"Twin brothers, and doubles generally, must not appear unless we have been duly prepared for them."- Msgr. Ronald A. Knox (A Decalogue: Ten Commandments for Detective Fiction, 1929)
The
Echoing Strangers (1952) is Gladys
Mitchell's twenty-fifth mystery novel about her incomparable,
witch-like series-character, Mrs. Bradley, who is a consulting
psychiatrist to the Home Office and probably had the longest lifespan
of any detective from the genre's Golden Age – debuting in Speedy
Death (1929) and bowing out in the posthumously published The
Crozier Pharaohs (1984). During that fifty-five year period,
Mrs. Bradley's cases filled the pages of sixty-six books and one
collection of short stories (i.e. Sleuth's Alchemy, 2005).
As
a mystery novelist, Mitchell was as prolific as she was original and
imaginative. However, she was not always as consistent in the quality
department and even her greatest admirers acknowledged her output
suffered a decline during the 1950s, which lasted until the seventies
– when she reportedly returned to the fantastic plot-elements that
defined her earlier detective stories (e.g. The
Greenstone Griffins, 1983).
So
that would place The Echoing Strangers in Mitchell's dodgy
period, but the book is still held in high regard by Nick Fuller and
Jason Half of The Stone
House. And was recommended to me personally by John
Norris in the comments on my review of Late,
Late in the Evening (1976). Purportedly, the book is a
bizarre mixture of identical twins, a homicidal grandfather,
blackmail and cricket, but also stronger than usual on detection and
clueing.
Naturally,
my interest was piqued and placed the book on top of my to-be-read
pile, but forgot all about it until my previous review
brought it back to my attention for obvious reasons. Since it has
been a year since the last time I looked at one of Mitchell's novels,
I decided to finally pluck this often praised title from the big
pile.
The
Echoing Strangers opens with Mrs. Bradley traveling down to the
village of Wetwode, situated on the River Burwater in Norfolk, where
she planned to a pay a visit to an old school-friend of hers, but
upon her arrival she discovers that a family emergency called her
school-friend to Gateshead – which leads her to hire a boat and
sail down the river. When she navigated "a pronounced bend"
in the river, Mrs. Bradley witnessed a bizarre scene on the lawn of
one of the river-side bungalows. A middle-aged woman being pushed
into the water by "a slender, handsome youth."
The
adolescent is a seventeen year old deaf-and-dumb boy, named Francis
Caux, who was orphaned at age seven and subsequently separated from
his twin brother, Derek, which done by their despicable grandfather,
Sir Adrian. A truly villainous character reminiscent of Dr. Grimsby
Roylott from Conan
Doyle's "The Speckled Band" (from The Adventures of
Sherlock Holmes, 1892).
Sir
Adrian Caux abandoned his damaged grandson and placed him under the
wing of a guardian, Miss Higgs, who Mrs. Bradley witnessed being
pushed into the river by her ward. On the other hand, Derek was
brought back to Sir Adrian's home in the village of Mede.
Consequentially, Francis and Derek have not seen one another for
nearly ten years. Or so everyone assumed. But the river incident
places Mrs. Bradley on the scene when the first, of two, murders is
committed that are closely intertwined with the Gemini game the
brothers have been secretly playing.
Mr.
Campbell is "a misanthropic naturalist" and local
blackmailer, who loved to observe "courting couples through his
field-glasses," but someone had battered in his skull and his
assailant found an original way to dispose of the body – attaching
the remains to the bottom of dinghy by iron bands and staples. And
the dinghy belongs to Francis!
Meanwhile,
Sir Adrian engages a schoolteacher, named Tom Donagh, as a holiday
tutor for Derek, but specified in the advertisement an "opening
batsman and slip fielder" is "preferred." Even
asking any applicants to supply their "last season's batting
average." Sir Adrian loves cricket and heads the village
cricket team, which in one scene has to play against the patients and
doctors of "a sort of second-class Broadmoor." However,
the main event is the annual game against the team of the village's
longtime rival, the neighboring village of Bruke, but the game ends
with the murder of the visiting captain, Mr. Witt, whose body was
found in the showers of the cricket pavilion – beaten to death with
his own cricket bat. Once again, the victim was a known blackmailer
and Derek lacked a much needed alibi.
Evidently,
this is a case requiring the hand of an expert and, luckily, Mrs.
Bradley is in superb form with her eccentricities almost completely
expunged. So she doesn't poke any ribs with a yellow claw or let
loose a sudden, pterodactyl-like shriek that can be interpreted as a
form of laughter. She sinks a lot of time in questioning the people
occupying the neighboring bungalows in Wetwode case or theorizing
about the role of the twins in the cricket murder in Mede. Despite
being in top form, Mrs. Bradley is slightly reluctant to solve both
murders.
After
all, the victims were known blackmailers and they were about as
popular during the Golden Age as kiddie diddlers are today. Mrs.
