"Knowledge is progress. We gain knowledge through observation and logic—inevitable logic. And logic tells us that two and two make four—not sometimes but all the time."- Prof. Augustus S.F.X. van Dusen (Jacques Futrelle's "The Leak," collected in The Jacques Futrelle Megapack: Tales of the Thinking Machine and Others, 2013)
Henry
Leverage's name is little-known today and even the GAD
Wiki doesn't have him listed among their legion of obscure
mystery writers. However, he filled the popular slick and pulp
magazines of his day, such as Cosmopolitan, Black Mask,
Argosy All-Story and Detective Story Magazine, but what
set Leverage apart is that his career, as a writer, really began when
he was an inmate of Sing-Sing Prison – where he fulfilled the duty
of editor of the prison magazine, The Star of Hope.
The
scant crumbs of information
on the web does not mention the reason for Leverage's incarceration,
as you don't "interrogate a prisoner concerning his past,"
but he was released in 1919 and used his personal experience to write "crook fiction." In 1925, he created a unique-sounding
series-character, Big Scar Guffman, who is a prisoner serving "a
life sentence plus fifteen years" and struck me as a hardboiled
counterpart to the usual assortment of charming thieves, conmen and
swindlers found in rogue
fiction.
Despite
his proclivity for stories that center around criminals and prison
inmates, Leverage wrote (at least) one cerebral detective novel in
the tradition of the American mystery writers who valued
ratiocination.
Whispering
Wires (1918) was published almost a century ago and must have
been written when Leverage was still behind bars, but the plot of the
story is genuine interesting and stands on the border dividing two
distinct periods in the history of the genre – namely the Doylean
Era of crime-fiction and the coming Golden Age. Good news is that the
Golden Age-like elements have the upper hand here. The story plays
entirely fair with the reader and one of the main focal points of the
plot is an apparently impossible murder.
A
locked room mystery boosting a solution that must have been very
impressive and novel for the period, but I am getting ahead of myself
here.
Triggy
Drew is a private-investigator who operates "the greatest city
of the modern world," New York City, who did not "overrate
his own powers" and built a reputation on hard, solid work. He
wasn't always perfect at the job, but good enough to net him a
wealthy client who always called on him when he needed a detective.
Montgomery
Stockbridge is a Munitions Magnate and the first time he had hired
Drew was to track down an absconder, which he did to the full
satisfaction of his employer. So when Stockbridge went up against
Mortimer Morphy, "the Wolf of the Ticker," Drew was tasked
with gathering evidence proving "the gentleman bank-wrecker"
had appropriated large amounts of money and wrecked a score of homes
– culminating with a conviction at the end of a long, drawn-out
court battle. When he was sentenced to ten to twenty years in state
prison, Morphy swore he would get back at Stockbridge "if it
took the longest day of his life." And a bizarre death-threat
brings Drew back into the employ of Stockbridge.
Someone
used the name of Stockbridge's physician to order the superintendent
of Ridgwood Cemetery to have a grave dug in the family plot, because "a death was about to occur in the Stockbridge family." A
threat punctuated by a whispering voice over the telephone promising
that they would go after his daughter, Loris, as soon as they were
finished with him. So Drew takes the case and leaves his client
behind inside a sealed room, a "double-locked and triple-watched
library," but, at the end of the day, they're forced to take an
ax to the sturdy library door.
The
telephone in the library was engaged, but Stockbridge remained
unresponsive and when the ax had done its work they discover why:
Stockbridge lay crumpled on the floor with a gunshot wound to the
side of the head and the only living presence in the library was his
pet magpie – screaming, "Ah, Sing," over and over again.
So how did the murderer entered, or exited, a sealed room? A room
with thick walls, a hardwood floor and a smoothly plastered ceiling.
One with all the windows and doors securely locked from the inside
and closely watched from the outside.
As
one of the characters observed, the shooting of the Munitions Magnate
appears to be a complete and utter impossibility!
I
mentioned earlier on this review how the book fits within the
tradition of the American detective story of the ratiocinative
variety. Leverage makes several allusions to Edgar
Allan Poe, as he refers to the impossible murder as "a
second Rue Morgue" and described the magpie "as stately as
a raven" who seemed to crow "Nevermore," but there
are also, what I believe to be, several subtle nods to Jacques
Futrelle – who's known as the creator of the Thinking Machine.
The
Thinking Machine is known to snap at everyone who dares to suggest a
problem appears to be an impossible one, because "nothing is
impossible." Drew gave a similar response by stating that
there's no such word and invoking it is "a fool's excuse."
You can add to that a character who's plotting behind bars (c.f. "The
Problem of Cell 13," 1905) and the technical nature of the
solution, which is reminiscent of Futrelle's scientific-and
technological based detective stories.
So
I found it intriguing to see the (possible) influences of these two
early, pre-GAD writers on a detective story is, essentially, a Golden
Age mystery. Well, for the most part anyway.
Another
element that makes Whispering Wires a Golden Age-style tale of
ratiocination is the presence of several clues that, when spotted,
reveal the whole truth behind the murder. You should be able to the
deduce the who-and how of the murder based on the clues hidden in the
story. Once you grasp the truth behind the locked room trick, you
should be able to deduce the well-hidden murderer, because the nature
of the trick and motive leaves only one possible suspect. Admittedly,
the identity of the murderer is less interesting than how this person
to shoot someone in a sealed and watched room, but they nicely tied
together by the clues. So you really have no excuse to not get it
right with this one.
Some
of you might dismiss the book, based on my review, as being too
transparent, but keep in mind that the passage of time has dulled the
originality of the plot. The technical side of the story, such as the
crossed wires and smooth bullets, is not as exciting to us jaded,
modern-day readers as it probably was to the average reader of 1918 –
when telephones had just experienced its first commercial growth and
the cleverest detective stories were still ahead of them. I can
imagine readers at the time being impressed by the plot and the
innovations it contained. After all, a "threat-by-wire"
was a new and novel way of telling someone they were going to enjoy
the unwelcome comforts of an early grave. We take instant
death-threats for granted today! ;)
Additionally,
the readers were given a very real shot at solving the problem of the
locked room and identifying the shooter themselves. Sure, the clues
are easier spotted today than they were back then, but even then they
were planted in the text for the observant reader to find and
interpret. And that's pretty nifty for a mystery published in 1918.
Long
story short, I liked this simple, straightforward and well-clued
detective novel with a locked room murder that slammed the door on
all hoary, moth-eaten bag of tricks from the previous century. No
secret passages of trained, gun-wielding monkey within the pages of
this yarn!
So,
if this overlong, semi-coherent babbling managed to produce a spark
of curiosity, you can pull Leverage's Whispering
Wires from Gutenberg and read the story for yourself.
Oh,
a final note of warning: try to avoid looking at the original
book cover. It spoils an important part of the solution. The reader
has been warned!
Thanks for the review - just got it via my local Kindle store. :) Hope I enjoy it as much as you enjoy Kindaichi. :D
ReplyDeleteAnd there goes my long-standing reputation as a staunch detractor of the Kindaichi series.
DeleteYeah, okay, you've got me intrigued -- I'll make a note of this and track it down when my new book embargo of June lifts. Many thanks for yet another recommendation.
ReplyDeleteI admire your resolve and determination, JJ, but didn't your previous attempt(s) at a self-imposed embargo fail miserably?
DeleteOh, horribly, yes. I'm still paying compensation to those people even after all these years...
Delete