now
unable to communicate.
One hell of a trick! |
So,
while the story at the mansion slowly progresses, Creek was able to
finally sell the windmill and the place had to be cleared out. As
long-time viewers remember, the place was stuffed to the rafter with
stage props, vintage theatrical posters and magic tricks, but also
childhood mementos. We learn for the first time Creek had a brother,
Terry, who's responsible for kindling an interest in magic and
wonders. But these are not the only memories stalking Creek.
One
of his biggest fans, Rev. Wendell Wilkie, tells him that the murderer
from The House of Monkeys (1997) was released from prison, but "the monster in his breast is vanquished." Well, not
entirely true, as he can be seen stalking Creek throughout the
episode with a sharp knife in his hands.
We
also learn of a so-called untold case, "The Striped Unicorn
Affair," which took place six years ago and had Creek acting as
consulting detective in a poisoning case. The wife of a research
chemist, Stephen Belkin, had been receiving threatening letters,
signed "Anti-Money," which unsettled her and precautions were
taken – securely locking and bolting the bedroom door and windows.
One night, they took "a brand-new sealed bottle of mineral
water” with them, but the glass she poured for herself,
somehow, contained poison. And not a trace of it was found in the
bottle or his glass of bedside water. So, naturally, the police
arrests him on suspicion of having killed his wife, but Creek figured
out how a third party could have introduced poison inside the locked
and bolted bedroom.
By
the way, the flashback shows Creek in his old, trademark duffle coat,
which was a nice little nod to the past! Anyhow...
The
poisoning trick was not bad, clever even, but there was a single
objection against Creek's original explanation and perception of the
case. One that could have been smoothed over with the introduction of
a simple coaster. After all, when there's a coaster on the table,
you're very likely to place your glass or mug on it without a second
thought. Just saying.
Old-School JC |
In
any case, this old poisoning case is connected to the problems going
on at
Clore's
mansion: Stephen Belkin remarried and his second wife is Alison. So,
remembering Creek helped out her husband, she contacts him, but he's
unable to prevent a second, baffling impossibility. Alison and
Stephen are taken from the home, to the mysterious chamber from the
local legend, where Alison sees how figure, dressed in a red, uses
magic to pull Stephen from a cage in the wall and make him fly
through the air – straight into a burning furnace. Honestly, I
loved the grand simplicity of this seemingly impossible situation,
which is, somewhat, in the same tradition as Satan's Chimney
(2001) and The Grinning Man. And for all his flaws, Renwick
really knows how to handle such type of tricks.
Well,
that being said, Daemons' Roost is far from perfect: the
padding of the plot is murderous to the pace and you can nitpick a
thing or two about the overall story. One of them is how the culprits
seem to scheme like a bunch of incomprehensible comic-book villains
and some viewers will probably have reservations about how Creek was
(forced) to dispose of one of them. Or why Creek pretty much threw
away his entire childhood. Some of that stuff impressed me as the
last tangible memories about his (dead?) brother. But the plot was
still miles removed from being the mess that was The Judas Tree
nor was the story as sleep inducing as The Sinner and the
Sandman. A bit padded and drawn out? Yes. But nowhere near as bad
as some past episodes.
So,
to cut a long review short, I was not disappointed about Daemons' Roost. Not one of the best in the series, but also far from the
worst. I'm glad the series (potentially) ends with this one instead
of the previous three episodes.
I think we felt similar about this. I think the base mystery (the magic killings) was a neat trick, the atmosphere reminded me of earlier stories and I did like the Polly interactions (Jonathan talking about his past makes more sense with his wife than any of his earlier assistants), but man, this episode suffered heavily from uninspired padding. Had this been the length of a normal episode, it would've been great. Now it takes ages for the plot to really get going, and even then it's filled with elements that don't really work out well ("The oven incident"). I did like the poisoning trick + resulting hint a lot, but because it's presented as a flashback, a lot of information is withheld which makes it a bit hard to swallow.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I'd say it's a more tightly constructed story than earlier specials (which suffered very much of random subplots), and I thought this special was more entertaining on the whole than series 5, but I can't really talk about this special without adding a lot of 'buts'.
You know what else would've made this a great story? A two-parter, both the length of a normal episode, which would, firstly, explore "The Striped Unicorn Affair." It would end with the viewers getting a hint that Creek got it completely wrong. That way, the second episode can do more justice to all of the good bits from Daemons' Roost (i.e. the magic killings).
DeleteBut, yeah, lots of "buts" about this special.
Great review, and glad you were mainly positive about it! Much the same feelings for me too about the episode, and I also thought of the coaster idea! Would have made it much more solid. Although I still thought the solution and it's subsequent subversion was neat.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ho-Ling as well that sharing his past with Polly was more believable, and I felt that I believed a little more in this grown up, moving on Creek than I did in the rushed series 5. A fitting end I thought, but we shall see I guess!
Who knows? The special was definitely written as a potential gate closer on the series, but the BBC might commission a new special for next Christmas or Easter 2018.
DeleteFunny you had the same idea about the coaster, but then again, we're probably not the only ones.
Ahh, the coaster! Been Googling reviews just to see if anyone else noticed this since it's never addressed in the episode. I realised the husband was the killer immediately as there's no way for Jonathan's suggested murder method to work unless the killer knew precisely where the glass would be, and the person who placed it there was the husband... Having a smaller bedside table or a coaster might have helped solve it but without that it was laughably implausible.
ReplyDeleteExactly. You can never precisely predict where someone is going to put down a glass, unless you can guide that action. A coaster is the simplest and easiest way to do it. Now that I think about it, it could have been used as a clue. Just let Creek notice the other bedside table has a glass and no coaster on it.
Delete