Bradley is of the opinion that blackmailers are worse than murderers
and considered the killing of these "poisonous pests" to
be "a distinct gain to society," which is a sentiment
often found in detective stories up to the 1960s and a very famous
example can be found in Conan Doyle's "The Adventure of Charles
Augustus Milverton" – collected in The Return of Sherlock
Holmes (1905). She would not have touched the case had she not
been plagued by "a personal desire" to know if and how the
twin brothers are involved. And the role Francis and Derek played in
the story also showed Mitchell was at the top of her game.
Mitchell
does not underestimate the intelligence of her readers and confirms
before the halfway mark what most have probably figured out by that
point, but this revelation only complicates the case even further.
And it definitively turns the story in who-did-what-and-why instead
of a traditional who-dun-it, which actually makes the book more
mystifying than you would expect. The presence of identical twins in
a detective story can be a spotty business, but The Echoing
Strangers is one of the rare exceptions and arguably the best
possible use of the Gemini gimmick. I would even argue that the twins
were put to better use here than a certain and somewhat famous Ellery
Queen novel from the 1950s, because the reader here is mystified
by throwing pretty much all of the cards on the table.
This
well-written, cleverly constructed story succeeded in being both
utterly simplistic and maddeningly complex at the same time. Not an
easy accomplish, but Mitchell pulled it off. She also deserves praise
for the creative explanation that answered why the murderer used such
a round-a-bout way to dispose of Campbell's body. Mitchell always had
a penchant for bizarre murders (e.g. severed head in the snake-box in
Come
Away, Death, 1937), but this was a particularly good one. It
showed the truth behind the Shakespearan saying that, sometimes,
there's method to someone's madness!
Once
everything has been revealed and explained, a dark, grim shadow falls
across the characters and the story ends on a tragic, but inevitable,
note driving home the truth that this is one of Mitchell's greatest
triumphs. One that ranks alongside the previously mentioned Come
Away, Death, The
Mystery of a Butcher's Shop (1929) and St.
Peter's Finger (1938).
Personally,
I'll never understand people who don't like Mitchell, but The
Echoing Stranger has convinced me to return more often to her
fantastic detective stories. Luckily, I have several of her reputedly
good and excellent titles on the big pile, which includes The
Longer Bodies (1930), the illustrious The
Devil at Saxon Wall (1935), Brazen
Tongue (1940) and Groaning
Spinney (1950). I also want to know whether Laurels
Are Poison (1942) is as good as scholastic mystery as Tom
Brown's Body (1949) and want to read Death
of a Delft Blue (1964) for obvious reasons. So don't touch
that dial!
So glad you enjoyed this one. It's in my top five of Gladys Mitchell novels I've read. I'm not too fond of ...BUTCHER'S SHOP and I think DEATH AT THE OPERA and DEATH AND THE MAIDEN are both overrated. ECHOING STRANGERS, however, was the book that made me change my opinion of Mitchell and seek out all her highest rated books. With the exception of GROANING SPINNEY, sort of middling for me, I've not been disappointed in those I've chosen to read after many years of having given up on her.
ReplyDeleteWhat are the other four titles on your top five of Mitchell novels? It might help selecting my next Mitchell.
DeleteDeath and the Maiden is overrated, especially when rated as a detective story, but the bizarre scene with the local villagers standing in queue and paying money in exchange for a view of the body of a murdered child is unforgettable. You can say about Mitchell what you want, but she knew how to write a good set piece.
Along with The Echoing Strangers these other four are, I think, exemplary of her style, her favorite motifs and themes, and as superior detective novels: Merlin's Furlong, Dance to Your Daddy, When Last I Died, The Rising of the Moon.
DeleteIf I were to make it a Top 10 (I'm not quite there yet) I'd add: Here Comes A Chopper and The Greenstone Griffins ...others to follow
Utter dud: Faintly Speaking
I have not yet read (though I have copies of all of them) Come Away Death, St Peter's Finger or The Devil at Saxon Wall. Based on suggestions from readers and critics I trust I think all of three may end up on my "Top Ten Mitchell" list.
I liked how Mitchell used the child narrator and the general atmosphere of The Rising of the Moon, but the plot, and explanation, is really messy. So would never place it in my top 10. However, Merlin's Furlong and When Last I Died are great!
DeleteCurrently, I'm torn between The Devil at Saxon Wall and The Greenstone Griffins.
Glad you enjoyed it; it's quietly excellent. If you're wondering whether to read Saxon Wall or Griffins, there's no contest. Read Saxon Wall. Hugely imaginative, atmospheric, and ingenious. Contemporary critics praised it; I think it was in his review of it that Torquemada (Observer) said a new Gladys Mitchell was as much an event as a new Dorothy L. Sayers.
ReplyDeleteGriffins is good, but it's also one of Mitchell's last books, and ties together motifs she used in earlier books.
Thanks for your sage advice, Nick! Devil at Saxon Wall will be my next stop.
DeleteI read a couple of Gladys Mitchell books a while back and liked them. Though I wasn't crazy about DEATH AT THE OPERA. I've always meant to read a few more. So now I have some recommended titles to add to my list. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome Yvette! And keep Come Away, Death in mind. It might be the best thing Mitchell wrote.
Delete