"Things were certainly bad when a respectable communications officer began playing gumshoe."- Lt. Chuck Masters (Murder in the Navy, 1955)
A year before the late Evan Hunter adopted
the Ed McBain moniker for the 87th Precinct series, which ran for fifty years,
there was a crime novel with the stylistic trappings of a traditional whodunit,
Murder in the Navy, published under the Richard Marsten byline – later
reissued as Death of a Nurse (1955) as by Ed McBain.
U.S.S. Sykes is a U.S. Navy
destroyer and the backdrop for Death of a Nurse, on which the
well-oiled, but routine, existence of the sailors is disrupted by Navy Day
sight-seers and the discovery of the body of a Navy nurse in the radar shack.
The reader witnesses how her boyfriend throttles Claire Cole to death without
learning his identity and the case becomes a brass concern.
An investigative board of naval officers
is formed, one of them being Lt. Chuck Masters, the story's protagonist, and a
pair of FBI agents are send down to look into the case – which promised a nice
contrasting of amateur and professional detective work. Frederick Norton and
Matthew Dickason are G-Men, however, they look and act more like a snotty
amateur reasoner of some celebrity of a bygone age and his Dr. Watson, but they let
the captain know who's in charge of the inquiry – restricting the investigative
board to gathering facts for the ship log. Nonetheless, they scooped up a
handful of names from the sea of suspects by employing the same method: who
were in possession of the keys to the radar shack and were, at one time or
another, committed to the hospital ward and on leave during a specific period.
They had four names to pick from and that
makes for a joyful game of whodunit, but, unfortunately, a second murder is
written off as the suicide of Claire Cole's murderer. Consumed by remorse or
feeling the hangman's noose tighten and preferred to chuck himself overboard,
but the reader witnessed the unknown, shadowy assailant attacking and rolling
him into the water beneath them. Here the official and investigative board,
under pressure and after roughly sixty pages, closes the case and that takes
the urgency out of the story – which rapidly deteriorates into a
run-of-the-mill crime novel.
Lt. Masters is convinced that the
murderer is still at large, but is forced to stop snooping around and ordered to accept
the official explanation. Meanwhile, Masters and the unknown murderer are
developing an interest in nurse Jean Dvorak, but at this point in the story, I
was only able to marvel at the breathtaking stupidity at how some of the
characters were poking and agitating the murderer – especially the last one to
fall. He was one step away from dropping on his knees and popping out a small,
velvet lined box containing a shiny cyanide capsule and asking, "will you murder me?"
McBain probably realized this and tried to excuse the victim by letting Jean
confess that he was a good boy inside, who loved to violate classic
compositions on his violin. The defense should probably take note of
that. Hey, I try to keep this review up beat and you should sing
my praise for not going with "Through a Keel-Haul" as a post-title for
this shoddily written review.
Anyway, to whom did Jean make this
confession, alongside a truckload of pesky questions about Cole Claire, while
pretending to fall for this persons advances? The man who she happens to
gravely suspect of having killed three people and successfully eluded investigators
from different bureaus and organizations... while alone and slowly being
undressed. Three of the four (would-be) victims could've
easily aired their suspicions in saver environment to officials, but they
practically went in front of him (the second one on an abandoned part of the
ship in the dark) while saying, "I know what you did and it's going to ruin your
life." I accept one dummy like that, but there were all together three of
them (minus Claire Cole, who was the true victim of this book) and only one of
them survived.
Death of a Nurse is well written as a story of crime, but lousy as a detective novel
and that was what it posed like for the first quarter of the book. I expected more
from the author of Killer's Wedge (1957) and Tricks (1987).
And will I be stopped before spinning the purr-fect pun? Find out in the next blog post.
Is the style of the last half of your review the same as the style of McBain's book? I can't recall reading anything that bad from his pen.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid that the puns and quotes was an ill-attempt at comedy from my side, to punch up the tone of the review, but the characters reflect what I said. Or to quote Otto & George, "I exaggerate to clarify."
DeleteReally enjoyed the review as this is a McBain I am unfamiliar with (well, actually, I'm not sure I've read any of the titles that came out as 'Marstein' even though he did re-purpose some of the plots apparently) - sound a bit stupid so I'll probably give it a miss - and thanks for the overdose of puns as it's friday so anything goes! Cheers TC.
ReplyDeleteAnd hey, I'm a mystery pundit. What did people expect?
DeleteI didn't think your humor was ill-attempted at all. I got a good guffaw out of the velvet box/cyanide capsule line. Thanks for a fun review.
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it.
Delete