"I told you these were shadows of the things that have been... that they are what they are, do not blame me."- Ghost of Christmas Past (Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, 1843)
One of the most remarkable resurgence
from obscurity has to be the small-scale renaissance of J.
Jefferson Farjeon's fanciful crime-fiction (e.g. Holiday
Express, 1935), which can be traced back to a 2012 blog-post
from genre historian and critic, Curt Evans – who spoke warmly about Mystery
in White (1937). A wondrous and wintry crime novel that became "a
festive sleeper hit" when it was reprinted by the British Library
in 2014. Everyone was astonished when the book, out of nowhere, sold over
60,000 copies!
So, I'm kind of late with my review of
the book, but still well ahead of this years' festive season and you can expect
two or three further reviews of Christmas
mysteries in the coming months. But first things first!
Mystery in White is a rattling yarn of Mitchellian
crime and wonder, which embarked on its fantastical journey when the "half a
dozen inmates of a third-class compartment on the 11.37 from Euston" found
themselves stranded on a snowbound train. The seemingly never-ending snowfall
blocked the railway tracks, back and forth, turning the unofficial halt into a
permanent one. However, this extreme Christmas Eve blizzard does not worry Mr.
Hopkins, "the elderly bore," who experienced a month-long tempest in the
Yukon town of Dawson, but he's the only one in the compartment who "pooh-poohed
the whole thing as insignificant" – as most of them wished they were somewhere
else.
The young woman next to the bore is a
beautiful chorus girl, named Jessie Noyes, who is on her way to Manchester for
an important audition. Robert Thomson is a tall, pale and unhealthy looking
youth, which is "due partly to the atmosphere of the basement office in
which he worked," but the clerk also has a rising temperature. David and
Lydia are brother and sister en route to a Christmas party, which they
probably have to miss due to the complete whiteout outside of their railway
compartment.
Finally, there's the fascinating
personality of Mr. Edward Maltby, of the Royal Psychical Society, who has an
appointment to interview the ghostly residue of Charles I of England –
reputedly stored inside the walls of an old house in Naseby. Maltby believes
that "the past is ineradicable," stored away, which can be revealed and
replayed like a gramophone record. And he proved to be an interesting
detective-like character in the tradition of William Hope Hodgson's Carnacki, the
Ghost Finder (1910) and John Bell from A
Master of Mysteries (1898) by L.T. Meade and Robert Eustace.
Malty is also the one who set the train
of events in motion when he out of the compartment, "into the all-embracing
snow," in an attempt to reach a different line.
Not long after his departure, Jessie,
Robert, David and Lydia decide to follow in the footsteps of the psychic
investigator, but Mr. Hopkins, the eternal bore, frowns at the notion of
venturing out in the snow. So he stays puts. But "the four adventures"
are determined to track across "the motionless white scene" of the "strange
fairyland" outside, which is fraught with more dangers than they initially
anticipated. Luckily, they manage to survive a renewed blizzard, a small avalanche
and a pitfall, but they manage to penetrate "the curtain of whirling white"
and the reach the threshold of a lonesome house – where a welcoming log fire is
roaring in the hearth, tea has been laid and a kettle of water is boiling.
There is, however, one problem: nobody appears to be home! In fact, the place
seems to be completely abandoned.
On a quick side note, the lonely house,
in combination with the holiday theme, reminded me of Bill
Pronzini's "No Room at the Inn," which can be found in the short story collection
Carpenter
and Quincannon: Professional Detective Services (1998). It makes for an
interesting comparison.
Anyway, the marooned party from the train
slowly ease into their role as comfortable trespassers, because having two
wounded (or sick) members is as good an excuse as any, but they begin to
realize that something is not quite alright – such as noises and sounds coming
from behind a locked door of an attic room. A room that is later found to be
unlocked and empty! Soon, they find Maltby on the doorstep and a man, who calls
himself "Smith," with a Cockney accent and a suspicious act, accompanies him. Smith
claims he knows nothing about a snowbound train, but is in the possession of a
train ticket.
An obvious lie that might be easily
explained by news that’s brought to the stranded party by the half frozen bore,
Mr. Hopkins: the body of a man, strangled to death, was found in an adjoining
compartment not long after their departure. So is the murderer one of them and
is there a possible connection between the murder and the empty house?
