"Yes, a damned locked room."- Lt. Eberhardt (Bill Pronzini's "The Pulp Connection," collected in Casefile, 1983)
After my previous review of Max Allan
Collins' The
Lusitania Murders (2002), I was dithering about what to read next: sample
another one of Robert
Arthur's contributions to The Three Investigators, pick up a
holiday-themed mystery novel or return to the pile of unread E.R.
Punshon mysteries? So, of course, I ended up picking something completely
different.
Schemers
(2009) numbers thirty-sixth in Bill
Pronzini's ongoing series about the "Nameless Detective," which can be
categorized as a "bibliomystery"
with two seemingly impossible situations at the core of plot – both of them
perpetrated in a private-library housing one of the finest collections of
detective stories imaginable!
The missing items from the collection are
Raymond
Chandler's The Big Sleep (1939), Rex
Stout's Fer-de-Lance (1934), James M. Cain's The Postman Always
Rings Twice (1934), Ellery Queen's The Roman Hat Mystery (1929) and Dashiell
Hammett's Red Harvest (1929) and The Maltese Falcon (1930).
Some of them are, what are known as, associating copies, which are books
inscribed to fellow writers or famous people. Giving them considerable more
value. There are, however, some anomalies making
this everything but a routine case of theft or fraud, which is why the
insurance company asked "Nameless" to investigate the claim.
First of all, nobody except Pollexfen had
free, unlimited access to the library: the only key to the room was in his
possession and there are double locks on all the (barred) windows and the door.
Secondly, Pollexfen lacked the motivation to swindle his insurance company and
obsessed over his collection like Captain Ahab, which comes on top of the
obvious lack of traces of a burglary – which are a must if you want to swindle
an insurance company. But there are more suspects in the home that houses "one
big unhappy family."
Pollexfen has a wife, Angeline, and
brother-in-law, Jeremy Cullrane, who are "money-grubbing alcoholics" and
they would love to have gotten their greedy hands on half-a-million worth of
books, but lacked opportunity and missed the knowledge to pick assemble a list
of the most valuable titles. It is, however, determined by "Nameless" that a
duplicate key could've been made, but that’s not how the books were spirited
from the library. That answer turned a new page on a classic trick.
The second impossibility concerns "a
sick new way of killing somebody" within the confines of a locked room and
happens when two of the people mentioned above are found in the library: one of
them unconscious and the other with his head blown-off by a shotgun blast. It's
not difficult to figure out who's responsible for the murder, but the mystery
lies in how it was done and the explanation requires an answer to the
Chestertonian question of "how can a homicide not be a homicide" – and
that answer is completely fair, plausible and original. I would also label it
extremely risky and somewhat crazy, but I guess those are prerequisites for
planning and committing a murder.
I want to point out here that Schemers
isn't the only bibliomystery in this hardboiled series: "The Pulp Connection"
and "Booktaker," collected in Casefile (1983), which feature
respectively a murdered pulp collector in his locked library and books and maps
being stolen from a tightly secured store.
Interestingly, one of Pronzini's
colleagues-in-crime, Lawrence Block,
has two similar type of detective/rogue stories to his name that happened to
feature some of the books that figured in Schemers. In "The Burglar Who
Smelled Smoke," collected in both The Mammoth Book of Locked Room Mysteries
and Impossible Crimes (2000) and The
Black Lizard Big Book of Locked-Room Mysteries (2014), a book collector
is murdered in his locked and private library and a first edition of Stout's Fer-de-Lance
figures in the plot – which was inscribed to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The
Burglar in the Library (1997) revolves around a rumored associating copy of
The Big Sleep by Chandler, which according to legend has a written
dedication to Dashiell Hammett. They're excellent and come recommended, if you
like these types of mysteries.
Well, I was planning to end my review
here, but I really just noticed I had completely ignored the second plot-thread
from Schemers. No joke. I was too distracted by my personal obsession
over locked room mysteries.
Schemers
is one of the more recent novels and Nameless has shed his lone-wolf persona
from the earlier books, which lead him to become more of a family man and began
to share his workload – namely with Tamara Corbin and Jack Runyon. Runyon is
the lone wolf of this new pack and he has been doing his best to crawl out of "his
own personal hell."
The case Runyon has been assigned to is
to find the titular schemer, who has been harassing members of the Henderson
family, two adult brother in particular, and the book opened with this figure
desecrating the grave of their father. This person poured acid over the urn and
headstone. Spits several times on the grave and leaves a threatening message
that things have only just begun. A promise that is being kept when one of the
brothers is assaulted in his garage with a tire-iron and it quickly becomes
clear to Runyon the actions of this person is rapidly escalating, which may end
with him pouring acid on a living person.
This plot-thread is meant to add some
tension to compliment to the more cerebral investigation Nameless is
conducting, but the why-dun-it aspect of the case was genuinely interesting –
even to a classicist like yours truly. After a while, you simply want to know
where all that pure, unadulterated hate oozed from. The only part I found
annoying was Tamara's contribution to both cases, which consists of walking
around with "a big cat-ate-the-canary smile" and talks insistently how a
certain Lucas Zeller gave her sex-life a much needed protein injection with his
meat needle. She also looks up some stuff on the internet for the guys, but I
found her mostly annoying in this outing.
Fortunately, that only covers a tiny
portion of the book and the majority covers the chapters detailing a couple of
well written, intricately plotted stories populated with believable, rounded
characters. Basically, everything one has come to expect from one of the
grandmasters of the genre.
Sounds great - ages before I get to this one (my plan on reading them all in chronological order has faltered but next year ...)
ReplyDeleteReading this series in order is probably the smart thing to do, since it's written as sort of ongoing biography of "Nameless," but Pronzini rarely (if ever) spoils previous books. So, I'll probably continue hopping around the series.
DeleteI remember thinking that this was not one of the better entries in the "Nameless" series, though I absolutely can't recall any of the plot details!
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, the story "Booktaker" has sequel in one of the novels. It's a surprise so I won't give away which one it is.
DeleteYes. I've read the novel you're referring to and discovering it was a sequel, of sorts, was indeed a surprise. Not just to see a return to that story, but to do so in a book that might as well belonged to a different sub-genre were it not by the same writer and series.
DeleteThanks for the review of SCHEMERS by Pronzini. I went and just now ordered a copy from Amazon.com, and should have it shortly. I have read other books in the series, so I know Pronzini is a good writer. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteMonte Herridge
I hope you enjoy the book, Monte!
Delete