"They're queer-looking things... some of 'em look like sea-monsters that haven't grown up."- Sgt. Heath (S.S. van Dine's The Dragon Murder Case, 1934)
The Case of
the Gold-digger's Purse (1942) is the twenty-sixth
entry in Erle
Stanley Gardner's Perry Mason series and the opening of the story enmeshed
the cunning defense-attorney in a tangle of extortion, theft and murder – which
began with a seemingly uninteresting and innocent consultation on gold fish.
Harrington
Faulkner is in the real-estate business, where he amassed a king's ransom, but
only cultivated a single passion to spend his dollars on: breeding gold fish.
Faulkner
raised a particular strain of Veiltail Moor Telescopes,
a gold fish completely cloaked in funeral black and often referred to as the "Fish
of Death," but this school of rare fish are suffering from a deadly decease
known as gill fever. A young, poor chemist and pet shop employee, Tom Gridley,
developed a formula that cures gill fever. However, Gridley is suffering from
tuberculoses and should take a break from work to recover, but he can't afford
to leave his job and now his beautiful girlfriend, Sally Madison, is extorting
thousands of dollars from Faulkner – in exchange for the formula.
A gold-digging
extortionist and a bout of gill fever aren't the only plagues pestering the
aquarist. Faulkner has had a fall-out with his business partner, Elmer Carson,
who slapped a restraining order on Faulkner, which forbids him from removing
the aquarium and its content from their shared office.
Mason is
reluctant to get involved, but curiosity keeps getting the best of him until he
and Della Street are in legitimate danger of becoming accessories after the
fact in the murder of Harrington Faulkner. It begins when the office is burgled
and the aquarium looted, which gives Mason an opportunity to make some astute
deduction about the soup ladle, the pole it was mounted on and the size of the
room. By the way, the theft was briefly teased as a locked
room mystery.
The gold fish
are eventually found, alongside Faulkner's body, on the bloodstained bathroom
floor of his home and Mason's typical, almost routine manipulation in murder
cases has now dug him a hole for two.
One of the
most attractive aspects of the Perry Mason series, as an unabashed
neo-classicist, is how densely plotted each novel is. There's barely any fat on
the bone, so to speak. The multitude of cross-and hidden relationships and the
motives that drives those relationships are often complex, which is exactly the
case here, but there's also the physical evidence and how you can play around
with that. There's a missing bullet from a previous murder attempt on Faulkner,
a half dead gold fish that could indicate the time of death, fooling around
with fingerprints and cheque stubs – and the titular purse stuffed with damning
evidence.
Mason has to
play a tight game of bluff poker and live up to his name as a courtroom
magician in a preliminary hearing to prevent a murder trial for the wrong
person. The courtroom chapters tended to drag on a bit, but you can't blame
craftsmen, Gardner and Mason, for taking the time to work their magic.
In short: a
good mystery from a solid series. Hopefully, the next review/blog-post will be substantially better
written than this one.
The previous
Perry Mason novels I have reviewed:
The
Case of the Baited Hook (1940)
The
Case of the Empty Tin (1941)
The Case of the Drowning Duck (1942)
The Case
of the Gold-digger's Purse (1942)The Case of the Drowning Duck (1942)
The Case of the Drowsy Mosquito (1943)
The Case of the Lonely Heiress (1948)
I haven't got to his 1940s books yet but his 1930s stuff is great fun. Especially the way Mason sails so incredibly close to the wind but always gets away with it. Which was apparently Gardner's own style as a trial lawyer.
ReplyDeleteI keep picking the 1940s books, but did read The Case from the Counterfeit Eye, in the pre-blogging days, and it was indeed great fun. Mason was even less hesitant with manupilating the evidence than in the ones from the 40s. Great fun, indeed!
DeleteThanks for that TC. I read a lot of these as a kind but more recently I have really enjoyed the earlier, hardboiled entries, where Perry seems to never actually reach the courtroom - perverse perhaps for a series about a lawyer (my old profession too), but I seem to like those earlier ones better!
ReplyDeleteWhich one is the best from those earlier, hardboiled Perry Mason novels? I know I have The Case of the Velvet Claws, but that was apparently a rip-off of Hammett (or so I have read).
DeleteI think the best Perry Mason books are from the 1950s. But there are plenty of enjoyable Perry Mason mysteries from the Forties. Love the cover on this one!
ReplyDeleteI have read all 85 of the Perry Mason mysteries, and must say that I like the ones from the 1940s the best, although they were all good.
ReplyDelete