"It's a dirty business, my lad: poisoning kids."- Superintendent Hadley (John Dickson Carr's The Problem of the Green Capsule, 1939)
Elizabeth
Daly was an American novelist who, during the forties of the previous
century, penned sixteen sophisticated mystery novels about a professional
bibliophile and amateur snoop, Henry Gamadge, which earned her an Edgar
statuette – awarded a decade after the publication of her last novel, The
Book of the Crime (1951). Reportedly, one of Daly's most famous admirer
was no less a figure than Agatha
Christie.
So she had excellent credentials, but
when I took a look at Daly, some time ago now, I was very disappointed with
what I found. The book that turned me away from her work was Murders
in Volume 2 (1941), which had an alluring premise, but the plot never
delivered the goods and the story progressed excruciatingly slow – comparable
to the pace of a morphine drip. There are parts of my brain that think they're
still reading the damn book! But enough time has passed to warrant a second
glance at Daly and Gamadge.
Deadly
Nightshade (1940) was Daly's second mystery
novel and finds Gamadge in his private library, "where he followed the
occupation of consulting expert on old or pseudo-old books, manuscripts and
autographs," but his attention is divided between a yellowed fragment of
paper, war news
rattling from the wireless and memories of State Detective Mitchell – whom he
met in first recorded case, Unexpected
Night (1940), when he was "inveigled by circumstances" to play
amateur detective. Coincidently, the phone rings a few minutes later and it is
a long distance call from Maine. Mitchell has a case on his hands that might
interest Gamadge.
A rash of nightshade poisonings of small
children plagued the vicinity between Oakport and Harper's Rock, which claimed
at least three victims. A group of children got their hands on some poisonous
berries and the resulting tragedies varied greatly: the youngest son of Albert
Ormiston, a relatively well-known artist, fully recovered, but the daughter of
Carroll Bartram, a manufacturer of artificial silk, was allergic to atropine
and died. A third girl, Sarah Beasley, evidently had eaten some of the berries,
but, in a poisonous stupor, "wandered off and got in the marsh" – she
has not been found.
There are also suspicions of a fourth
poisoning, involving one of the children from a gypsy camp, which is giving the
locals a reason "to start pestering the gypsies," but Mitchell have
reasons to believe that the affair is slightly more complicated then that. The
boy who survived, Tommy, says "a lady in a car gave him the berries."
Only problem is that the poison has a confusing effect on its victim and there
can't be a value put on the boy's statement. These poisonings coincided with a
fatal motorcycle accident of a young state trooper named Trainor. But was it
really an accident?
Gamadge and Mitchell have to dig through
a lot of back-stories and family history in order to unsnarl all of the links
in the chain of tragedies that rocked the small Maine community. Rooting around
in other people's past live can be an unpleasant occupation and this was
touched upon when they visited the gypsy camp. Gamadge has his fortune told by
an elderly lady, Mrs. Stuart, who told him he was "born under a dark star,"
the companion of Sirius,
which is "so dark that no mortal eye has ever seen it" and is only known
through "the perturbation of orbits" – condemning the
bibliophile-detective "to perturb the orbits of others" while "remaining
unsuspected and unseen." Perturbing is exactly what he does.
In one of the households, he finds the
survivor of a forgotten tragedy, the wholesale poisoning of family with
arsenic, which also concerned a lost child. He also gets on the trail of woman,
a Miss Humphrey, who claimed to work for a magazine and went around snapping
pictures of children for a competition to crown the finest child in Maine.
However, some of the more interesting plot-threads were introduced to the story
through the Bartram family.
Carroll's brother, George, sold his part
in the silk mill to his brother and moved to the Netherlands, where married and
had a little girl, but the European situation scared him and moved his family
to the United States. Surprising his brother on a very short notice. Naturally,
I perked up when the background of these characters were pointed out and the
plot was littered with references to their past lives in the Netherlands, but
their return also brought an additional complication to the plot: the late
father of Carroll and George lost a "mythical nest egg" of at least four
hundred thousand dollars and there's a mention of a collection of pictures he
bought in 1927, which may have included a long-lost painting by Vermeer of
Delft. Yes. There was one of those in the recently reviewed There's
a Reason for Everything (1945) by E.R. Punshon.
Well, I guess it's time to make up the
balance: Deadly Nightshade does not only setup a premise full of
promise, but, on this occasion, delivered on it and the explanation for the
plot was as original as its premise. I can easily see now why someone like
Christie would be a fan of her work. Only drawbacks are Daly's feeble grasp on the
concept of pacing (i.e. slow moving) and the sub-plot of the murdered state
trooper was unnecessary. I think the story could have done without it, but Daly
probably felt a detective story needed a clear-cut murder.
To make a long story short, I wish Deadly
Nightshade had been my introduction to Daly's work instead of the seemingly
never-ending and soul-deadening Murders in Volume 2.
Finally, allow me to draw your attention
to the website of Les Blatt, Classic
Mysteries, who is a fan of Daly and reviewed
thirteen of her sixteen Henry Gamadge mysteries, which is how this series never
left my peripheral field of view.
Your brain goes on working on problems subconsciously long after you have forgotten about them consciously. So it would not surprise me if your brain was still digesting the first Daly book you read.
ReplyDeleteIt was more of a joke to illustrate how mind-numbingly slow the pace of that book was. :)
DeleteI just wanted to thank you for your endlessly fascinating and insightful reviews of books I have always intended to read. Your opinons tend to jibe with mine ~ so you are, in fact, quite a time-saver. Keep up the good work ~ as the elementary school teachers used to say. :-)
ReplyDeleteJust riding my hobbyhorse here, but glad you like the rambling posts about detective stories.
Delete