"We go from the past to the future..."- Hercule Poirot (Agatha Christie's Hallowe'en Party, 1969)
Frances
Noyes Hart was an American writer of short stories, which were
published in the Saturday Evening Post, Scribner's Magazine
and Ladies' Home Journal, but she also authored three
crime-related novels and her most well-known work is arguably The
Bellamy Trial (1927) – a courtroom drama that was selected as a
Haycraft-Queen cornerstone
of detective-fiction. But she also penned a traditional-styled
detective novel that, in some regards, preceded Anthony
Berkeley's Panic Party (1934) and Agatha
Christie's And Then There Were None (1939).
Hide
in the Dark (1929) takes place on All-Hallows Eve, 1928, in an
untenanted manor house, called Lady Court, where a group of former
college friends have gathered to have an old-fashioned Halloween
party.
The
drove of friends jokingly refer to themselves as the March Hares,
because the original members were born in March and claimed to be
mad, but wisely decided not to insist on these qualifications when
new people were drawn into the circle of friends. However, they
slowly grew apart since the last time they threw a house party was
ten years ago. So this celebration of All-Hallows Eve is also a
reunion of the March Hares, but a pall hung over the gathering by the
absence of one of them, Sunny, who drowned herself when she was only
nineteen – which happened ten years ago. And the motive for killing
herself may lie with one of her former college chums attending the
reunion party.
So
there you have it. A story with a conventional, but not badly drawn,
backdrop with a premise that's an early example of a classic
plot-device. Hide in the Dark could easily have been a fun or
even an historically important detective novel. Sadly, the first half
of the book unfolds at an excruciatingly tedious pace and the
yammering of the boring cast-of-characters completely ruined the book
for me.
There
are references in the opening part of the book to the past suicide
and the bridge connecting the house to the mainland is swallowed by
the rising water of the creek, which effectively isolated the party
from the outside world. But the only interesting bit from this
portion was the backstory of Lady Court.
A
story concerning the ancestor of one of the party members, Sidney,
who was "a famous duelist" and his consistent fighting
made the elites of the time decide that "the safest place for
His Majesty's servant was His Majesty colony," which brought
him to colonial America with his young wife, Damaris – who had wept
bitter tears for lost England upon arriving in the strange land. One
evening, Sidney was stabbed in the back of the neck, while he sat at
his desk, and everyone assumed he had been murdered by two runaway
slaves. There are some mysteries surrounding the murder, such as
missing sheet of paper and "a few grains of sand" on the desk.
When
I read this backstory, I hoped the historical mystery was going to be
used as a (minor) sub-plot with a solution that would make this
plot-strand a forerunner of the modern-day historical detective
story, but alas, Sidney's murder proved to be nothing more than mere
window dressing.
After
the story, mercifully, managed to drag itself across the halfway
mark, the story finally gets a little bit more interesting.
As
the weather outside worsens, the party decides to play a host of
tradition (Halloween) games, like bobbing for apples, but the main
event of the night is the game that lend its name to the book-title.
The game is pretty much hide-and-seek with the lights out and the
person who has to hide himself found a perfect hiding place, which is
an idea inspired by one of the C. Auguste Dupin stories by Edgar
Allan Poe ("you know, the purloined letter stuff").
The most obvious place in the house, "where no one in God's
world would think of looking," namely the big sofa in front of
the fire where he had to wait until he heard the signal to hide. And
he would simply continue to sit in that spot.
Only
minutes after the gong signaled the start of the game, a scream
pierces through the dark house and when the lights are turned on the
hider is found on dead on the sofa. A stab wound in the neck.
As
said here above, this is the point where the story becomes slightly
interesting, as "the rôle of inquisitor" is passed around
between several characters, but the most notable aspects where in the
tail of the story and concerns two of the characters taking blame for
the murder in order to protect one another – which brought the work
of Christianna
Brand to mind. I also liked how Hart handled, what could have
been, a cliched scene with the murderer attempting to commit suicide.
It was a nice inversion of expectations and in keeping with the
murderer's personality.
However,
by the time I finally arrived at this point of the story, I had
completely stopped caring about who did what and why. And this can
solely be blamed on the tortuous slowness of the first half of the
book. The sluggish pace of that first half managed to extinguish any
flicker of interest I might have had in the plot or character.
So,
technically, it has to be admitted that Hide in the Dark is
not entirely devoid of interest as a detective story, but getting to
those parts is an absolute chore and, once you arrive there, were
hardly worth this reader's time or patience – making this a genuine
letdown. I can only really recommend the book to genre scholars and
historians as an ancestor of the previously mentioned books by
Berkeley and Christie, but leisure readers might want to give this
one a pass.
To
end this review on a positive note, I received my copy of No Killer
Has Wings: The Casebook of Dr. Joel Hoffman (2017) by Arthur Porges today. So that one will be next on the list.
I recall reading this novel on a long-haul flight. which meant that I was locked to my seat and given an extended period to complete it. Like you I found the unfolding of the story sufficiently tedious to paralyse much of my initial interest. Which was a shame as the synopsis made the story sound rather engaging...
ReplyDeleteThe bare bones of the story suggested by the synopsis could have been really engaging, but that interesting story was killed by the slow pace and buried in all of the yammering of the first half. A real shame indeed.
Delete