I could go on to describe the subsequent
events, but, after a quarter or so of the book, it turns into the kind of story
you really should read for yourself, because the overall plot is not easily
pigeonholed. Mystery in White can hardly be described as a traditional
whodunit with a logically constructed plot or a thriller with breathtaking
scenes of suspense. The story is far too gentle to be a thriller and the
explanation really disqualifies it from being a whodunit. However, the plot does
borrow components from these types of stories: Maltby makes a series of
deductions based on several items he found in the house and stages an excellent
dénouement, in which he brings an old portrait to life to explain a
long-forgotten murder that happened there on Christmas Eve of 1917.
There was also a nice touch about "the
official version," described in the next to last chapter of the book, in which
the reader is told about the police's official, but incorrect, view of the case
and its explanation. So you can have a chuckle at their expense.
I really liked these particular scenes,
however, they did not make for the sort of detective story that was typical of
the 1930s. I labeled the book earlier as a Mitchellian crime fantasy, but I
suppose a Poean tale of mystery and imagination would be a better description. One
that only allows you to take it one chapter at a time, but even after eighty
years, the book still feels like a breath of cold, fresh air in the genre. Something
that's genuinely out of the ordinary, strange and original, but can still be
enjoyed and appreciated by such fervent classicist as yours truly. I guess the
best way to view the book is as our genre’s version of Charles Dickens' A
Christmas Carol (1843).
I have been really keen to read this since the time it was republished. Your review has made me all the more keen. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI hope you find it as enjoyable a story as I have. Just remember, the book does not fit the mold of either a traditional detective story or an old-fashioned thriller. But you get something special and fun in return.
DeleteInteresting that the very title that kickstarted the popularity surrounding the British Library Crime Classics series isn't quite a traditional Golden Age mystery... Will be trying this title out soon, perhaps nearer to Christmas itself?
ReplyDeleteOne of the explanations I read is that the book appeared just before everyone started Christmas shopping. And the book looked like a great gift to people for that mystery consuming relative or friend of theirs, which is what pushed most of the copies over the counter.
DeletePersonally, I like to believe the world is slowly rediscovering their undying love for Golden Age mysteries. :)
This book is the reason that I've approached the whole British Library venture with lots of trepidation, because I was sorely disappointed. It's certainly not a GA mystery novel.
ReplyDeleteI'd be happy to be told that the other British Library reprints are more traditional GA mysteries, because some of the reviews I've seen make them sound interesting, but this really was disappointing.
Luckily, I was not expecting a regular whodunit or thriller. So I was protected from disappointment on that front.
DeleteBritish Library reprinted some good ones: Anthony Wynne's Murder of a Lady, a.k.a. The Silver Scale Mystery, was an obscure, but great, locked room mystery.
Alan Melville's Death of Anton was a fun, quirky mystery and Miles Burton's Death in the Tunnel is great if you love how-dun-its.
Reportedly, Freeman Wills Crofts' The Hog's Back Mystery is a solid effort and Christopher St. John Sprigg's Death of an Airman is supposedly a bone-fide classic. Both of them are on my TBR-pile for the near future.
John Bude had a pleasant writing style, but his plots are pretty avarage. Same can be said about John Rowland's Calamity in Kent, which is a pleasantly written crime story, but not particular great.
On the other hand, I can't recommend their reprints of Mavis Doriel Hay. The Santa Klaus Murder was my worst (and most boring) read of last year and Curt Evans has a very off-putting review of Murder Underground. So you've been warned about her!
Yes, Curt's comments on Mavis Doriel Hay have convinced me not to touch her books.
DeleteI've quite liked the two John Bude titles I've read so far. Definitely second-rank stuff but fairly enjoyable.
I'm looking forward to Death in the Tunnel. The other Burton I've read was also pretty strong on the how-dun-it angle.
I hope you'll enjoy Death in the Tunnel and the other one they reprinted, The Secret of High Eldersham, seems to be interesting as well. Perhaps not one of his best, but still pretty interesting.
DeleteThanks for your recommendations! I actually have "Death of Anton" lying around somewhere, so I'll probably read that soon. I'll be looking out for some of the other titles mentioned here as well, they do sound more interesting than this mess. ;)
DeleteThe story is far too gentle to be a thriller and the explanation really disqualifies it from being a whodunit.
ReplyDeleteThe only Farjeon I've read is At the Green Dragon and that's the feeling I got from it - not quite a thriller and not quite a mystery. Quite fun though, in a lighthearted way.
Farjeon's work is slowly emerging from obscurity as a subgenre all by its own, which is quite an accomplishment.
Delete